Tuesday, June 19, 2018

The continued persecution of Julian Assange

Meryl Streep rushes to prop up THE WASHINGTON POST.  She won't say a word about WIKILEAKS.  But WIKILEAKS did more than THE WASHINGTON POST, THE NEW YORK TIMES and so many others combined.  It told the truth.  It set the truth free.

And that's why Julian Assange is persecuted.

This is from John Pilger:


In 2008, a plan to destroy both WikiLeaks and Assange was laid out in a top secret document dated 8 March, 2008. The authors were the Cyber Counter-intelligence Assessments Branch of the US Defence Department. They described in detail how important it was to destroy the “feeling of trust” that is WikiLeaks’ “centre of gravity.”
This would be achieved, they wrote, with threats of “exposure [and] criminal prosecution” and an unrelenting assault on reputation. The aim was to silence and criminalise WikiLeaks and its editor and publisher. It was as if they planned a war on a single human being and on the very principle of freedom of speech.
Their main weapon would be personal smear. Their shock troops would be enlisted in the media—those who are meant to keep the record straight and tell us the truth. The irony is that no one told these journalists what to do. I call them Vichy journalists—after the Vichy government that served and enabled the German occupation of wartime France.
Last October, the Australian Broadcasting Corporation journalist Sarah Ferguson interviewed Hillary Clinton, over whom she fawned as “the icon for your generation.”
This was the same Clinton who threatened to “obliterate totally” Iran and who, as US secretary of state in 2011, was one of the instigators of the invasion and destruction of Libya as a modern state, with the loss of 40,000 lives. Like the invasion of Iraq, it was based on lies.
When the Libyan president was murdered publicly and gruesomely with a knife, Clinton was filmed whooping and cheering. Thanks largely to her, Libya became a breeding ground for ISIS and other jihadists. Thanks largely to her, tens of thousands of refugees fled in peril across the Mediterranean, and many drowned.
Leaked emails published by WikiLeaks revealed that Hillary Clinton's foundation—which she shares with her husband—received millions of dollars from Saudi Arabia and Qatar, the main backers of ISIS and terrorism across the Middle East.
As secretary of state, Clinton approved the biggest arms sale ever—worth $80 billion— to Saudi Arabia, one of her foundation's principal benefactors. Today, Saudi Arabia is using these weapons to crush starving and stricken people in a genocidal assault on Yemen.
Sarah Ferguson, a highly paid reporter, raised not a word of this with Hillary Clinton sitting in front of her. Instead, she invited Clinton to describe the “damage” Julian Assange did “personally to you.” In response, Clinton defamed Assange, an Australian citizen, as “very clearly a tool of Russian intelligence” and “a nihilistic opportunist who does the bidding of a dictator.”
She offered no evidence—nor was asked for any—to back her grave allegations. At no time was Assange offered the right of reply to this shocking interview, which Australia's publicly-funded state broadcaster had a duty to give him.


Julian's a political prisoner.  Never expect the liars like Meryl to speak up.

Here's C.I.'s "Iraq snapshot:"

Tuesday, June 19, 2018.  So much to cover including Laura Bush!


What happened?  Who did the bombing?  Apparently Israel.

AFP explains:

Israel declined to comment on Tuesday on a weekend air strike against an Iraqi paramilitary base in eastern Syria after its US ally implicated it in the attack.
The Sunday evening strike against the Al-Hari base on the Syrian side of the border with Iraq came less than 24 hours after Prime Minster Benjamin Netanyahu said Israel would strike Iran's "proxies" anywhere in Syria.





Deadly strike on Syria-Iraq border: What we know






Here, via AP, is something that's known: "Iraq condemned on Tuesday the targeting of pro-Syria paramilitary troops in eastern Syria after an airstrike killed mostly Iraqi Shiite forces deployed to fight the Islamic State group."  REUTERS attempts to find its way out of the maze:


Iraq on Tuesday condemned air strikes targeting forces fighting Islamic State in Iraq or Syria after Syrian state media said that U.S.-led coalition aircraft had bombed a Syrian army position near the Iraqi border, causing deaths and injuries.


The U.S. military denied it was responsible, while CNN reported Monday, citing a U.S. official, that in fact Israel was behind the attack.                                                      


PRESS TV offers this description of those targeted, "Hashd al-Sha’abi is an Iraqi state-sponsored umbrella organization composed of some 40 groups, which are mainly Shia Muslims. The force reportedly numbers more than 100,000 fighters. Iraqi authorities say there are between 25,000 and 30,000 Sunni tribal fighters within its ranks in addition to Kurdish Izadi and Christian units."  Of course, another way to describe them would be the people who came in second in Iraq's May 12th elections.

It's interesting how quickly the US government rolled over on Israel -- from just saying "It wasn't us" to naming Israel.

The strike was a huge mistake.  Israel has confirmed every spoken fear the region's had for some time.  At a time when Iraq is still sorting out the elections?  Concern over Israeli influence is now going to again be high.  Look for the Arab states to also renew a focus on the fact that Israel is a nuclear power and to argue that this leaves them at risk.

In March of this year, Amos Harel and Aluf Benn (HAARETZ) reported on how, despite a decade of denial, the Israeli government had bombed Syria in 2007:


It is especially surprising that this is also the story of a secret that was maintained for a long time here in Israel despite the considerable personal interests of a number of those who are now involved in its publication. Only now, more than a decade later, has the military censor allowed the Israeli media to report the history of this affair – and even that, still with restrictions.
The Haaretz investigation of the bombing of the nuclear reactor is based on conversations with 25 of the individuals who were involved in the operation and in the events connected to it, in Israel and in the United States. One of the key figures who led to the decision to bomb the Syrian reactor, the head of the Mossad at the time, Meir Dagan, died in March last year.



Read that second paragraph closely and what it's saying is this was a joint-operation between the governments of Israel and the US -- carried out with US cooperation.

It's worth noting that Sunday's attack was also most likely not a surprise to the US government and probably also took place with US cooperation.

Considering the very long and very convoluted shared history between the governments of the US and Israel, the Iraqi military should probably not have rushed in insisting that the US wasn't involved.


For fifteen years and counting the Iraq War has created massive displacement and internal and external refugees.  This is mirrored in other areas of war.





"one person every two seconds is being dislocated from their homes".....

And the staggering fact is that almost all are Muslims.....Iraq, Syria, Yemen, Palestine, Kashmir, Burma, Afghanistan....now Jordan is on the verge...
Let the horror of this sink deep into your soul.....
 




For Iraq, the refugee crisis has been ongoing and had already, by 2008, created the largest displacement crisis in the Middle East since 1949.




Countries with the most refugees in the US, 2008-2016

1 Myanmar 147K
2 Iraq 137K
3 Bhutan 92K
4 Somalia 57K
5 DRC 44K
6 Iran 30K
7 Cuba 28K
8 Syria 18K
9 Eritrea 15K
10 Sudan 10K

(US News & World)





There's no real improvement for Iraq, each year of the war just increases the number.







"The only answer is to end the conflicts that are forcing people to flee their homes - and for all governments to meet their responsibilities."

- UNHCR Special Envoy Angelina Jolie, at Domiz refugee camp in Iraq.






If that's the only answer, then why has it not been carried out?  Fifteen years of war (just the latest wave) imposed upon them by the US government, you have to wonder where Iraqis gather the strength to carry on but they do.




"These people have lost everything... they have nothing, but they're free."

Our Special Envoy Angelina Jolie describes the devastation, suffering, and glimpses of hope she saw on a visit to West Mosul, Iraq.

9,301 views
0:11 / 0:50

0:39

9,301 views






I don't see them as free, Angie.  I see them as victims of war.  I see them as victims of occupation.  When foreign fighters leave their country, they may be free-er but who knows.  I think you're way too quick to insist they're free and you make that claim on the flimsiest of evidence.  (And I make that criticism as a friend -- I know Angelina.)

I'm not friends with Laura Bush and don't know her but she's under criticism for recent remarks and, quite frankly, should be.  Don't show up at this late date as a champion of children when you've never said one word about all the children your own husband killed.



Our 2003 invasion of Iraq led to the deaths of at least tens of thousands of Iraqi children and making refugees of hundreds of thousands more. Count was lost years ago, there have been so many.

Not that anybody cares -- or really ever did.

cc







"uwu don't criticize laura bush for the actions of her husband!!!"
Sorry but if my husband started the Iraq war I would divorce his ass so fast lmao



  • Laura Bush husband got us into a war in Iraq that killed thousands because of a lie. So please excuse me if I don’t care what she thinks






    Replying to 

    I’m sure that War the her husband started in Iraq that killed 2.5 million people is breaking her heart too. Poor Laura Bush!







    This is how ridiculous American amnesia is. Laura Bush! Who justified the wars against Afghanistan and Iraq again? But yes, let’s talk about how immorality is apparently something the US has only engaged in the last few years...



    Laura Bush should not be today's hero of the American left. She sat by while her hubs went on repeated vacations before 9/11 and let us start completely unjustified war in Iraq.  Signed sincerely, someone who ran downtown that god awful morning.



    Laura Bush expresses outrage about children separated from  parents.

    Where was her outrage for the children of Afghanistan and Iraq  when her husband got the U.S. in those two wars for fraudulent pretenses?

    How many children were killed, left homeless, and maimed?

    Please.







    Lastly, Amnesty International notes:




    Today is Int'l Day for Elimination of Sexual Violence in Conflict

    In , women with perceived ties to are trapped in camps, subjected to rape & sexual exploitation by armed actors. Read their stories →

    Iraqi authorities MUST





    The following community sites -- plus PACIFICA EVENING NEWS -- updated: