Michael Tracey Retweeted
Study: "Clinton’s message was devoid of policy discussions in a way not seen in the previous four" elections http://mediaproject.wesleyan.edu/blog/2016-election-study-published/ …
Her campaign was empty of everything.
"Like me!!!"
"Vote for me!!!"
She was so devoid of any ethics that I guess she failed to note she had nothing to run on.
Ava and C.I. nailed it "So, uh, we weren't with her? (Ava and C.I.):"
Contrast her "For anyone who's ever been counted out . . ." of 2008 with "I'm With Her" of this go round.
Were we trying to get into a club?
I'm with her?
In 2008, she was going to do something to help we the people, she was going to be a fighter for we the people.
Eight years later, I'm with her?
She ran her campaign as though the country owed her the presidency and all she had to do was show up for the coronation.
Exactly, they wrote that the day after the election.
Exactly.
Hillary was the hollow candidate, the empty suit.
And then she wanted to whine -- and so did her followers.
She really needs to go away.
Here's C.I.'s "Iraq snapshot:"
Wednesday, March 8, 2017. Chaos and violence continue, the State Dept finally holds a press briefing, and more.
US President Donald Trump, this week, signed a new executive order regarding immigration.
We'll note this from the State Dept press briefing.
QUESTION: All right, last thing. On the executive order that was signed yesterday but which we all had a preview of, the immigration and refugee executive order.
MR TONER: Yep.
QUESTION: Since you knew that this was coming, and everyone basically knew it was coming since the first one came out, it calls for a review of the vetting procedures for not just refugees, but also on the terms of visa issuance. I’m wondering, since that review must be well along now, what deficiencies the reviewers have uncovered in the previous, or prior, or even current vetting processes.
MR TONER: Sure. Well, I mean, look – and this is elaborated in section five of the executive order – but it does call for the development of a uniform baseline for screening and vetting standards and procedures. And it also, as you noted, calls for progress reporting to the President beginning 60 days after the implementation date, which is March 16th. That said, some of this work was already underway from the previous EO.
I can’t get into too many specific details about what this report has uncovered thus far. We spoke with – and frankly, Secretary Tillerson spoke in respect to some of the progress that Iraq has made with regard to meeting some of the questions or some of the disconnects, if you will, in terms of information sharing and other procedures, that they’ve met those requirements – one of the reasons why Iraq was removed from the list of seven countries.
But this is all part of the executive order’s purpose, which is to review and improve our national security-focused visitor screening and vetting procedures. And the process, as I said, is ongoing.
QUESTION: So there hasn’t been any specific improvement so far --
MR TONER: Well, again, I mean, we’re always seeking to improve what we’re doing. And this is an iterative process. I mean, even before the executive order, we can say that it’s not like we just began this January 27th. But I think it was a renewed commitment to look at the procedures with how we vet both refugees incoming as well as immigrants – or rather, traveling public – into this country to ensure that we’re doing the necessary to provide for the security of Americans.
QUESTION: That suggests that the necessary wasn’t being done prior. Is that correct?
MR TONER: Not at all. And I think the Secretary spoke to this yesterday, when he said that this is – it’s almost impossible – and I’m paraphrasing him – for this to be infallible, this process. But we always have to strive to do so. And I think past administrations have done so as well. But I think the President clearly identified this as a security issue when he came into office, and now we’ve reissued the executive order yesterday – or issued a new executive order yesterday. But I can assure you that this is an ongoing process.
That was Tuesday's US State Dept press briefing, moderated by spokesperson Mark C. Toner.
Also the first State Dept press briefing of the new administration.
March 7th.
The day of the first press briefing.
And currently it's being classified as "press briefing" -- not daily press briefing.
Let's appeal to vanity and self-interest.
Trouble getting your message across?
Press briefings can help there.
It also means you're injecting another voice into the news cycle.
In addition, you're reaching Americans who view it on CSPAN, who view it online.
You are getting your message out.
It's to the administration's benefit to hold these.
Is it to the American people's benefit?
Yes, transparency is always a good thing.
It's a good thing in other ways.
It lets the American people, for example, see how hollow the press corp is.
Iraq is not part of the new executive order.
So Iraq was not of interest to the press.
They didn't ask one question.
The US has spent billions on Iraq since August 2014.
But heaven forbid the press provide oversight of where and how tax dollars are being spent.
They forget their job so often, so repeatedly.
If Donald Trump wants to get across the message that the press is not a friend of the people, daily press briefings where Iraq is ignored can underscore that perfectly.
Elise Labott was at yesterday's press briefing -- self-congratulating as always.
Was it surprising that she didn't bring up Iraq?
Day 142 of The Mosul Slog.
And what's Elise's 'big' contribution to the Mosul story?
Back in an October State Dept press briefing, Elise Labott screamed "NO!" in the middle of a press conference when a reporter referred to the Mosul operation as a slog.
Of course, it was a slog then.
It's a slog now.
So Elise plays dumb.
Well, she stays silent.
You can't play dumb if you are dumb, so let's just say she stays silent.
So many do.
Then there are those who don't but should.
US President Donald Trump, this week, signed a new executive order regarding immigration.
We'll note this from the State Dept press briefing.
QUESTION: All right, last thing. On the executive order that was signed yesterday but which we all had a preview of, the immigration and refugee executive order.
MR TONER: Yep.
QUESTION: Since you knew that this was coming, and everyone basically knew it was coming since the first one came out, it calls for a review of the vetting procedures for not just refugees, but also on the terms of visa issuance. I’m wondering, since that review must be well along now, what deficiencies the reviewers have uncovered in the previous, or prior, or even current vetting processes.
MR TONER: Sure. Well, I mean, look – and this is elaborated in section five of the executive order – but it does call for the development of a uniform baseline for screening and vetting standards and procedures. And it also, as you noted, calls for progress reporting to the President beginning 60 days after the implementation date, which is March 16th. That said, some of this work was already underway from the previous EO.
I can’t get into too many specific details about what this report has uncovered thus far. We spoke with – and frankly, Secretary Tillerson spoke in respect to some of the progress that Iraq has made with regard to meeting some of the questions or some of the disconnects, if you will, in terms of information sharing and other procedures, that they’ve met those requirements – one of the reasons why Iraq was removed from the list of seven countries.
But this is all part of the executive order’s purpose, which is to review and improve our national security-focused visitor screening and vetting procedures. And the process, as I said, is ongoing.
QUESTION: So there hasn’t been any specific improvement so far --
MR TONER: Well, again, I mean, we’re always seeking to improve what we’re doing. And this is an iterative process. I mean, even before the executive order, we can say that it’s not like we just began this January 27th. But I think it was a renewed commitment to look at the procedures with how we vet both refugees incoming as well as immigrants – or rather, traveling public – into this country to ensure that we’re doing the necessary to provide for the security of Americans.
QUESTION: That suggests that the necessary wasn’t being done prior. Is that correct?
MR TONER: Not at all. And I think the Secretary spoke to this yesterday, when he said that this is – it’s almost impossible – and I’m paraphrasing him – for this to be infallible, this process. But we always have to strive to do so. And I think past administrations have done so as well. But I think the President clearly identified this as a security issue when he came into office, and now we’ve reissued the executive order yesterday – or issued a new executive order yesterday. But I can assure you that this is an ongoing process.
That was Tuesday's US State Dept press briefing, moderated by spokesperson Mark C. Toner.
Also the first State Dept press briefing of the new administration.
March 7th.
The day of the first press briefing.
And currently it's being classified as "press briefing" -- not daily press briefing.
Let's appeal to vanity and self-interest.
Trouble getting your message across?
Press briefings can help there.
It also means you're injecting another voice into the news cycle.
In addition, you're reaching Americans who view it on CSPAN, who view it online.
You are getting your message out.
It's to the administration's benefit to hold these.
Is it to the American people's benefit?
Yes, transparency is always a good thing.
It's a good thing in other ways.
It lets the American people, for example, see how hollow the press corp is.
Iraq is not part of the new executive order.
So Iraq was not of interest to the press.
They didn't ask one question.
The US has spent billions on Iraq since August 2014.
But heaven forbid the press provide oversight of where and how tax dollars are being spent.
They forget their job so often, so repeatedly.
If Donald Trump wants to get across the message that the press is not a friend of the people, daily press briefings where Iraq is ignored can underscore that perfectly.
Elise Labott was at yesterday's press briefing -- self-congratulating as always.
Was it surprising that she didn't bring up Iraq?
Day 142 of The Mosul Slog.
And what's Elise's 'big' contribution to the Mosul story?
Back in an October State Dept press briefing, Elise Labott screamed "NO!" in the middle of a press conference when a reporter referred to the Mosul operation as a slog.
Of course, it was a slog then.
It's a slog now.
So Elise plays dumb.
Well, she stays silent.
You can't play dumb if you are dumb, so let's just say she stays silent.
So many do.
Then there are those who don't but should.
U.S. & Iraqi sources believe ISIL leader Baghdadi left Mosul fight to field commanders; is hiding in rural villages
Did he leave Mosul?
Or did his ghost?
"US & Iraqi sources" have repeatedly told the press that he's been killed multiple times.
That's the problem with doing stenography of whispers.
Iraq hasn't been covered by the western media in some time.
Elections are around the corner in Iraq.
How many western outlets have covered the political landscape?
Ammar Alsawad (AL-MONITOR) offers a look at the landscape:
On Feb. 28, hundreds of pro-Sadrist university students in Kut attacked Iraqi Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi's procession with stones and water bottles. Abadi's security forces fired tear gas and live bullets at the protesters, injuring three. Subsequently, Sadrist leader Muqtada al-Sadr apologized to Abadi for the breaches. Though he called on his followers to stop the protests in Kut until further notice, he accused former Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki of being behind the breaches to try to distort the Sadrist movement's image.
On Feb. 20, Sadr announced a 29-point initiative: Initial Solutions — his vision for the future of Iraq once the Islamic State (IS) is forced out. Holding local primary elections was among the points. Sadr’s keenness on holding elections is likely to further deepen the Shiite split as the leaders fight for a majority position.
About a month ago, the Sadrist movement started calling for electoral reforms, seeking to reduce Maliki’s strong chances of winning the election as long as no radical changes are made to the electoral law and commission.
On #internationalwomensday
we are happy that more than 550 women delivered safely in @MSF maternity clinic in Tal Maraq since Oct #IWD2017
we are happy that more than 550 women delivered safely in @MSF maternity clinic in Tal Maraq since Oct #IWD2017
Celebrate women today.
Let's note the great Chaka Khan -- not once but three times.
Here she is performing "Tight Fit" on Joan Rivers' late night FOX talk show (the same episode where Chaka offered romantic advice to a not present Donna Mills).
And here's the studio version.
Lastly, Chaka doing "My Funny Valentine."
We'll again note NOW is striking today:
NOW is Going on Strike
Statement by NOW President Terry O'Neill
03.06.2017
Women do work of enormous economic value–for unequal or insufficient compensation, and while routinely grappling with gender-based discrimination. A Day Without a Woman and the International Women’s Strike will demonstrate this enormous economic power–and we will use our financial strength to demand more for women workers everywhere.
NOW will be closing our offices on this powerful day of action, and encouraging our staff to take to the streets in support of women’s economic equality. We hope that you will get out and take action in your community, too.
Here’s where I’ll be:
- Resist Trump: Stop the Gag, Freedom Plaza, 11 a.m.: Marching to the White House with the Feminist Majority in fierce opposition to Donald Trump’s dangerous global gag rule–which restricts abortion access and endangers women’s lives worldwide.
- Women Workers Rising Rally, Department of Labor, 3:30p p.m.: Standing with Restaurant Opportunities Centers (ROC) United and One Billion Rising to demand that the Department of Labor affirm fair treatment of women workers.
- Take the day off from paid and unpaid labor
- Shop only at small, women-, and minority-owned business
- Wear RED in solidarity with A Day Without a Woman
Contact
M.E. Ficarra , press@now.org , 951-547-1241, ,
###
The following community sites -- plus BLACK AGENDA REPORT -- updated:
Robert Osborne
12 hours ago
Another victory for WikiLeaks
12 hours ago
You The Powerful?
12 hours ago
Who is the real cyber threat?
12 hours ago
Wikileaks
12 hours ago
The Phoenix Program, The C.I.A.
13 hours ago
The Good Times Are Coming
13 hours ago
