Wednesday, July 06, 2022

No, she shouldn't run again

What's one of the worst partisan notions?  That Hillary Clinton should run for president again.  

She shouldn't.  She's run twice.  She's failed each time.  Last time, she was too lazy to campaign in states she should have won -- like Wisconsin.

She's a failure and she's a loser and she's corrupt as hell.

Yet, Douglas Schoen is saying Hillary Clinton is the best bet for a Democratic Party win in 2024. 

Do you believe it? 

I asked C.I. and she responded that the press is an a dishonest liar for promoting the man's claim without noting how wrong he has consistently been including in his predictions regarding then-Senator Barack Obama in the primaries. She also noted that he was partners with Mark Penn which brings up the Blackwater issue all over again. We don't need Hillary to begin with but Schoen's a liar. He even has the nerve to say that in the face of Roe we need a strong champion of women like Hillary. Which women did she champion? In the months after the 2004 election, she spent her time trying to downgrade abortion rights. It's interesting that he failed to say how much money she had supplied him over the years. C.I. said to look at THE NEW YORK TIMES report on Mark Penn leaving Hillary's 2008 campaign and see if it didn't include that PBA worked for Hillary? It did

His polling firm, Penn, Schoen and Berland Associates, will continue to provide polling and advice to the campaign, the statement said. Geoff Garin, who has been conducting polling for the campaign and will continue to provide data, and Howard Wolfson, Mrs. Clinton’s longtime communications director, will coordinate the campaign’s strategic message from now on, the statement added.

So someone who has repeatedly paid him over the years is now who he is hawking for president.

Wonder if she's paying him again?

Maybe they can work on another fake 'dossier' and paralyze the country again?

Plus, we don't elect sore losers. She refused to admit defeat and promoted conspiracies instead. Go away, is what I say. 

And seriously, this goes for Donald Trump too, if you can't accept losing, you shouldn't be able to run again.

She lost in 2016 and spent four years pretending otherwise.  He lost in 2020 and still can't get honest.

If you don't know how to be a good sport, don't run. 


Here's C.I.'s "Iraq snashot:"


 Wednesday, July 6, 2022.  Free speech rights to include the right to protest, Clarence Thomas and his cohorts don't feel loved, Iraq still struggles to form a government and much more.


Nick Barrickman (WSWS) reports:

On Saturday, Supreme Court Marshal Gail A. Curley sent letters to the Republican governors of Maryland and Virginia demanding that the states crack down on protests that have swelled outside of the homes of the Supreme Court’s right-wing members following the overturning of Roe v. Wade last month.

Protests have remained a constant outside the homes of the court’s various far-right members in the months after a memo revealed the plan to strike down the constitutional right to an abortion.

In the letters, Curley, a West Point graduate and former military lawyer who has also been assigned the job of hunting down the source of the Supreme Court’s May memo leak, demanded that state officials in Maryland and Virginia “prohibit picketing at the homes of Supreme Court Justices.”

“For weeks on end,” she complained, “large groups of protesters chanting slogans, using bullhorns, and banging drums have picketed Justices’ homes” in the two jurisdictions. This, the officer claimed, “is exactly the kind of conduct that the [state and local] laws prohibit.”

As an example, Curley cited a Montgomery County, Maryland, ordinance that declares a “person or group of persons must not picket in front of or adjacent to any private residence.” Instead, picketers must march “without stopping at any particular private residence.”


Oh, that's so sad.  Some people are disturbed, are they?  That's just so unfair.  You know what, Gail, I don't think most people give a damn and, more to the point, your little ordinances and codes, I think The Constitution actually trumps those and I don't see any 'due process' reasoning that would allow your clients special access to the law. 

It's time for the garbage to come back down to earth.  You know, the place where a lot of people are suffering.  Mike Ervin (THE PROGRESSIVE) notes some of  the concerns of the disabled and challenged communities:


 

“People with disabilities have the fundamental right to make decisions about our lives and bodies . . . this includes the right to decide whether or not to continue a pregnancy,” the statement reads. “People with disabilities are more likely to experience sexual assault, and people with some disabilities face increased and serious health risks from pregnancy. Disabled people need and deserve access to affirming and accessible reproductive health care services, including abortion.”

One of the groups that signed on to the statement, the Disability Rights Education and Defense Fund, spoke out forcefully on its own, too, in a statement that began, “Disabled people have the right to self-determination and bodily autonomy. We have the right to make our own decisions. Our human rights include reproductive rights. Abortion rights are disability rights.”

The National Disability Rights Network also put out a short statement that said, “Today it was the right to an abortion, tomorrow it could be other important rights like choice of who one can marry or access to other types of reproductive health. For people with disabilities, it might also mean whether or not they have a say in being sterilized, or whom they have intimate relations with, or the choice to live in the community. . . . This uncertainty that the Supreme Court can take away rights that people have had for decades is bad for all American society, including people with disabilities in so many different ways.”

 



What Clarence Thomas and others did impacts lives.  Now they're  bothered that some protesters are picketing.  Tough.  You decided to overturn ROE and you are out of step with the American people.  The American people have every right to protest and I don't care if it disturbs your peace, you've more than disturbed the peace of millions.

 

Are the protesters making you realize that you're not liked?  Well you're not.  Consider that a gift of reality.


Here's another thing -- stop wasting US tax dollars on your stupid and meaningless investigation.  The American people have not screamed "WHO LEAKED IT!!"  We don't care.  Stop wasting our money.  It was leaked.  The ruling has been issued.  It's over.  


You think you're so much more important than you are and you're conducting a war on a Whistle Blower.  What a sad and pathetic court you've become.  No longer trusted by the American people, suffering a double digit loss in trust since last year alone.  


You brought it on yourself.  Stop whining to state authorities and live with the world you've created.  Congress has already passed legislation to fund your protection.  What a bunch of cry babies.  Hey, here's a thought, are the protests disrupting your life?  I bet a lot of them would go home if you retired.  So you need peace?  Announce your retirement.

And shame on you if you pretend to be a free speech advocate but for some reason have spent over two weeks now whining on behalf of the Supreme Court.  First Amendment includes the right to protest.  It is a free speech right.

Branko Marcetic (JACOBIN) notes:


As an increasingly rogue Supreme Court snatched the remnants of the right to abortion away from 40 million women around the country, party leadership boldly ruled out doing much about it. President Joe Biden wouldn’t expand the number of judges on the court or curb its jurisdiction, as progressives like Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-NY) and Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-MA) suggested. He and his team fret that this “would be politically polarizing” ahead of the midterms and “undermine public trust in institutions like the Supreme Court” — the implication being that the court’s attack on abortion rights somehow did neither of those.

As calls to eliminate the Senate filibuster and pass Roe into law grew louder, the Biden administration ruled that out too, dispatching Vice President Kamala Harris to CNN to deliver the bad news. “What do you say to Democratic voters who argue, ‘Wait a minute, we worked really hard to elect a Democratic president and vice president, a Democrat-led House, a Democrat-led Senate — do it now’?” asked Dana Bash.

“But do what now? What now?” replied Harris, who went on to insist the votes weren’t there to eliminate the filibuster and ruled out using the presidential bully pulpit to get them. 

Ocasio-Cortez and others had suggested a creative move: putting abortion clinics on federal lands in states where it was illegal. Was that something the administration might consider? “It’s not right now what we are discussing,” said Harris. Elsewhere, administration officials expressed worry that taking such a step would open those seeking abortions to prosecution or violate the Hyde Amendment, which bars using federal money to fund abortions. (On the last point, it was up to, once more, Ocasio-Cortez to explain why that wasn’t the case.)

Democratic Socialists of America (DSA) member Representative Cori Bush (D-MO) and others have called on Biden to declare a public health emergency as a result of Roe being overturned, something that could open the way to paying patients’ travel expenses. So far, the administration hasn’t done anything of the sort, with one White House advisor warning that if it took that step, “It’s very possible that the next incumbent of the Oval Office would declare an emergency for the life of fetuses,” which was “exactly the kind of politicization of public health that we really need to avoid.” In other words, yet more action stymied by a misguided, conservative obsession with preserving norms and institutions.

A slew of such novel ideas has now been suggested by individual members of the party. What’s notable is the near-total absence of an echo from the White House, even though practically the entire globe has known for two whole months Roe would be overturned.


The latest polling shows Joe Biden with 36% approval rating, as Ruth noted last night.  He won't codify ROE (put it into law), inflation is out of control, he has wasted billions of tax dollars on Ukraine -- didn't Barack Obama it wasn't in the US national interest -- and it just gets worse.

Nick Beams (WSWS) explains:


There is a rising tide of warnings that the US, Europe and other areas of the world are rapidly moving towards a recession as significant data point in that direction.

Under the underline “No more whispers,” Politico reported on Monday: “From Wall Street to Washington, whispers about a coming economic slump have risen to nearly a roar as the Federal Reserve ramps up its battle against the highest inflation in four decades.”

The article cited price spikes—inflation in the US is 8.6 percent—aggressive interest rate hikes which have led to the worst performance by Wall Street’s S&P for the first half year since 1970 and a fall in consumer confidence to a record low.

Economists, it continued, were not only worried that a downturn will happen, but that it will happen soon.

With so much economic activity in the US economy, both on the business and consumer side, dependent on credit, the interest rate hikes carried out so far are having a significant effect.


And here's Andre Damon (WSWS):


The New York Times reported Monday that dozens of US ex-military personnel are operating on the ground in Ukraine and that retired senior US officers are directing portions of the Ukrainian war effort from within the country.

Coming after revelations that the United States was directly involved in coordinating and planning the assassination of Russian generals and the sinking of the Moskva, the flagship of the Russian Black Sea fleet, the report further refutes the false claim by the Biden administration that the United States is not at war with Russia.

In its report, the Times wrote:

Americans are in Ukraine. An unknown number are fighting on the front lines. Others volunteer to be members of casualty evacuation teams, bomb disposal specialists, logistics experts and trainers. At least 21 Americans have been wounded in combat since the war started, according to a nonprofit organization that evacuates them. Two have been killed, two have been captured and one is missing in action.

In February, US President Joe Biden said, “Our forces are not and will not be engaged in a conflict with Russia in Ukraine.” In March, Biden reiterated, “The idea that we’re going to send in offensive equipment and have planes and tanks … going in with American pilots and American crews, just understand, don’t kid yourselves, no matter what you all say, that’s called World War III.”

Since that announcement, the United States has provided over 200 armored personnel carriers and over 20 helicopters to Ukraine, as well as M109 self-propelled armored howitzers, Harpoon anti-ship missiles and HIMARS long-range missiles.

In addition to these military armaments, it is now clear that the United States has sent troops. The US military claims that these forces, including one colonel and one lieutenant colonel, are operating on their own and are not under the command of the US military.

But these denials are a lie, meant to deceive the American people, who overwhelmingly oppose their government going to war with Russia. The officers admitted as much, telling the Times that their actions give the United States “plausible deniability.”


Joe Biden's war of choice.  It's destroying the economy.  It's destroying the country.  But, hey, Sean Penn loves it.  So, good, right?


Wrong.  And they should all be ashamed of themselves.  


Ajamu Baraka points out:


Hey Biden, if you are opposed to gun violence why are you sending guns to Ukraine? Look, if you can culturally accommodate the kind of warmongering that has gripped this country you are immersed in normalized violence so stop playing surprised when it blows back.


Moving over to Iraq, Mohammad Ali Shabani Tweets:


NEW: Almost 10 months after parliamentary elections, #Iraq remains without a 2022 budget as new govt has yet to be formed. Will lawmakers simply skip 2022 budget and instead start focusing on next year's budget? Excellent breakdown of what's going on.


THE NEW ARAB offers:


Public protests in October 2019 swept the southern and central provinces of Iraq. Protesters were demanding better living conditions, amendments to the country’s election law, and holding early elections.

More than 600 people were killed by Iraqi security forces and militias. Consequently, Iraq’s then-elected prime minister Adel Abdul Mahdi was forced to resign and Mustafa al-Kadhimi was appointed as PM to pave the way for snap elections that were held in October last year.

But it seems that Sadr will choose escalation and public protests in order to prevent his opponents from forming their own consensus cabinet.

Sadr in a statement on 22 June refuted allegations that he made the withdrawal decision under the direct threat of Iran, but he admitted for the first time that pro-Iran militia groups have been using Iraq’s judiciary as a political tool and pressuring non-Shia political blocs.  

Salih Mohmmed al-Iraqi, a controversial personality on Twitter thought to be close to Sadr, in early July first identified the reasons that made the Shia leader withdraw from Iraqi politics, mainly accusing parliament speaker Mohammed Halbusi and KDP leader Masoud Barzani of "treason" in what they promised Sadr.


First off, The October Revolution did not begin with Moqtada.  He waited weeks to glom onto it as he sought to see how popular it was.  By the time he threw his support behind it, it was already massive and he was just riding the coat tails.  If the article -- which repeatedly notes that massive protest  -- is trying to tie to that to Moqtada, that's a mistake.  And after he gave support, he ordered the protests to end.  And they ignored him.  And then he started lecturing about how they shouldn't allow men and women to protest together.  And they mocked him.  


And, yes, Iran did order him to exit. 


We're going to wind down with this from Patrick Wintour's report for THE GUARDIAN:


Turkey should face charges in front of the international court of justice for being complicit in acts of genocide against the Yazidi people, while Syria and Iraq failed in their duty to prevent the killings, an investigation endorsed by British human rights lawyer Helena Kennedy has said.

The groundbreaking report, compiled by a group of prominent human rights lawyers, is seeking to highlight the binding responsibility states have to prevent genocide on their territories, even if they are carried out by a third party such as Islamic State (IS).

The lawyers, grouped under the title of the Yazidi Justice Committee (YJC), said there was accountability under international law for states to prevent the crime of genocide under the Genocide Convention. Sir Geoffrey Nice QC, chair of the YJC, described the genocide of the Yazidi people as “madness heaped on evil”.

“Mechanisms in place could have saved the Yazidis from what is now part of their past, and part of their past partial destruction,” he said.

It is widely accepted that genocide was attempted against the Yazidis, a religious minority, from 2013 in Iraq and Syria. The report, which followed a three-year inquiry that investigated the conduct of 13 countries, concluded three of them failed in their duty to take reasonable steps to prevent the genocide.

In the case of Turkey, the committee went further by accusing its leaders of being complicit in the massacres, alleging it failed to police its borders to halt the free flow of IS fighters, including a significant number of Turkish nationals. Turkish officials have said the criticisms are baseless.

The committee claimed that from April 2014, Turkish officials turned a blind eye to the sale, transfer and enslavement of Yazidi women and children, and helped train fighters affiliated with IS to fight its Kurdish enemies in Syria, so strengthening the perpetrators of the genocide.



The following sites updated:


Tuesday, July 05, 2022

TRACKING EDITH, Jonathan Cook, THIRD

In "Media: RIP Black Agenda Report?," Ava and C.I. note the documentary TRACKING EDITH. I had never heard of it so I went to AMAZON and streamed it. Wow. Edith is Edith Tudor-Hart who was a famous British photographer and who was also a . . . KGB spy. It really is a fascinating documentary.


This is from WIKIPEDIA:

Tudor-Hart was instrumental in recruiting members of the Cambridge Spy ring, which damaged British intelligence from World War II through to its discovery in the late 1960s. While working as a photographer she also acted as a courier.[13] Her rather unsubtle codename was "Edith". Tudor-Hart had met Arnold Deutsch in Vienna in 1926, and with him she worked in the OMS, the International Liaison Department of the Comintern.[citation needed]

Tudor-Hart was placed under surveillance by Special Branch after October 1931 when she was observed attending a demonstration in Trafalgar Square.[13] Tudor-Hart was of interest because of her friendship with Litzi Friedmann, made when she moved to London. Arnold Deutsch discussed with Edith and Litzi the recruitment of Soviet spies. Litzi suggested her husband, Kim Philby[14] with whom she had arrived in London from Vienna in May 1934. Tudor-Hart had spotted him as a potential Communist agent during his stay in Vienna, where he was a sympathiser of the Social Democrats who waged a civil war against the government of Engelbert Dollfuss. According to her report on Philby's file, through her own contacts with the Austrian underground Tudor Hart ran a swift check for the NKVD and, when this proved positive introduced him to "Otto" (Deutsch's code name).[15][16][17] Deutsch immediately recommended... "that he pre-empt the standard operating procedure by authorising a preliminary personal sounding out of Philby."[18] She also helped to recruit Arthur Wynn in 1936.[19]

She acted as an intermediary for Anthony Blunt and Bob Stewart when the rezidentura at the Soviet Embassy in London suspended its operations in February 1940.[citation needed] In 1938–39 Burgess used her to contact Russian intelligence in Paris.[13]


I hope that makes you want to see it.

And this is from Jonathan Cook (MPN):

Earlier this month, Russia banned 29 British journalists, including several from the BBC and The Guardian, on the grounds that they were “associated with the defense complex”. That claim was not, at least in all cases, quite as preposterous as was widely assumed.

In part one of this two-part series, we saw how the Guardian’s Luke Harding – one of the journalists banned by Russia – has promoted entirely unsubstantiated smear stories that have hewn closely to the agenda of Western intelligence services. Harding even wrote a prominent Russiagate book and could not defend its basic claims when challenged by independent journalist Aaron Maté.

Although Russia’s ban provoked a predictable, self-righteous backlash from the U.K. media – and was adduced as further evidence of Russian president Vladimir Putin’s authoritarian tendencies – Moscow was, in fact, mirroring earlier bans by the British authorities and the European Union on Russian state-sponsored media. None of the British journalists now barred from Russia raised their voices in protest at the banning of the English-language broadcasts and the websites of RT and Sputnik. 

In popular imagination, cultivated jointly by Western establishment media and Western intelligence agencies, both outlets are staffed by Russian spooks strong-arming a few impressionable Westerners with Stalinist tendencies. The reality is very different. RT wants to have influence in the West, and the only way to achieve that is by recruiting credible Western journalists who have trenchant criticisms of the Western national-security state and its war industries but cannot – for that very reason – find a platform in the establishment media at home. RT might not be the best place to get a neutral view of what Russia is up to, but it had attracted a growing audience in the West by providing an outlet for disillusioned Western journalists who are ready to paint a realistic picture of the failings of their own states. 

One of RT’s journalists, for example, was Chris Hedges, a former foreign correspondent for The New York Times. He has had a long and distinguished journalistic career and has won major journalism awards. Nonetheless, six years of his Emmy-nominated “On Contact” programme for RT America – interviewing major public figures – was erased from Youtube’s channel overnight.

In part one, we considered the cases of two celebrated British journalists – Paul Mason and Carole Cadwalladr – who were revealed to be covertly colluding with Western intelligence services. Not only that, but they had used those contacts to try to harm other journalists who have been taking on the British and U.S. security states. They had been effectively recruited – or in Mason’s case, possibly recruited himself – to a covert, and dirty, information war. The paradox is that, while Cadwalladr and Mason have been accusing – without evidence – journalists in the West of colluding with foreign intelligence agencies, they themselves have been colluding with their own intelligence services to smear other reporters. If Russian intelligence needs a troll farm to spread disinformation, Western intelligence can rely, it seems, on compliant celebrity journalists in British mainstream outlets to do the same work.

 


New content went up at THIRD last night:


Ava and C.I. examined MS. MARVEL and DISNEY+'s troubling portrayal of female heroes.
We all wrote this piece about the fake asses.
Ava and C.I. noted that non-Black Danny Haiphong shouldn't be the face of BLACK AGENDA REPORT -- especially after doing 20 shows in a row without a single African-American guest.
Ty takes on Glenn Greenwald
Katie Halper's recent winning streak of powerful YOUTUBE reports.

A repost of what C.I. wrote the day the DOBBS decision came down.


Here's C.I.'s "Iraq snapshot:"


Tuesday, July 5, 2022.  The US government takes no holiday in Joe Biden's persecution of Julian Assange, Iraq faces more disasters -- some from nature, some from corruption -- and look who may be returning as prime minister -- the name the western press banned themselves from using for months and months.


The US government may have taken a day off yesterday for the July 4th holiday but it continued to persecute Julian Assange.  The persecution is so ingrained and accepted at this point that no one ever asks at a White House press briefing why US President Joe Biden continues to persecute Julian?  They can't ask it at a presidential press conference because (a) Joe can't really handle those and (b) the rare times he takes a question or two from the press, it's been decided ahead of time who he will call on and what they will ask.


When you put a senile and elderly man in the White House, you have to go to great lengths to make the people think he can function.  

Jonathan P Baird writes the editors of THE CONCORD MONITOR:

I believe the hatred and anger stirred up has confused the public’s view about what is at stake in Assange’s legal case. The government is turning investigative journalism into a criminal act. Assange, through Wikileaks, published classified documents in 2010. He didn’t leak them, Chelsea Manning did that.

Wikileaks published hundreds of thousands of documents about the Afghanistan and Iraq wars. The documents revealed the U.S. had killed hundreds of innocent civilians in these wars. Wikileaks released the infamous Collateral Murder video which showed 2007 footage of U.S. soldiers gleefully murdering a crowd of Iraqi civilians and two Reuters journalists. The Iraq war logs also showed over 66,000 Iraqi civilians were murdered by Iraqi forces.

In addition, the documents exposed the torture of prisoners at Guantanamo Bay. Over 150 innocent Afghans and Pakistanis were held for years without charges. Prisoners included an 89-year-old man and a 14-year-old boy. The files revealed the government was holding prisoners to try and extract intelligence. The government relied heavily on evidence obtained from people who had been tortured, including at black sites. The files showed that many of those being held at Guantanamo weren’t considered dangerous.

Without Wikileaks, none of this information would have been made public. Knowing your government is conducting state torture at black sites and at Guantanamo is not some minor detail. So far, U.S. authorities have been unable to name one person who could have been shown to have died as a result of these disclosures.


We'll note this Tweet.

Publishing the truth is NOT a crime. FREE JULIAN ASSANGE NOW
Image
Image
Image
Image



Thomas Scripps (WSWS) notes:

WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange has appealed to the High Court against his extradition order. Home Secretary Priti Patel signed off on his removal to the United States on June 17.

Such an appeal would likely begin to address the real issues of democratic rights at stake in the more than a decade long persecution of Assange, which the US government and British courts have largely contrived to exclude from proceedings thus far. His wife Stella Moris told ABC radio last month that the appeal would include evidence of CIA assassination plots, including plans to poison Assange while claiming asylum in the Ecuadorian Embassy in London.

Writing for The Scotsman, legal scholar Dr Paul Arnell of Robert Gordon University in Aberdeen explained that this stage of the case could examine “whether his right to freedom of expression is sufficiently important to bar his extradition, and whether the US request for him was motivated for reasons of his political opinions.”

In a parallel case in Spain Assange’s lawyers are pursuing company UC Global, which provided security at the Ecuadorian Embassy, for spying on Assange and his associates on behalf of US intelligence. Last month, judge Santiago Pedraz sought to summon former CIA director and Secretary of State Mike Pompeo in connection with kidnap and assassination plots against the WikiLeaks founder revealed by Yahoo last September.

The British state’s complicity in this ongoing manhunt was highlighted by Pompeo’s visit to the UK last week. Patel tweeted a photo of them together with the caption, “Delighted to host my friend, former US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo at the Home Office.”


As the world watches, old man Joe looks more and more insane.  Meanwhile, TELESUR reports:


On Monday, Andres Manuel Lopez Obrador reiterated his willingness to discuss Julian Assange's case with U.S. President Joe Biden during his meeting scheduled for next week in Washington.

During his morning daily news briefing, the Mexican President announced that he was willing to provide asylum to Julian Assange; at the time, he criticized that "the big press" has kept silent in the face of the case of the founder of WikiLeaks.

"If he is brought to the U.S. and given the maximum sentence, [sentenced to] death in prison, a campaign should be launched to dismantle the Statue of Liberty in New York that was gifted by the French because it will no longer be a symbol of freedom," explained Lopez Obrador.

"Julian Assange is the best journalist of our time in the world and he has been treated very unfairly, worse than a criminal. This is a shame for the world," said the Mexican President, calling for the accusations to be lifted. He recalled that "humanity must prevail."


So Lopez Obrador is going to try to discuss the issue of Julian with Joe?  I hope he's bringing flash cards and maybe sock puppets.


Turning to Iraq . . . 

Despite holding elections October 10th, Iraq still has no president, still has no prime minister.  And ISIS is getting restless.  Over the weekend, REPUBLIC WORLD reported:


Two people were killed while four others were wounded on Saturday after Daesh militants attacked northern and central Iraq. According to security sources, the first attack took place in Nineveh Governate, which borders Syria, where one soldier was killed and two civilians were wounded after a roadside bomb exploded. The blast, which Iraqi security officials believe was planted by the IS, exploded near an Iranian security unit outside a village on the outskirts of Tal Afar. 

Speaking to Xinhua on condition of anonymity, a source said that the attack took place when the country’s law enforcers were hunting down IS terrorists in the area. Meanwhile, a similar explosion occurred in the Salah al-Din governorate, where at least one civilian was killed and two others were wounded. The roadside bomb was planted by IS terrorists and exploded near the village of Tarmiyah, some 30 kilometers north of the capital Baghdad. 


And when the Iraqi people aren't suffering from ISIS, they're suffering from government failures.  Qassim Abdul-Zahra (AP) reports:


A chlorine gas leak at a water purification plant in southern Iraq injured at least 300 people, officials said Monday.

The incident happened Sunday night when the potentially fatal gas leaked from a container in the plant in the district of Qal'at Sukkar north of the southern city of Nasiriyah.

Hundreds of people suffering severe respiratory distress from exposure to the chlorine were taken to a nearby hospital, said Abbas Jaber, Dhi Qar province's deputy governor.


Ahmed Maher (THE NATIONAL) provides this context:

Dhi Qar province has faced regular anti-government protests over the past three years, as has been the case with several other cities and towns in Iraq's south.

Protesters have sought to topple the entire political establishment in the country amid anger at endemic corruption, high unemployment and poor public services.

The demonstrations have been the bloodiest since the US-led invasion of Iraq in 2003.

An operation by security services killed at least 700 people and wounded thousands in the first six months since the protests began in October 2019, according to independent and international rights groups.

The unrest led to the resignation of the government of Adel Abdul Mahdi, prime minister at the time.

The Dhi Qar chlorine leak comes seven days after a fatal chlorine gas incident at the main Red Sea port of Aqaba in neighbouring Jordan, which killed 13 people and injured more than 250.


And they're also dealing with a cholera outbreak, COVID 19 and Congo Fever as well as climate change and the constant dust storms.  CALIFORNIA 18 reports:


In the streets of Baghdad, Iraq more and more masks are seen, but this trend has nothing to do with the coronavirus pandemic -- not even in the most acute part of the crisis was its use generalized -- but with another enemy: the dust that is in suspension and that does not let breathe. Although sandstorms have always existed here, they are becoming more frequent and unbearable.

This is well known to Milad Mitti, a food delivery person from the capital of the Arab country who is well equipped to deal with the phenomenon. Wearing goggles “for dust” and a scarf that also covers his mouth so he can breathe, he goes out into the street so as not to lose another day of work due to the sandstorms in Iraq.



No government, all this time later.  As the country drifts along without leadership, hot spots keep developing.  Now it's Basra.  RUDAW reports:


Tensions between two tribes in the southern Iraqi province of Basra on Friday led security forces to use drones to stop the fighting, with the quarrels first surfacing three years ago.

Tensions between the tribes of Albu Hamdan and al-Batut sparked clashes that lasted for more than five hours in the town of Garma, as the two tribes fought over concerns of debt.

"We have closed our shops since 4 pm yesterday because of the bullets of the Hamdan and Batut tribes coming at us," witness Uday Shareef told Rudaw's Halkawt Aziz, describing the situation as "hell."

"We live in hell, not in a country or Iraq," Shareef said.


Chenar Chalak (RUDAW) reports a new development:


The Coordination Framework on Monday called on Kurdish parties to agree on a single candidate for the post of Iraq’s presidency, stressing the importance of stabilizing the political process and forming a “harmonious” government.

The Coordination Framework, pro-Iran Shiite parliamentary faction, discussed the latest developments in Iraq’s political scene during its regular meeting, which was attended by the head of the political parties within the faction.

“Leaders of the [Coordination] Framework called on the Kurdish forces to unify their efforts and work on settling a candidate for the presidency of the [Iraqi] republic,” read a statement from the Shiite faction following the meeting.

According to a long-standing customary agreement, the presidency lies with the Kurds and the position has been held by the Patriotic Union of Kurdistan (PUK) since 2005. 

Up to last month, the Kurdistan Democratic Party (KDP) held a strong position in challenging the PUK for the position, but a sudden withdrawal by the parliament’s largest Shiite bloc led by cleric Muqtada al-Sadr on June 12, rendered the KDP’s claim to the presidency difficult without the backing of their strong Shiite ally.

                                                                             

To be clear, the Kurds are not the reason that Iraq hasn't been able to form a government.  But if the Framework is calling on them to decide on one candidate, that indicates that the Framework doesn't need to buy anymore time, that they have decided who will be prime minister and they are prepared to move forward.


Who could it be?


Mohammed Salih Tweeted yesterday:


If Maliki, the man under whose nose ISIL occuppied large swaths of the country and the man during whose reign nearly $1 trillion went missing, becomes the PM again, you can count on Iraq entering a darker era.


Over at ANTIWAR.COM, Jason Ditz writes:


All but inevitable since the resignation of Moqtada al-Sadr’s coalition from parliament, the State of Law has announced its own candidate for Iraqi PM. As expected, it is Nouri al-Maliki.

Holding the position from 2006 to 2014, Maliki is the longest-seated premier of the US occupation of Iraq. A former Dawa Party figure popular with Iran, Maliki was a controversial leader throughout his last tenure.

Navigating through constant political division, Maliki was positioned as a compromise candidate protecting a status quo which, by 2014, fewer and fewer voters were looking to defend anymore.


It's a tough post for Jason Ditzy.  He's all up in Moqtada and needs to believe that Moqtada a saint -- one who killed US troops, of course -- and that Nouri -- and only Nouri -- is corrupt.  


Nouri's corrupt.  Nouri's a thug.  Guess what, Ditzy, nobody reading here in the last 12 months is gasping.  Because we've noted these things and we've noted that Nouri was a major player.  While you copied corporate media and spent 12 months ignoring Nouri because that is what the US State Dept wanted to happen, we were honest.  We talked about it ahead of the election and we talked about it after.  And when the roadblocks started coming up for Moqtada we noted who was tossing them out -- Nouri -- and what year he'd used the same antics before.  But you still couldn't type Nouri back then.  


Is Nouri about to become prime minister again.  It appears possible.  And maybe Ditzy and everybody else needs to go back and explain why their coverage was so wrong and failed to factor Nouri in, ignoring him month after month.


New content at THIRD: