One week before that happens, "The Boy Must Live."
If you've watched Fringe all along, you may remember when the Watcher told Walter that "the boy must live." Walter was bringing Peter over from the other earth (after his own son Peter died). So Peter must live.
No.
That was September and he was referring to Michael, the young boy the Fringe crew found a few weeks back.
Until the last ten or so minutes, this was a slower episode. Probably to prepare us for the twists and turns to come.
The gang -- Olivia, Peter, Walter and Astrid -- were in the lab. Remember last time, Michael touched Walter and allowed him to see various things. It also allowed Walter to see events that were erased after (end of season three) Peter stepped into the machine that erased him from both worlds and reset time.
Walter is strangely at peace and also tells Peter that he didn't think he could love him more but now he does. He talked about the memories and he and Peter hugged.
Walter got into the tank (remember season one when Olivia used it for the first time) to try to figure out where Donald was. (Donald is September.) He was able to go back in his memory and look around and then, at Peter's urging, look out the window of Donald's apartment.
He was in Brooklyn. Olivia, Peter and Walter leave (with Michael) for Brooklyn. They go to the apartment complex and knock on the door.
Donald does answer. He explains he was what they call an Observer but was punished and basically medically tortured. All of his powers were taken from him and he was basically human. He explained that Michael (who is from his DNA so his son) is different. To gain more intelligence in the future, the watchers will remove certain things like anger from the brain to use that space. They eventually take out all emotions. But Michael's brain is different and shows a different way. So he can be shown (if I understand this right) to some scientists who will alter the course of time.
Olivia thinks the reset means that Etta (Olivia and Peter's daughter) will be brought back to life. Peter's not so sure.
The watchers? Captain Windmark is summoned by a leader to the future.
He gives a report on Michael and everything. The leader tells him the human's don't matter. There is huge chance they will fail (I think he said 99.9% chance) and Windmark has been sent back to work instead on a master plan. That's what he needs to focus on, forget the humans.
Windmark is feeling anger or obsession for the first time. When he returns to the time (2034?), he does not do as ordered and instead uses all resources to find September (Donald) and the humans.
With Donald, they go to a warehouse for him to retrieve some things. He and Walter go inside. Walter reveals that he has to did (Walter has to). It was in the vision Michael showed him.
He's not telling Peter and Olivia that.
The watchers are at Donald's. A device he carries goes off to alert him. He presses a button and the place explodes but Windmark and his lieutenant manage to teleport outside first.
Windmark orders the tapes watched to find the gang and the area to be road blocked.
Donald leaves them to get more things he's hidden.
They plan to head out of NYC and back to the lab.
But . . .
road blocks.
They get off the street into an alley and Olivia calls Astrid who pulls up the grid. Roadblocks are everywhere. There's no way out. Wait, if they leave the car and head for the train . . .
Olivia walks with Michael reasoning that a woman and her child will draw the least attention. They head for the train and make it into the train car.
Peter and Walter are a little behind and have several close calls.
As they're almost captured, Michael walks out the door of the train to the watchers. Olivia tries to stop him, but he's surprised her and she can't catch him. He's taken to Windmark and that's the end of the episode.
Repeating, this coming Friday, the last two episodes of Fringe air. This is the season finale.
Here's C.I.'s "Iraq snapshot:"
Friday,
January 11, 2012. Chaos and violence continue, Iraq sees another
prison break, Iraqis demonstrate around the country, clerics and
political officials issue statements of support for the protesters,
political leaders make it clear repeatedly that Iraq is on the wrong
path, and more.
As US President Barack Obama prepares for his second term, the Cabinet faces changes. Feminist Majority Foundation issued the following today on the departure of the Secretary of Labor:
For Immediate Release:
January 11, 2013
Contact:
Kari Ross
Kari Ross
703.522.2214
Eleanor Smeal, President of the Feminist Majority Foundation and Feminist Majority
Statement on the Departure of Secretary of Labor Hilda Solis
The
Feminist Majority Foundation and Feminist Majority salute Secretary of
Labor Hilda Solis, the first Latina to head a major federal agency, for
her outstanding accomplishments in fighting for women workers and for
all workers. Solis' leadership was especially important at a time when
the United States was facing the worst recession since the Great
Depression and women workers were, for the first time, roughtly one-half
of the nation's paid workforce. She brought a unique Latina, feminist,
environmentalist and union perspective to the Department. Secretary
Solis made sure women workers were not forgotten as she worked to fight
for and support policies to create more jobs. Never forgetting her own
roots, she found passion for, believed in, and valued the common people
and their struggles for advancement as well as the importance of the
union movement for build the middle class.
Secretary
Solis was always on the front lines fighting for women workers. She
reinvigorated the Women's Bureau, reached out to women's organizations
fighting to increase employment opportunities for women and expanded
funding for community colleges that service millions of low income
women. In funding programs at community colleges, the Labor Department,
as Solis has stated, expanded "employer-specific" job training for
millions of people and "transformed" community colleges into an "engine
of economic growth."
Ms. Magazined heralded
Secretary Solis' appointment with a headline "New Sheriff in Town; the
First Latina to Head Labor will Enforce Fair Treatment for all U.S.
Workers." She did exactly that. The Labor Department, under her
leadership, enforced federal contract compliance regulations and wage
and hour regulations protecting workers, especially women, people of
color, low income individuals, and retirees. The Department Office of
Federal Contract Compliance Programs conducted an impressive number of
investigations and collected a record amount of back wages for workers
who had been denied overtime and leave benefits as well as pay owed them
by their employers. Moreover, the Labor Department under Solis
recorded some $5 billion for retirees and their families.
Solis,
a role model for equal employment, practiced what she preached. She
recruited and hired women and people of color to top leadership
positions in the Department, including her chief of staff, chief
economists, and as leaders of top bureaus, agencies and programs of the
department. Solis, in very difficult times, revived and greatly
strengthened the Department of Labor's legacy for improving workers'
rights and economic justice. The Feminist Majority and Feminist
Majority Foundation look forward to supporting her in new capacities as
she continues her work and passion for working women and men as well as
economic and social justice.
###
After announcing her decision to step down, Hilda Solis offered her thoughts on the position in a series of Tweets including:
As the first Latina to head a major federal agency, it has been a great honor to serve as the nation's 25th secretary of labor.
Thank
you for your talent & dedication. And thank you to the organizers
who ensure workers have a voice on the job and a seat at the table.
We've
accomplished much over the last 4 years, but none of it would have been
possible without our greatest asset: America's workers.
In
Iraq, many things take place that influence the country's direction.
Also true, events outside of Iraq can impact the country as well. For
years now, the Turkish military has been using war planes to bomb
northern Iraq with the stated intent of killing the PKK. Who are the
PKK? Aaron Hess (International Socialist Review) described the PKK in 2008,
"The PKK emerged in 1984 as a major force in response to Turkey's
oppression of its Kurdish population. Since the late 1970s, Turkey has
waged a relentless war of attrition that has killed tens of thousands of
Kurds and driven millions from their homes. The Kurds are the world's
largest stateless population -- whose main population concentration
straddles Turkey, Iraq, Iran, and Syria -- and have been the victims of
imperialist wars and manipulation since the colonial period. While
Turkey has granted limited rights to the Kurds in recent years in order
to accommodate the European Union, which it seeks to join, even these
are now at risk."
Three PKK members were killed yesterday -- as CNN Mohammed Tawfeeq noted in a Tweet.
Police: 3 #Kurdish women shot dead in #Paris - http://CNN.com http://www.cnn.com/2013/01/10/world/europe/france-kurd-deaths/index.html …
The topic was discussed today on The Diane Rehm Show (NPR) by Diane's guest NBC News' Courtney Kube. Excerpt.
Diane Rhem: Courtney, tell us about these Kurdish activists who were slain in Paris on Thursday.
Courtney
Kube: Yeah, it wasn't -- at first -- a well publicized story and then
it really started to break yesterday in the international media. There
were these three Kurdish exiles that were working in Paris. They went
--
Diane Rehm: Female.
Courtney
Kube: Female. All young women. I was astonished, one of them was born
in 1988. I thought, "Wow, how young." But they went missing the other
night. Their friends broke into their offices and they were found to
have been executed. In fact, the French Interior Minister showed up
within hours and he said that they were summarily executed on the site.
So the problem with this is, you know, as in situations like this,
there's all differenst sides and people blaming -- one side blaming the
other. The PKK is saying that they believe the Turkish government --
Turkish nationalist -- who were angry at recent talks between Turkey and
the PKK who don't want the Kurds to have any additional power, autonomy
or rights -- that they did this as a show to break down the talks. The
PKK is -- Or, I'm sorry, the Turkish government is saying that there's
infighting between the PKK, that these people, they are the ones who
are very militant who don't want talks. I mean, whatever side ends up
being correct, if one of the two, what is clear out of this is that the
talks that have just began recently -- Prime Minister [Recep Tayyip]
Erdogan just acknowledged them, that they've been speaking to this PKK
leader who's been jailed in solitary confiencement for the last decade,
that the Intelligence Ministry has been speaking to him to try and
broker some sort of an end to the violence. And those talks are in
serious jeopardy over this incident.
The three women killed were Sakine Cansiz, Fidan Dogan and Leyla Soylemez. Guney Yildiz (BBC News) offers this analysis:
It
is the first time that such a senior member of the PKK has been killed
in Europe. There has been a tacit agreement between the PKK and the
Turkish government that no such high-profile attacks would be carried
out against either senior PKK members or senior members of the
government.
During the 1980s, there were
some attacks believed to be from within the Turkish state against
members of the militant Armenian group Asala, but there have been no
political assassinations targeting the PKK.
The
Paris killings come against the backdrop of fresh peace talks between
jailed PKK leader Abdullah Ocalan and the Turkish government. Those
talks have not been easy and have opponents on both sides.
The
Turkish government says the previous round of peace talks was derailed
because of a clash between Turkish soldiers and the PKK in June 2011.
Thursday's killings will make the current negotiations even more difficult, no matter who might be behind the attack.
Violence continues in Iraq today. Bombings are getting press attention. All Iraq News notes a Babylon roadside bombing targeted police officers today. The Iraq Times, citing a police source, notes police were targeted with a Kirkuk bombing as well; however it ended up killing 1 bystander and injuring another. Trend News Agency reports a Taj bombing has claimed the lives of 3 police officers. In addition, Alsumaria notes that a woman's corpse (burned to death) was found dumped in Sulaymaniyah Province.
Today's primary focus, however, was on an escape. The Iraq Times reports there has been a Taji prison break with 12 prisoners fleeing -- some of whom are said to have been sentenced to death. AP states the inmates escaped through cell windows. Al Bawaba adds, "While sources agree that all of the inmates who broke out of jail on Friday are Iraqi, the number is disputed. An interior ministry official put the number at 12 while a military source claimed there were 16 escapees." An unnamed military officer tells AFP, "They escaped from Taji prison after they got hold of the guards' weapons. It could be there was cooperation from the guards."
Protests continued in Iraq today. AFP's Prashant Rao Tweeted:
Nouri used the extra-Constitutional Tigris Operation Command to suppress movement in Kirkuk, Alsumaria reports,
and the military force prevented people from entering. They cut off
roads in an attempt to stop those marching in Hawija as well.
Demonstration organizer Banyan Obeidi tells the network that the Tigris
Operation Command was not present to provide protection but to prevent
the demonstrators and to block them." In Nineveh Province, Alsumaria reports
the people turned out following morning prayers and that they renewed
their call for the innocent prisoners and detainees to be released and
for those officials who have raped and tortured women in Iraqi prisons
to be prosecuted. Nineveh Province is where Nouri has sent the military
in an attempt to stop the protests. But the governor of the province,
Atheel al-Nujaifi (also spelled Ethel al-Nujaifi) has refused to allow
the protests to be stopped and declared this week, "I am not an employee
of Nouri al-Maliki. I am servant to the people of Nineveh."
al-Nujaifi is the brother of Speaker of Parliament Osama al-Nujaifi.
He is also in conflict with Nouri who, in 2011, began demanding that
al-Nujaifi step down as governor. Currently, al-Nujaifi is demanding
that Nouri hand over a soldier to the province, the soldier raped a
young girl. Nouri's refused to honor the arrest warrant. al-Nuajifi is
also demanding a serious investigation into Monday's protest
when Nouri's military ignored al-Nujaifi and the Provincial Council's
orders that the square in downtown Mosul be opened to the protesters,
the military ignored it and moved in injuring at least four protesters
in the process.
Omar
al-Saleh: It's the third consecutive week of protests and the numbers
are increasing. Tens of thousands of protesters took to the streets
across Sunni provinces including parts of Baghdad. But despite the
heavy security presence and attempts by the army to prevent people from
reaching mosques, many showed up for Friday prayers. At Umm al-Qura
mosque, politicians and clerics called on protesters to carry on.
Rafiaa
al-Issawi: I warn the army against being a tool to curb protesters. I
call on you to carry on until your demands are met.
Omar
al-Saleh: In Ramadi, the birth place of the protests, tens of
thousands continued their sit-in. They warned Prime Minister Nouri
al-Maliki of using force against them. In Samarra and Mosul, thousands
more demanded an end to what they describe as a marginalization of
Sunnis. They also want the abolishment of an anti-terrorism law which
they say targets them. And the release of Sunni prisoners. The
government's stance is that all demands should be dealt with according
to the Iraqi Consittution. It blames foreign countries of supporting
the protesters to ignite a sectarian strife.
Alsumaria reports
that cleric and leader of the Islamic Supreme Council delivered a
sermon today calling for dialogue among all the parties and refusing to
lay the blame on protesters. Also weigh in? Grand Ayatollah Ali
al-Sistani whose message today, delivered by Sheikh Abdel Mahdi
al-Karbalai during morning prayers, was a call for unity and
responsibility. Alsumaria reports
he stated that the political blocs are responsible for the current
problems and that the politicians and the security services must
exercise restraint and utilize wisdom. He warned against attacking the
protesters. All Iraq News notes
that he spoke of the need for government institutions to be independent
and to preserve the independence so that no one official could exploit
the powers of the government for personal gain. Cleric and movement
leader Moqtada al-Sadr also weighed in today. Kitabat notes
that Moqtada explained the popular protests in Mosul, Salahuddin and
Anbar are not against government but against policies and that it is the
right of the Iraqi to speak their beliefs. He noted that there had
been some early mistakes (referring to some slogans and banners in early
protests -- they generally expressed the not uncommon belief in Iraq
that things were better before the US invasion) but that these are cries
to rally the nation. He stated that Nouri is the one throwing out
obstacles. Alsumaria reports
Minister Rafia al-Issawi and Sunni Endowment president Ahmed
Abdul-Ghafoor Samarrai showed their support by attending a demonstration
in Baghdad following morning prayers. All Iraq News reports
Deputy Prime Minister Saleh al-Mutlaq issued a statement today
declaring that force should not be used against the protesters. Others
went further. For example, Kitabat reports
Sunni Sheikh Abdul Malik Saadi stated that it is the resposibility of
Iraq's rulers to hear the protesters' demands, that it is the right of
citizens to exercise their rights, and that the security forces are to
provide security and their role is not to target the protesters but to
protect them. The Iraqi people are partners in the country, the Sheikh
noted, citizens, military, they are partners. He called on the
protesters to be strong and patient, not to take up arms and he called
on the military to protect the protesters.
Of course, there are two groups of protesters in Iraq currently. First you have the vast group of thousands of legitimate protesters asking for a better Iraq and then you have the tiny bands of Nouri's goons who sometimes make it into the 'hundreds.' Both were out today.
The tiny faux group registered the most in Najaf. Let's call them the Pat Boones. A sign of how small they are? All Iraq News notes "dozens." But then few want to be an ass kisser. Visit any high school and ask for a show of hands if you doubt it. The Pat Boones are demanding that things stay the same and that mass arrests continue. Aswat al-Iraq adds that they are calling "for boycotting Turkish and Qatari companies. They found support from State of Law MP Ali Mirza who called for his "government to deny work for Turkish and Qatari companies, as well as reviewing diplomatic relations in order to cut off relations with them." Press TV notes a small turn out in Basra as well.
Of course, there are two groups of protesters in Iraq currently. First you have the vast group of thousands of legitimate protesters asking for a better Iraq and then you have the tiny bands of Nouri's goons who sometimes make it into the 'hundreds.' Both were out today.
The tiny faux group registered the most in Najaf. Let's call them the Pat Boones. A sign of how small they are? All Iraq News notes "dozens." But then few want to be an ass kisser. Visit any high school and ask for a show of hands if you doubt it. The Pat Boones are demanding that things stay the same and that mass arrests continue. Aswat al-Iraq adds that they are calling "for boycotting Turkish and Qatari companies. They found support from State of Law MP Ali Mirza who called for his "government to deny work for Turkish and Qatari companies, as well as reviewing diplomatic relations in order to cut off relations with them." Press TV notes a small turn out in Basra as well.
By contrast, Kitabat notes "tens of thousands" of real protesters turned out forllowing Friday prayers. Alsumaria notes thousands marched in Salahuddin Province to show their support with the Anbar Province protesters who are demonstrating and continue their sit-in. The outlet notes that local officials, religious scholars and tribal leaders are part of the demonstrations and that the demands include the release of the innocent prisoners and detainees, the prosecution of those who have tortured or raped Iraqi women in the Iraqi prisons and detention centers, and for the government to change its current course. Salam Faraj and Jafia Abduljabbar (AFP) report that protests took place in Ramadi, Samarra, Mosul, Tikrit, Adhamiyah and Ghazaliyah and "Protesters also blocked off the highway linking Iraq to Syria and Jordan for a 20th day in western Anbar province, while in the northern city of Kirkuk, hundreds of protesters waved banners and raised flags". Patrick Markey and Suadad al-Salhy (Reuters) observe, "Three weeks of mass protests reflect deep discontent among Sunnis who say Maliki's Shi'ite-led government has marginalised their minority community, increasing worries Iraq may slide back into the sectarian violence of its recent past." The World Tribune notes, "The protesters blocked a highway to Jordan and Syria, which halted trade and passengers to and from Iraq."
In
one of the more surprising moments of unity today, the KDP and PUK
declared their support for the protesters. The Kurdistan Democratic
Party and the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan are the two big political
parties -- political rivals -- in the KRG. Iraqi President Jalal
Talabani (currently receiving medical treatment in Germany) is the
leader of the PUK while Massoud Barzani is the President of the
Kurdistan Regional Government (semi-autonomous region in northern Iraq)
and the leader of the KDP. Alsumaria reports
the two parties came together today to make a joint declaration of
support for the protesters and to insist that the course the country
is on is wrong and unacceptable.
The Iraq Times reports that Ayad Allawi, leader of Iraqiya (political slate that came in first in the 2010 parliamentary elections) held a press conference today to talk about the crisis that has led to demonstrations throughout Iraq. He noted that Iraqiya and he himself had been sounding alarms for some time about what was taking place. He noted the policies (being implemented by Nouri) were dividing the country and he called for unity to protect Iraq. Iraqiya won in 2010 as part of Iraq's rejection of sectarianism. This trend could be seen in the 2009 provincial elections as well.
This embrace of a national identity
could have been fostered, could have been encouraged. The US government
refused to do that. There was more concern in the Obama White House
that Nouri al-Maliki get a second term than that the voters in Iraq be
listened to, that the Constitution be honored or that democracy be
assisted. The White House backed Nouri who threw a tantrum which lasted
over eight months as he refused to allow the Iraqi government to move
forward. While he dug his feet in refusing to allow a new prime
minister to be named, Barack had the US government spend their time in
Iraq trying to force the various political actors to accept a second
term for Nouri. Since he didn't win the election, the Constitution
couldn't allow this. So the White House came up with the Erbil
Agreement to get around the voters and the Constitution. The Erbil
Agreement was a legal contract that the White House assured political
leaders was binding and that it would have the US government's full
support. In the contract, political leaders agree to allow Nouri to
have a second term as prime minister. In exchange, Nouri agrees to
allow various things to happen such as he agrees to implement Article
140 of the Iraqi Constitution -- a census and referendum will be held in
Kirkuk to determine who has claim to the disputed area.
The
things he agrees to in this contract are largely things he was already
supposed to do. Article 140, for example, is the Constitution and he was
supposed to have implemented that no later than the end of 2007 -- it's
written into the Constitution, that date. From 2006 to 2010, Nouri had
every opportunity to implement Article 140. He refused to do so.
Why in the world would the Kurds (who see Kirkuk as their region) believe Nouri would now implement it?
Because
the White House voched for the contract. The White House swore -- US
Vice President Joe Biden personally gave Iraqi President Jalal Talabani
his word -- that the Erbil Agreement would be followed, the US
government would insist upon it.
In addition
to the White House insisting they would back the contract, the White
House also used shame on the Iraqi politicians. For over eight months,
no government had been seated. An election took place, no one was
seated from it. It was the record at that time. It was embarrassing
and the White House played that angle and they also told the various
political blocs that Nouri had no intention of stepping down so the
stalemate could go on for months more. 'Be the adult,' the other
political blocs were told, 'and let Iraq move forward.'
So
they signed this contract (November 2010) and immediately after Nouri
was named prime minister-designate. This is November. Nouri
immediately cancels the planned census for December 2010. It's just
temporary, he insists. And these other things he's supposed to do, it's
too soon, but he will do them. Ayad Allawi and Iraqiya called him out
but the press rushed to cover for Nouri. Even when Nouri couldn't name a
Cabinet in 30 days, the press covered for Nouri insisting in January
2011 that he would name a Minister of Defense, a Minister of National
Security and a Minister of Interior in a matter of weeks. Yet back in July, Mohammed Tawfeeq (CNN) observed,
"Shiite Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki has struggled to forge a lasting
power-sharing agreement and has yet to fill key Cabinet positions,
including the ministers of defense, interior and national security,
while his backers have also shown signs of wobbling support." That's
still true.
Nouri
didn't follow the contract. He used the Erbil Agreement to get his
second term and then trashed it. By the summer of 2011, that was
obvious to Moqtada al-Sadr, the Kurds and Iraqiya who were publicly
calling him out for his refusal to follow the Erbil Agreement. And the
US? Silent. Forgotten and ignored were all the promises that the Erbil
Agreement was a binding contract and that the White House would stand
behind it. It's not only destroyed the way political leaders see the US
government, it's harmed Iraq, denying democracy, making a mockery out
of the Iraqi Constitution and telling voters that they don't determine
who rules, the US government does.
For more on that, you can refer to John Barry's "'The Engame' Is A Well Researched, Highly Critical Look at U.S. Policy in Iraq" (Daily Beast):
Washington has little political and no military influence over these developments [in Iraq]. As Michael Gordon and Bernard Trainor charge in their ambitious new history of the Iraq war, The Endgame, Obama's administration sacrificed political influence by failing in 2010 to insist that the results of Iraq's first proper election be honored: "When the Obama administration acquiesced in the questionable judicial opinion that prevented Ayad Allawi's bloc, after it had won the most seats in 2010, from the first attempt at forming a new government, it undermined the prospects, however slim, for a compromise that might have led to a genuinely inclusive and cross-sectarian government."
Washington has little political and no military influence over these developments [in Iraq]. As Michael Gordon and Bernard Trainor charge in their ambitious new history of the Iraq war, The Endgame, Obama's administration sacrificed political influence by failing in 2010 to insist that the results of Iraq's first proper election be honored: "When the Obama administration acquiesced in the questionable judicial opinion that prevented Ayad Allawi's bloc, after it had won the most seats in 2010, from the first attempt at forming a new government, it undermined the prospects, however slim, for a compromise that might have led to a genuinely inclusive and cross-sectarian government."
Today in DC at the US State Dept press briefing, spokesperson Victoria Nuland was asked about Iraq and we'll note this.
QUESTION:
Victoria, the schism within the Iraqi coalitions and political forces
and so on is getting wider. And in fact, you talked about the Sunni/Shia
divide in Pakistan. It's also getting quite obvious in Iraq. Some
people are calling for the government to dissolve. Some people are
calling for the parliament to dissolve. Maliki's saying that he's
collected 130 names from the parliament to call for a new elections or
dissolve it and so on. Are these just parliamentarian machinations, or
are the they the birth pangs of democracy, or are we seeing the country
being split along sectarian lines?
MS.
NULAND: Well, we've talked about this quite a bit over the last few
weeks, if not even before Christmas. Obviously, we're concerned about
increased political tensions inside Iraq. We have continually met with
people on all sides, calling on them to exercise restraint, to respect
the right of peaceful expression, to talk to each other, to engage in a
broad national dialogue on the issues that divide them, and particularly
that all parties ought to avoid any actions that subvert the rule of
law or that provoke ethnic and sectarian tensions or risk undermining
the significant progress that Iraq has made or the Iraqi constitution,
which is obviously very carefully and delicately balanced. So we will
continue the advocacy efforts in that direction that Ambassador Steve
Beecroft makes every single day with Iraqis of all stripes.
Any
US governemnt official pontificating about "rule of law" looks like an
idiot to Iraqis because the White House disregarded the Iraqi
Constitution and the will of the voters to keep Nouri prime minister.
As for US Ambassador Stephen Beecroft, All Iraq News reports
he visited the office of Ammar al-Hakim, leader of the Islamic Supreme
Council of Iraq, Thursday and that he and al-Hakim discussed the need to
preserve calm and not escalate the current crisis."