Wednesday, May 10, 2017

Who trusts the institutions these days?

Part of the reason why liberals are constantly so panicked is that they had faith in US institutions to begin with.


Amen.

When you ain't got nothing, you got nothing to lose.

Had to call my dad.

Bob Dylan, "Like a Rolling Stone."

I knew it was from a song.

Dad's Mr. Classic Rock.

:D

But truly, after the Iraq War -- which is still going on -- how could anyone have faith in any institution?

Who saved us?

Not a damn person.

You can lie and pin the start of the war on the Republican Party -- as so many do.

But the reality is that many Dems supported it as well.

But if you want, pin it on the GOP.

SO then we vote the Dems into power -- in both houses! -- in the 2006 mid-terms.

And they fail us.

So both major parties failed us.

The courts failed us.

Our 'leaders' on the left failed us.

(Hey, Jane Fonda, when you going to remember Iraq?  I was there when you gave that speech in DC in January 2007.  You haven't done a damn thing.  Stop pretending you're an activist.  You don't even talk about Iraq.)

And of course the press failed us.

So how can you trust any institution these days?

Think about that as you read the snapshot because C.I.'s opening is strong and relates to this.


Here's C.I.'s "Iraq snapshot:"


Wednesday, May 10, 2017.  Chaos and violence continue, The Mosul Slog continues, Turkey continues bombing northern Iraq, and much more.




What lies do they teach in high school to instill pride in US institutions these days?



Many high school students—soon to register for the draft—have never known a U.S. not at war in Afghanistan and Iraq.



How do you sell that?

Endless wars.

Iraq didn't attack the US, neither did Afghanistan.

But one war is 14 years old and the other is 16 years.

Can't sell them as 'success.'

Successful wars don't last over a decade.

Can't sell them as defense -- again, neither country attacked the US.

Over a million Iraqis killed before this decade even started.

Maybe you could try 'humanitarian' but you'd probably have to quickly add "gone deadly wrong."

How do you sell these wars?

Day 203 of The Mosul Slog.



Incredible progress in 🇮🇶 's forces launched a very successful offensive and recaptured most of the city's northwest this week.
 




ALJAZEERA notes:

More than 400,000 people have been displaced from western Mosul about two months into the Iraqi army's battle against the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL), according to the UN.


The UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA) said, citing the Iraqi government, that 434,775 people have fled ISIL's last stronghold in Iraq since Iraqi forces launched the western Mosul operation on February 19.
This brings the number of internally displaced people, since the Mosul operation started in October, to a total of 615,150 Iraqis.


If creating refugees is a measure of success, count The Mosul Slog as a huge accomplishment.


What happens after?

Because at some point, the Islamic State has to be driven out of Mosul (even if only temporarily).


Paul Iddon (RUDAW) explores that possibility:

When asked if Baghdad will be able to secure, stabilize and rebuild Mosul long-term after ISIS's removal [Washington Institute's Michael] Knights responded in the affirmative, but added that “the long-term is a long way away.”

Dylan O'Driscoll, a former analyst the Middle East Research Institute (MERI) think-tank in Erbil who now works at the Humanitarian and Conflict Response Institute (HCRI) at the University of Manchester, warned of ill-planning before the Mosul operation began. Political timetables in both Baghdad and Washington saw both powers overlook the importance of anticipating how to deal with the long-term situation in Mosul, as opposed to just the immediate military task of removing the militants.

Before the beginning of the operation last October he wrote a report on Mosul and the future of the wider Nineveh region published by MERI which outlined the shortcomings of current plans, or lack thereof, for that area’s future. O'Driscoll compared this to the poor post-conflict planning following the 2003 American-led invasion of Iraq, and the instability which subsequently plagued the country ever since, and warned that if Mosul's “liberation is devoid of long-term planning it will likely result in the resurfacing of a number of issues responsible for the rise of ISIS in Iraq in the first place.”

“I still share the same concerns I had when my report on the future of Nineveh was published before the military campaign began last year,” O'Driscoll told Rudaw English. “I don't see adequate preparation for the governance of the province post-ISIS and the necessary institutional restructuring is widely being ignored.

“At the same time, there is very little development of coordinated localized security solutions allowing for the long-term security of the province. On the development side, things are also moving slow, particularly with regards to restarting the economy.”





Mosul isn't the only major issue of late.

Iraq's neighbor to the north is Turkey.


Yesterday, Sputnik noted, "According to the Anadolu news agency citing the Turkish General Staff, three caves and four bunkers were destroyed in air raids in Metina, Zap, Avasin-Basyan and Gara in northern Iraq. Three camp areas were also destroyed."  Yes, Turkey's still bombing northern Iraq.  Still maintaining that it's attacking the PKK.  Still pretending no civilians are being killed.

HURRIYET DAILY NEWS maintains, "The Turkish Air Force has been conducting regular airstrikes on PKK facilities in both northern Iraq and inside the country since July 2015."  Actually, no.  This latest round began then but they've been doing this since Nouri al-Maliki's first term as prime minister.

HURRIYET can be forgiven because it's a Turkish paper and tell too much truth and the Turkish president will shut you down.



As DEUTSCHE WELLE noted earlier this year:


"Those who report critically land behind bars," stated Carl-Eugen Eberle. The media law expert heads the German branch of the Vienna-based International Press Institute (IPI), a global network of publishers, journalists and industry insiders. IPI actively supports press freedom and, like similar organizations such as Reporters Without Borders or Writers-in-Prison, it appeals to political leaders, sends letters and travels to problematic countries.
Since the coup attempt in July 2016 and the resulting state of emergency in Turkey, the state of freedom of press in Turkey has drastically worsened, according to IPI. Reporters Without Borders has spoken of "repression on an otherwise unknown scale."

Accused of propagating terror and instigating the public, journalists and authors such as Deniz Yucel - a German citizen - have been arrested. According to IPI, around 150 journalists are currently being held in Turkish prisons. The Turkish journalists' platform P24 has put the number at 140, while the Committee to Protect Journalists says it's "more than 80." The Turkish government, on the other hand, admits to imprisoning only 30 journalists.
The recent arrest in Turkey of German reporter Deniz Yucel is not unique. While Turkey's constitution guarantees press freedom, a slew of other laws are turning it into one of the world's worst places for journalists.


Turkey has long maintained that every strike killed PKK fighters and nothing but PKK fighters; however, many civilians have been killed by bombs dropped from Turkish war planes.  As for the PKK, Aaron Hess (International Socialist Review) described the PKK in 2008, "The PKK emerged in 1984 as a major force in response to Turkey's oppression of its Kurdish population. Since the late 1970s, Turkey has waged a relentless war of attrition that has killed tens of thousands of Kurds and driven millions from their homes. The Kurds are the world's largest stateless population -- whose main population concentration straddles Turkey, Iraq, Iran, and Syria -- and have been the victims of imperialist wars and manipulation since the colonial period. While Turkey has granted limited rights to the Kurds in recent years in order to accommodate the European Union, which it seeks to join, even these are now at risk."



New content at THIRD:




And the following community sites -- plus Jody Watley and BLACK AGENDA REPORT -- updated:



  •  


  •  








  • Tuesday, May 09, 2017

    Macron and Comey

      Retweeted
    Waiting for American liberals to realize that Emmanuel Macron plans to clamp down on unions, cut public sector jobs & reduce business taxes.





    Like the sentiment.

    But, honestly, don't see the Macron crowd wising up.


    James Comey was fired today as head of the FBI.

    He heard about it on TV -- I heard on TV -- because he was in Los Angeles and not at his DC office.


    Anyway, best reaction?


    WikiLeaks would be happy to consider hiring James Comey to help lead its DC office should he like to properly investigate the US government.







    Here's C.I.'s "Iraq snapshot:"


    Tuesday, May 9, 2017.  Chaos and violence continue, it's day 202 of The Mosul Slog, the western press works overtime to distort reality, and much more.






    Birds fly, we turned finally free
    Patience lost, I began to lose me
    My advice would be take a breath
    Close your eyes and take a step
    I wasn't scared, I fought this on my own
    You pulled me down and I let you go
    I told you I would prove you wrong
    And now I'm here and I'm standing strong
    I know (I know, I know)
    I know (I, I know, I know)
    I know (I know, I know)
    That I ain't got far to go, go, go
    'Cause I spent forever waiting
    And it's no longer a dream
    And now I've landed on my feet
    And I ain't got far to go
    -- "Ain't Got Far To Go," written by Jess Glynne, nox Brown, Janee Bennett and Find Dow-Smith, first appears on Jess' I CRY WHEN I LAUGH



    Hopefully, we don't have far to go.

    Hopefully, they're collecting for the gold watch at SLATE and, three years tops, Fred Kaplan will be gone soon.  

    No one's done more to pollute the discussion of Iraq than Kappy.

    In his latest garbage, he's fretting over US Secretary of Defense James Mattis and the plan.  Kappy's a drama queen.

    Mattis’ plan, according to officials who have seen it, is a “whole-of-government effort,” addressing not just the battle in Syria and Iraq but also the need for political stability after ISIS is defeated and a diplomatic settlement, including humanitarian assistance, throughout the entire region.
    The absence of a presidential decision on the plan weighs heavily as the combatants slog through the final—in some ways, most brutal—round of fighting in Mosul. Even before Mattis finished his report, Trump loosened controls on U.S. commanders in the field, letting them decide on their own whether to drop bombs on targets in populated areas. The “rules of engagement” weren’t changed, nor did commanders start ignoring the laws of warfare. But whereas President Obama would often rule on whether to bomb or refrain if there was some chance that an airstrike would kill civilians, Trump has let the officer in the field calculate the probabilities and decide whether they’re too high, or low enough, to order an attack.


    What will Donald do, Kappy wants to know.

    Read in vain for Donald turning control over force numbers on the ground to commanders.

    Seems sort of a commander-in-chief decision, unless you're Crappy Kappy.


    And is anyone ever going to weigh in on that -- anyone outside of this community?

    If only to note that throughout the campaign for president, Donald insisted he was smarter than the generals yet he's now turned over control on force numbers?


    Probably not.

    Just like Kappy thinks he can toss around "whole-of-government."

    If Kappy ever gets that stick out of his ass, maybe he can work on losing tired phrases next?

    "Whole-of-government"?

    If Trump proposes that, this will be the third administration that has.

    It's a cute and meaningless phrase -- but one that feels better on the tongue to War Hawks than their earlier term "holistic approach."

    Nothing has changed in the previous two administrations and Kappy's eager to pimp a plan that will continue the same progressing-to-no where approach because that's Kappy.

    There are so many lies and distortions in his piece that we should all hope he puts in for early retirement.

    Instead of holding the US government accountable -- his job, though he so frequently forgets it -- he tosses out the 'ISIS is responsible for the civilians killed in US bombings' nonsense.

    If and when Kappy retires, we'll still be left with the hideous Erika Solomon -- aka Queen of the Dumb F**ks.



    Washington and its allies are likely to support Iraqi security operations even after Isis is driven out. But that alone will not solve the puzzle of how Nineveh, and perhaps all of Iraq, heals the scars left by the Islamists. If the country cannot foster coexistence, Baghdad’s allies may find it mired in conflict yet again. “Of course this isn’t over . . . it will become sect versus sect, party against party, neighbour versus neighbour,” says one Nineveh council official, who asked not to be named. “The killing is easy, because we have not imposed governance here. There is no order.” Nineveh, Iraq’s second-largest province, is rich in oil and fertile land. But its complex ethnic make-up means conflicts, many of which predate Isis, are hard to resolve and relatively easy to reignite. When, almost a century ago, British officer TE Lawrence made a map exploring colonial partition of the Middle East based on ethnicities, he put two question marks over Nineveh, which seem to linger to this day.


    Perhaps all of Iraq?

    What a deeply stupid woman.

    I cannot believe the lies that are pimped by the press these days -- and I can't believe that I can't believe it.

    The Iraq War was the war the western press wanted and sold.

    And they've done it ever since.

    They lie, they spin and mainly they whore.

    And, honestly, f**k TE Lawrence and the British self-obsession with Lawrence.

    The Islamist scars?

    Try the scars Britain's long imposed.

    And the Islamic State did not arise from thin air.

    It is the result of the sectarian scars which were encouraged by the United Kingdom and the United States in the current go-round.

    Bringing up Lawrence is an effort by anti-Arabists to pimp the lie that 'those people' just can't find peace because of 'what' they are.  

    No, the reason Iraq is in turmoil is because it's been the focus of repeated western wars.

    The current turmoil has everything to do with the installing of exiles.

    In what world does anyone want to be ruled by cowards who fled their country (and then agitated for England and the US to invade the country)?

    And the cowards returned to Iraq with chips on their shoulders and hatred in their hearts.

    A future for the country?

    No, they could only see evening old scores.

    As Edith Ann once rightly observed, to get back is to go back.

    And that's all the exiles can do, settle old scores, not move the country forward.

    And this failure takes place despite promises and legal contracts.

    But Erika Solomon can never tell you about that.

    She's too busy pimping 'those people' to get honest.

    We've spent the last years talking about this issue -- what happens next.

    Erika's suddenly 'interested' because she thinks The Mosul Slog is nearing an end.

    Maybe it is?

    In the meantime, it's day 202.


    Iraqi forces storm the 17th Tamouz (July) neighbourhood in western .

    Joint Operations officially announce the North Industrial district NW completely liberated by Counter Terrorism units


    Again, day 202.


    And the Islamic State isn't just in Mosul.


    Dozens of army soldiery fleeing their positions as attacked them on Haditha-Baiji road via




    In Baghdad?



    Seven anti-corruption activists kidnapped in Baghdad Armed men have kidnapped seven young Iraqi anti-corruption activists in central Baghd…


    The Islamic State isn't the only actor in Iraq.


    That may or may not be their actions.

    More than likely, it's the act of a Shi'ite militia connected to some politician who has a great deal to fear from corruption investigations.


    Former prime minister -- and forever thug -- Nouri al-Maliki, for example, is the poster child of corruption on social media but, remember, the Iraqi people have always taken the corruption more seriously than the government that supposedly represents them.




    The following community sites updated:

















  • iraq