First off, Katie Phang.
An important story and C.I. noted it in this morning's snapshot so you'll see more on this story at the end of my post when I repost the snapshot.
Morning
Joe host Joe Scarborough shredded Vice President JD Vance for
“lecturing” Pope Leo XIV by telling him to “stick to matters of
morality” after President Donald Trump trashed the pontiff as “weak” on
Monday.
After a perceived broadside on Iran
from Pope Leo, the first American-born pontiff, Trump lashed out in a
screed on Sunday, branding the pope “WEAK” and declaring: “I don’t want a
Pope who criticizes the President of the United States because I’m
doing exactly what I was elected, IN A LANDSLIDE, to do.”[. . .]On
Tuesday’s show, however, Scarborough zeroed in on Vance, who converted
to Catholicism in 2019, over his rebuttal made during an interview with
Fox News host Brett Baier on Special Report Monday night.
Catholics
have been having quite a bit of a chuckle over a guy who decided to
become a Catholic last week, or a little earlier than that and said,
‘I’ve got to do two things. I’ve got to write a book about being a
Catholic, and I’m going to attack the Pope, and I’m going to lecture the
pope about how he should do his job at the Vatican.’ This, of course,
is JD Vance, who decides he’s lecturing the pontiff on what he should
and should not do, and acting as if he’s shocked and stunned and deeply
saddened that the pope actually talks about things that pertain to the
gospel of Jesus Christ.
Scarborough then
referred to the often-quoted teaching of Jesus Christ – “blessed are the
peacemakers” – as he argued the pope had not attacked Trump but had
merely quoted Jesus.
He continued:
I’ve
just got to say to JD Vance, newly converted Catholic, if you don’t
like what the pope is saying, don’t take it up with the pope, take it up
with Jesus Christ, because those are the words [he’s quoting].
Scarborough
then rolled back the clip of Vance speaking to Baier about the issue,
which he called an “attack” on the pope, in which the vice president
scolded the Vatican and warned it should “stick to matters of morality”
and leave policy to the president.
I
would agree. 100%. JD Vance was not born a Catholic. He was not born
into the faith. He only recently discovered it and now thinks he knows
enough to correct the Pope? Cleary Miss Sassy doesn't know a damn
thing and needs to stop pretending he's Catholic.
Some comments on the article:
Grogg Says1 hour agotelling
the Pope to stick to matters of MORALITY -- hmm I'm pretty sure he
knows a lot about that. Maybe, just maybe vance should try to
understand what morality is and should try to be more considerate
towards others especially the less fortunate
Harold Hardie22 minutes agoClaiming
to be a Catholic does NOT make you a Catholic just as claiming to be a
Christian does NOT make you a Christian and claiming to be a patriot
does NOT make you a patriot. Telling a lie DOES make you a liar.
Violating the law DOES make you a criminal.
M*******3 hours agoIn all fairness JD Vance changes what he believes in every week depending on what Trump tells him he should think.
As if that embarrassment wasn't enough, Chump took to FOX "NEWS" last night to call Chump a terrorism. Matthew Chapman (RAW STORY) notes:
Vice
President JD Vance said something he almost certainly didn't intend
during a Monday interview on Fox News, while discussing the Trump
administration's new policy counter-blockading the Strait of Hormuz to
try to pressure Iran into abandoning its own blockade.
"What
they have done is engage in this act of economic terrorism against the
entire world," said Vance. "As the President showed, two can play at
that game."
This remark provoked an immediate reaction from commenters on social media.
"Does he realize what he just admitted lol," wrote Zeteo News reporter Pram Thakker."Vance
admits that Trump’s blockade is an act of economic terrorism against
the entire world," wrote former GOP operative turned Meidas Touch
editor-in-chief Ron Filipkowski.
"Did Vance just call Trump a terrorist?" Meidas Touch's official account wrote.
What an idiot Miss Sassy is. Some comments on the article:
maryanne mcintyre6 hours agoThis
whole cabinet thinks like a bunch of middle school bullies. Everything
is framed in terms of "us against them". And like the adolescents they
are, they speak first and think later.
Brian Bassett12 hours agoHe's starting to realize how 90% of Americans view him, and it's not looking good for the future.
Nathaniel Porter14 hours agoThere,
there. It alright puppet, excuse me, JD, you're just trying to show you
have separate ideals, etc. from your 'wing man' convict tRUMP. Too bad
you still can't present who you really are w/o angering "Your King."
How long does JD think he can continue with his hideous performance? Tom Boggioni (RAW STORY) notes:
JD
Vance’s less than impressive performance as vice president, combined
with Donald Trump needling him in his comments to the press, led
longtime Financial Times columnist Ed Luce to claim the veep’s star has
faded to the point where he is becoming irrelevant.
And because of that, he no longer can be considered Trump’s successor.
In
a brutally frank column Tuesday morning, headlined, “The ever-shrinking
JD Vance,” Luce made the case that the president has diminished his
running mate by sending him out to defend the indefensible and putting
him in positions where failure is guaranteed.
“Pity
JD Vance,” it began. “Having advised against Donald Trump’s Iran war,
he was sent to Islamabad to fix it. En route to that doomed cause, the
US vice-president stopped off in Hungary to endorse another — Viktor
Orbán’s re-election campaign. The Iran talks failed and Orbán lost in a
landslide. By the end of that tour from hell, Vance’s approval rating
was the lowest ever for a vice-president at this point in a term.”
Some comments on the article:
user-ek7vge7vp853 minutes agoTrump
only agreed to Vance as a running mate so he could watch the man who
called him "America's Hitler" grovel and kiss his "ring" until the time
came to stab him in the back. Trump never planned to let Vance have any
victories or give him a path to power of his own.
Wendy Grieshop31 minutes agoThe
ONLY reason that Trump ran in 2024 was to cash in on his STOLEN SCOTUS
ruling which kept him eligible. The ONLY reason that he chose Vance was
because he knew that he had to win OHIO.
CeeBeeGeeBee m2 hours agoWe
all saw this coming. I think Trump set him up for these missions. JD
really isn't smart enough on international issues to go out and try and
handle them. But Trumpty Dumpty is stuck because ya can't fire the VP.
Actually, you can ask the v.p. to resign. Regardless, Miss Sassy is sinking. Laura Esposito (DAILY BEAST) reports:
If Donald Trump is going down, his vice president may be going down with him, according to members of Trump’s inner circle.
Those
close to the president are increasingly concerned that Trump’s sinking
favorability—amid his surprise war on Iran and an affordability
crisis—could drag down not only his own standing, but also JD Vance’s
political future, Zeteo reported Monday.
“Trump
is imploding, and he’s probably going to take JD down with him unless
there’s a course correction,” a source described as “close to Trump”
told the outlet.It’s been a
rough few weeks for Vance, 41. The isolationist vice president has
reportedly been at odds with his boss over the bombardment of Iran,
which Trump launched in coordination with Israel—without congressional
approval—on Feb. 28.
A bombshell New York Times report
on Tuesday revealed that Vance was the loudest—and only—voice of
opposition within the White House against launching a full-scale attack,
calling it “a huge distraction of resources” and “massively expensive.”
Vance
was then tasked with publicly defending the Middle East conflict, a
time that has coincided with rising casualties abroad and surging gas
prices at home.
Here's C.I.'s "The Snapshot:"
In February, the city notified Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) that it had shut off water and sewage services to the property until the agency explained how it could operate “without exceeding our limited infrastructure capacity.”
“We’re
against it,” Eric Taylor, the Social Circle city manager, told The
Hill. “Having something come in like this is just really a different
dynamic than what this particular community is about.”
Social Circle, with a population of about 5,500, is by no means an exception; it is one of two communities in Georgia that illustrate a national trend. As the DHS has embarked on a $38.3 billion plan to boost detention capacity by 92,600 beds, communities that back the president’s agenda have said no to housing immigrants in their backyard.
New Jersey, alongside the GOP-leaning township of Roxbury, sued the DHS and ICE in March over a purchased warehouse. Residents of Surprise, Ariz., protested against a 1,500+ bed facility, which the DHS and ICE reduced to 500+ beds last month amid the uproar.
In February, Sen. Roger Wicker (R-Miss.) spoke out against a warehouse conversion plan in Byhalia, Miss. Separately, the Republican executive of Orange County, N.Y., told a January board meeting that “an ICE facility will create chaos and will tax our emergency management and first responders.”
“Just not in their backyard. They’re fine with it somewhere else, they just don’t want it back here,” Social Circle Council member Tyson Jackson said of the opposition in his community — a sentiment apparently shared in many other reliable red districts.
According to a document released by ICE in February, the agency is seeking to stand up eight large-scale detention facilities that each could hold 7,000 to 10,000 detainees for periods averaging less than 60 days, along with 16 smaller regional processing centers to hold up to 1,500 detainees for three to seven days.
In announcing a complete U.S. blockade of Iranian ports, President Trump took a drastically new approach to trying to achieve what he has wanted for weeks — opening the Strait of Hormuz to global traffic.
The president seems to be hoping that the blockade will heap new pressure on Iran after direct talks between U.S. and Iranian officials in Pakistan over the weekend failed to end the war, and he suggested that other countries would join the effort.
But on Monday, there were few volunteers, with only Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel publicly supporting the idea.
Mr. Trump’s proposed blockade “makes no sense,” Spain’s defense minister, Margarita Robles, said in a television interview. “Since this war started, nothing makes sense,” she added. “This is another episode in the downward spiral the world has been dragged into.”
Experts said they doubted that the blockade would get Mr. Trump any closer to an endgame that he could sell as an American victory.
“I’ll save you the waiting period: Iran is not going to capitulate,” said Danny Citrinowicz, a senior researcher at the Institute for National Security Studies in Israel who studies Iran and its proxies. “This regime believes that the damage that will be sustained by this act will be bigger for the U.S. and the international economy than for Iran.”
Imposing a blockade entailed risks for the U.S., he said. It could further increase oil prices, deepening the drag on the global economy. The U.S. interdiction of ships belonging to, say, India or China could cause diplomatic clashes. It will also bring U.S. ships into striking distance of Iran’s missiles and drones, putting American military personnel in harm’s way.
Warren: “Amazon's response reeks of desperation to please Donald Trump…This looks like bribery in plain sight.”
Washington, D.C. — In a new response to Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) and Representative Hank Johnson (D-Ga.), Amazon claimed that there was “no improper” activity in its bid for the new Melania documentary despite what appears to be a corrupt pay-to-play arrangement with the Trump administration. Last month, the lawmakers opened an investigation into Amazon’s investment in the Melania film and questioned whether it was used to secure favorable treatment from the Trump administration on antitrust suits, potential tariff exemptions, foreign trade deals, federal contracts, and tax cuts.
The company refused to explain its massive overpayment for the film’s rights, insisting that it followed a “thorough and competitive bidding process” despite reportedly paying more than three times as the next closest bidder.
Amazon also said that its decision to license the film was “based on the film and series itself — the access, the story, and its cultural and historical relevance,” again providing no business justification for the investment.
In reaction to Amazon’s insufficient response, Senator Warren released the following statement:
“Amazon's response reeks of desperation to please Donald Trump. If there’s nothing corrupt about this deal and the bidding process was truly “competitive”, why won’t Amazon explain why it reportedly paid three times as much as the next highest bidder? The logical explanation is that Amazon is trying to buy the President’s favor by dumping millions into the Trump family’s pockets. This looks like bribery in plain sight, and Amazon must give Congress — and the American people — answers now.”
Representative Hank Johnson (D-Ga.) also released the following statement:
“When we saw the oligarchs and tech bros gather in front-row seats at Trump’s second inauguration – some of whom gave him millions for his re-election campaign – it raised the specter that the rich and powerful were going to wield dangerous levels of power and influence on the nation through their largess to this transactional and corrupt president. Amazon’s ‘nothing-to-see-here’ response makes this fear even more of a reality. If there were truly nothing to see, then Amazon would have answered these basic questions.”
Amazon reportedly invested at least $75 million in the documentary — with reports indicating that about $28 million of that will go directly to Melania Trump. To date, the film has only grossed around $16 million, raising questions about whether Amazon ever planned to break even on the film.
###