The Nader-Gonzales campaign has news about ballots. Okay, this is "Nader/Gonzalez Campaign Concludes Successful D.C. Ballot drive with over 7,500 Signatures:"
Monday, August 18, 2008 at 12:00:00 AM
ShareThis
News AdvisoryFOR IMMEDIATE RELEASEContact: (Washington) Chris Driscoll, 202-360-3273, chris@votenader.org; (local) Kymone Freeman, 202-413-6160, kymone@votenader.org
NADER/GONZALEZ CAMPAIGN CONCLUDES SUCCESSFUL D.C. BALLOT DRIVE WITH MORE THAN 7,500 SIGNATURES
Supporters of Independent Presidential Candidate Ralph Nader Tuesday, Aug. 18, will hold a news conference and submit petitions to to the District of Columbia Board of Elections, 441 4th Street, NW, Suite 250 North, Washington, D.C., 20001, to place Mr. Nader and running-mate Matt Gonzalez on the November 2008 election ballot.
Washington will be the 31st ballot line for which the Nader/Gonzalez Campaign has filed since the consumer advocate announced his intent to run during a February 24 appearance on NBC's "Meet the Press." D.C. Ballot access law requires submission of the signatures of 3,900 registered voters. The Nader/Gonzalez campaign will submit more than 7,500 signatures.
Gaining a ballot line in Washington is particularly meaningful as Ralph Nader has long championed the cause of statehood for D.C., whose lack of congressional representatives and lack of control over budgets effectively make D.C. a colony, subject to taxation without representation. Mr. Nader further advocates a Marshall Plan for the cities: rebuilding deteriorated infrastructures and creating domestic jobs.
Kymone Freeman, D.C. Nader/Gonzalez 2008 Coordinator, and Nader/Gonzalez supporters, will be available at 4 p.m. Tuesday, Aug. 19, in Judiciary Square Plaza in front of the District of Columbia Board of Elections, 441 4th Street, NW, Suite 250 North, Washington, D.C., 20001, to answer news media questions.
WHO: Washington D.C. Supporters of Nader/Gonzalez 2008 Campaign
WHAT: News Conference and Turn-in of nominating petitions
WHEN: 4 p.m., Tuesday., Aug. 19, 2008
WHERE: Judiciary Square Plaza, in front of the District of Columbia Board of Elections, 441 4th Street, NW, Suite 250 North, Washington, D.C., 20001
About Ralph NaderAttorney, author, and consumer advocate Ralph Nader has been named by Time Magazine one of the "100 Most Influential Americans in the 20th Century." For more than four decades he has exposed problems and organized millions of citizens into more than 100 public interest groups advocating solutions. He led the movement to establish the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Consumer Product Safety Commission, and was instrumental in enacting the Safe Drinking Water Act, the Motor Vehicle Safety Act, the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and countless other pieces of important consumer legislation. Because of Ralph Nader we drive safer cars, eat healthier food, breathe better air, drink cleaner water, and work in safer environments. Nader graduated from Princeton University and received an LL.B from Harvard Law School.
About Matt GonzalezMatt Gonzalez was elected to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors in 2000 representing San Francisco's fifth council district. From 2003 to 2005, he served as Board of Supervisors President. A former public defender, Gonzalez is managing partner of Gonzalez & Leigh, a 7-attorney practice in San Francisco that represents individuals and organizations in mediation, arbitration, and administrative proceedings before state and federal regulatory bodies. Gonzalez graduated from Columbia University and received a JD from Stanford Law School.
About the Nader/Gonzalez CampaignAccording to a CNN-Opinion Research Corp. poll conducted from July 27-29, Ralph Nader is at 6 percent nationally (equivalent to about 10 million eligible voters), higher than his highest major poll numbers during the same time period in 2000 and approaching the 10 percent threshold required for eligibility to participate in "America's Presidential Debate in New Orleans," a Google-sponsored event scheduled for September 18. In the key swing state of Michigan -- whose Democratic voters were partially disenfranchised by the Democratic National Committee -- an EPIC-MRA poll found Nader at 8-10 percent.
For more information on the Nader/Gonzalez campaign, visit: votenader.org.
-End-
ShareThis
So that's DC but wait, we're not done. This is "Nader/Gonzalez Campaign to Submit More Than 27,000 Signatures to Clinch New York Ballot Line:"
Monday, August 18, 2008 at 12:00:00 AM
ShareThis
News AdvisoryFOR IMMEDIATE RELEASEContact: (Washington) Chris Driscoll, 202-360-3273, chris@votenader.org; (Albany, N.Y.) Christina Tobin, 312-320-4101, christina@votenader.org or Josh Starcher, 718-909-6343, josh@votenader.org NADER/GONZALEZ CAMPAIGN TO SUBMIT MORE THAN 27,000 SIGNATURES TO CLINCH NEW YORK BALLOT LINESupporters of Independent Presidential Candidate Ralph Nader Tues., Aug. 19, will submit petitions to the New York State Board of Elections, to place Mr. Nader and running-mate Matt Gonzalez on the November 2008 election ballot.New York will be the 32nd state in which the Nader/Gonzalez Campaign has filed for a ballot line since Mr. Nader announced his intent to run during a February 24 appearance on NBC's "Meet the Press". To qualify to appear on New York's ballot, state law requires submission of the signatures of 15,000 registered voters. The Nader/Gonzalez Campaign will submit more than 27,000 signatures.Howie Hawkins, New York Nader/Gonzalez 2008 Coordinator, and Christina Tobin, National Ballot Access Coordinator, will be joined by several other Nader/Gonzalez supporters in a news conference at 11 a.m. outside on the Steuben Street side of the State Board of Elections building.WHO: New York Supporters of Nader/Gonzalez 2008 CampaignWHAT: News Conference and nominating petitions submissionWHEN: 11 a.m., Tues. Aug. 19, 2008WHERE: NY State Board Of Elections, 40 Steuben Street, Albany, NY 12207-2108About Ralph NaderAttorney, author, and consumer advocate Ralph Nader has been named by Time Magazine one of the "100 Most Influential Americans in the 20th Century." For more than four decades he has exposed problems and organized millions of citizens into more than 100 public interest groups advocating solutions. He led the movement to establish the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Consumer Product Safety Commission, and was instrumental in enacting the Safe Drinking Water Act, the Motor Vehicle Safety Act, the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and countless other pieces of important consumer legislation. Because of Ralph Nader we drive safer cars, eat healthier food, breathe better air, drink cleaner water, and work in safer environments. Nader graduated from Princeton University and received an LL.B from Harvard Law School.About Matt GonzalezMatt Gonzalez was elected to the San Francisco Board of Supervisors in 2000 representing San Francisco's fifth council district. From 2003 to 2005, he served as Board of Supervisors President. A former public defender, Gonzalez is managing partner of Gonzalez & Leigh, a 7-attorney practice in San Francisco that represents individuals and organizations in mediation, arbitration, and administrative proceedings before state and federal regulatory bodies. Gonzalez graduated from Columbia University and received a JD from Stanford Law School.About the Nader/Gonzalez CampaignAccording to a CNN-Opinion Research Corp. poll conducted from July 27-29, Ralph Nader is at 6 percent nationally (equivalent to about 10 million eligible voters), higher than his highest major poll numbers during the same time period in 2000 and approaching the 10 percent threshold required for eligibility to participate in "America's Presidential Debate in New Orleans," a Google-sponsored event scheduled for September 18. In the key swing state of Michigan -- whose Democratic voters were partially disenfranchised by the Democratic National Committee -- an EPIC-MRA poll found Nader at 8-10 percent.For more information on the Nader/Gonzalez campaign, visit: votenader.org.
-End-
ShareThis
No stopping the Nader-Gonzalez campaign! :D And the super rallies are coming up. This is the campaign to get on board with. Okay, let me turn to Third. Along with Dallas, this is who helped on the edition:
The Third Estate Sunday Review's Jim, Dona, Ty, Jess, and Ava,
Rebecca of Sex and Politics and Screeds and Attitude,
Betty of Thomas Friedman Is a Great Man,
C.I. of The Common Ills and The Third Estate Sunday Review,
Kat of Kat's Korner (of The Common Ills),
Cedric of Cedric's Big Mix,
Mike of Mikey Likes It!,
Elaine of Like Maria Said Paz,
Ruth of Ruth's Report,
Wally of The Daily Jot,
and Marcia SICKOFITRDLZ.
Now here's what we came up with:Truest statement of the Week I -- Bonnie Erbe got this.
Truest statement of the Week II -- And John Walsh got this one.
A note to our readers -- Jim breaks down the edition. It really was a tough edition. Before we were let go, Ava was saying she was so tired (and Ava, Jess, Jim, Dona, Ty and C.I. work to the end) that she couldn't even see straight ("I mean it, my vision is blurry").
Editorial: Withdrawal can be done in 100 days -- C.I. almost used this topic but waited and that allowed us to have the easiest editorial we've ever had. This really is a good editorial. Last week demonstrated that all the lies about 16 months just to withdraw were lies. Withdrawal from Iraq -- full withdrawal -- can take place in 100 days.
TV: Transformations -- I love Ava and C.I.'s writing. They're down on this. They haven't read it and, as usual, don't plan to. But they were wanting to just write about Eli Stone but then Norman Solomon acted like an idiot. They had to bring that in and then there were other things. So they didn't even get to really talk about Eli Stone the way they wanted. I haven't seen it but my oldest brother has been watching it on Saturdays and he really likes it. What I really like is this TV commentary.
Jeremy Hinzman ordered to leave Canada -- Everybody wants to know, "What's on that photo?" They were doing some ink stuff for the newsletters and that got on the scanner. How tired were they? They didn't even notice it. I called Dona today and she asked me what I was talking about. She pulls it up and says, "Oh, that's from the ink drawings we scanned."
Open Up The Debates! -- Three articles become one and really work out that way. I was in the group working on the John Edwards stuff. And Marcia and Ty really wanted that one. It was rough because it just wasn't working. Marcia really did keep everyone focused. At the end, it couldn't make a stand alone article but the strongest part could be combined with other stuff.
What If Feminists Were Swing Voters? -- This is the article that Ava and C.I. proposed the week before but we knew it would be a long piece and we didn't have time. So we picked it up this week. In fact, this is the first piece we wrote to get it out of the way. This is a really strong edition and though it was murder to write, it shows how hard we worked Saturday and Sunday.
The race card, what's not feminism, and more -- Betty proposed this one. We thought it would be shorter and quicker but there was a lot to cover. You have to read this one.
Catching on to the Peace Resister -- This was "short feature." And Dona and Jim want stuff this size next week so we don't end up working and working and working some more.
Roundtable -- Every week when Ava and C.I. go off to do their TV commentary, we either edit or (more likely) just shoot the breeze. They come back and we've got nothing to show for when they were gone. So this time we decided to shoot the breeze via a roundtable. That's why Ava and C.I. aren't participating, they were writing their TV piece. Dallas talks in this and you'll learn how stupid Barack's ad buy was (on the Olympics).
Highlights -- Kat, Marcia, Ruth, Rebecca, Betty, Wally, Cedric, Elaine and I wrote this and picked out all the highlights unless it says otherwise.
How long was the edition? Wally and Cedric thought they'd do their joint-post for Saturday Saturday night. Kat thought she'd be able to grab some editing time on her CD review. Kat never got that time and Wally and Cedric had to wait until late Sunday to do their joint-post. It was probably the longest one (writing edition) we've had in some time and that has to do with the fact that we started earlier than usual. The reason was so that we'd be done long before the sun came up and that didn't happen.
"Where it stands" -- which is why Dona and Jim wrote this note to advise everyone stuff would be going up at some point. It was nine o'clock here (EST) and everyone was exhausted.
Ma's "Split Pea Soup in the Kitchen" went up this weekend. I'm not supposed to read it because it's about me. I kept my word until this evening. I know why she didn't want me to read it. She was afraid I'd see it as, "Don't move, Mike!" I didn't see it that way. I knew she was being the practical one and I knew it was hard on Dad that I'm moving. It's hard on me too but, like my mother says, it really is time.
Here's C.I.'s "Iraq snapshot:"
Monday, August 18, 2008. Chaos and violence continue, Jeffry House still doesn't grasp what Justice Robert Barnes wrote in his ruling, Blackwater mercenaries are made to sweat, Ralph Nader fights for democracy and open debates and Cynthia McKinney makes it clear that she will not be intimidated by some 'supporters' who wanted her to cancel an appearance.
Starting with war resistance. Last Wednesday, US war resister Jeremy Hinzman was informed he had to leave Canada by September 32rd. He and his family (wife Nga Nguyen, son Liam and daughter Meghan) have taped a video at the War Resisters Support Campaign where Jeremy speaks to Stephen Harper, Prime Minister of Canada:
Jeremy Hinzman: Hello, Mr. Harper. This is my family Nga, Liam and Meghan. We've been in Canada for the last four and a 1/2 years. I was a specialist in the 82nd Air borne division of the United States Army and served honorably in Afghanistan. In 2004, my family and I came to Canada because we would not participate in the Iraqi War, a war which Canada also refused to participate in because it was condemned by the international community. One of your predecessors, Pierre Trudeau, once said that Canada should be have from militarism and we took him at this word. On June 3, 2008, the Canadian Parliament passed a motion saying that United States war resisters should be able to remain in Canada. We're asking you to abide by this motion and allow us to stay in Canada. Thank you.
Title Card: On September 23rd, the Harper government plans to deport the Hinzman family back to the United States.
Title Card: Hinzman faces a court martial and up to 5 years in military prison for opposing the Iraq war and coming to Canada.
Title Card: War Resisters Support Campaign (Canada): www.resisters.ca
In These Times has an article by Peter Kavanagh and I'm going to take huge exception with a viewpoint offered by Jeffry House who really needs to start getting to know the facts. Facts are your friend, Jeffry. House represents Joshua Key (and many others) and maybe he thinks making ridiculous statements about the Barnes decision is to Josh's benefit? I don't know. But he was wrong when the decision was released and he's STILL wrong. He tells Kavanagh, "The Key decision is of use to soldiers who have their boots on the ground and are ordered to commit acts [that] violate their consciences, and also violate international norms." House is wrong. Alyssa makes similar statements and I let it slide. I cringe but let it slide. She didn't live through the time period, House did. Judge Barnes, PAY ATTENTION, found the Board to be in error by proclaiming "that refugee protection for military deserters and evaders is only available where the conduct objected to amounts to a war crime, a crime against peace or a crime against humanity."
Let me explain what NOT noting that is akin to: Finding out that your dream house has a closet painted the wrong color and saying, "Oh, forget it." That sentence -- which escapes Allyson, shouldn't escape House. Key words: MILITARY DESERTERS AND EVADERS. Same words from Vietnam. Barnes is using those terms today. Who's what? Deserters are those who served in Iraq and then checked out. Evaders would be those ordered to go to Iraq who checked out before deploying. Barnes knows his terminology and he knows his history. His decision is a very carefully constructed finding. By mentioning the category of military evaders he means who? Jeremy Hinzman, Brandon Hughey and all others who checked out instead of deploying to Iraq. Kyle Snyder, Joshua Key, Patrick Hart, etc would qualify as military deserters in the eyes of the court.
This isn't the first time Jeffry House has made public statements that have missed the boat (and, worse, damaged the cases of others). I'm not going to sit here and smile and pretend it didn't just happen again. He is WRONG. Justice Robert Barnes' decision is a long one. House was commenting on it without even reading it earlier. It was obvious from the press that he hadn't even bothered to read it. He may have read a summary but he didn't read the 23 pages. Barnes is careful, considered and meticulous in his ruling. He is specifically addressing Joshua Key's case but what he ruled provides openings for many war resisters -- regardless of whether they fall into the category of "military deserter" or "military evader." The latter term, during Vietnam, was used to described those who were evading the draft. The "evader" has always been the one who has not been on the battlefield. Barnes is using that term today and Jeffry House should have caught that and should have understood its significance. It's been over a month since that ruling was issued. There's no longer an excuse for not being familiar with it. We'll try to note Kavanagh's article again later in the week -- really note it -- but this is exactly the nonsense (House's -- I'm not referring to Kavanagh) that keeps hurting war resistance. It is exactly why Mactavish was able to dismiss concerns as "speculation." (And, hello, we pointed the dangers of that 'strategy' out here at the start of July. Long before Mactavish offered that ruling. And noted it would be dismissed as "speculation." As it was.) I'm sure House and others are overworked but there are too many basic points of law that are repeatedly being missed. The ruling is 23 pages long. All representing war resisters in Canada need to read over the ruling (read it again if they already have). Don't take House's summary as gospel because this is the second time he's spoken of it publicly and been wrong. Not only do you need to read it for what it says (such as "military deserters and evaders"), you need to read it while thinking how it directly effects your client's case and how YOU CAN TRY TO EXPAND IT to do so. That is building on the ruling. And, one more thing, Barnes mentions Jeremy Hinzman in his ruling. He didn't have to. The fact that Hinzman is mentioned in the ruling makes the ruling especially significant to Jeremy's case. More so than any other war resister except Josh. Equally true, Barnes' statement that, "Officially condoned military misconduct falling well short of a war crime may a support a claim to refugee protection" is a statement that applies to all, not just those who had their boots on the ground. If only those whose boots were on the ground could make that assessment, Barnes couldn't make it himself. He's dependent upon testimony and findings (including the International Red Cross). The same testimony and findings he depended upon to make his ruling may have had impact on the decision of a US war resister currently in Canada who did not go to Iraq.
Irwin Loy (24 Hours Vancouver) reported over the weekend on Michael Beyers who is running for the Canadian Parliament and declared, "I believe in a Canada that grants asylum to principled young Americans that said no to an illegal war." Byers is an NDP candidate and the NDP has a long history of supporting war resisters. Just as Oliva Chow is among those leading the charge today, NDP-ers like Ed Broadbent led it during Vietnam. Back then, Broadbent was regularly pointing out Canada's long history as a place for sanctuary such as when he noted, "Our tradition of welcoming those who are essentially political refugees goes back to the United Empire Loyalists." Broadbent would go on to take the NDP to new heights in the immediate post-Vietnam period. There is no political fallout for Canadian office holders on this issue. [Click here for CBC coverage of Broadbent.] This is the press release issued by Oliva Chow's office on the decision to deport Jeremy:
The August 13 decision by Harper's Conservative government to deport war resister Jeremy Hinzman is mean-spirited and anti-democratic.
"Harper's mean-spirited decision to allow this deportation is sad," said NDP Citizenship and Immigration Critic MP Olivia Chow. "Jeremy has called Canada his home for the past five years and has just recently celebrated the birth of his second child. If there was ever a case to grant refugee status on compassionate and humanitarian grounds, this is it."
With today's negative ruling on Jeremy Hinzman's Pre-removal Risk Assessment and Humanitarian and Compassionate consideration, there is an urgent need for the people of Canada to express their outrage against the Conservative government's refusal to act on the will of Parliament.
On June 3rd, Olivia Chow saw her motion to halt all deporations against US Iraq war resisters passed by Parliament by a vote of 137-110.
"Ordinary Canadians have already said 'yes' to Jeremy Hinzman and to his family," said Chow. "They have spoken through their Parliament, they want to let Mr. Hinzman and other U.S. Iraq War Resisters stay in Canada."
Jeremy Hinzman is schedule to be deported on Tuesday, September 23. Hinzman is the first war resister who filed a refugee claim to stay in Canada.
Courage to Resist alerts, "Supporters are calling on Hon. Diane Finley, Minister of Citizenship and Immigration, to intervene. Phone 613.996.4974 or email finley.d@parl.gc.ca,"Iraq Veterans Against the War also encourages people to take action, "To support Jeremy, call or email Hon. Diane Finley, Minister of Citizenship and Immigration, and ask her to intervene in this case. Phone: 613.996.4974 email: finley.d@parl.gc.ca." In addition to that, Canada's War Resisters Support Campaign is staging an emergency meeting this week (August 20th, Wednesday, 7:00 pm, Steelworkers Hall at 25 Cecil St.) and planning a day of action (September 13th) where "[a]ctions, demonstrations and pickets will take place in cities and towns all across Canada."
There is a growing movement of resistance within the US military which includes Yovany Rivero, William Shearer, Michael Thurman, Andrei Hurancyk, Megan Bean, Chris Bean, Matthis Chiroux, Richard Droste, Michael Barnes, Matt Mishler, Josh Randall, Robby Keller, Justiniano Rodrigues, Chuck Wiley, James Stepp, Rodney Watson, Michael Espinal, Matthew Lowell, Derek Hess, Diedra Cobb, Brad McCall, Justin Cliburn, Timothy Richard, Robert Weiss, Phil McDowell, Steve Yoczik, Ross Spears, Peter Brown, Bethany "Skylar" James, Zamesha Dominique, Chrisopther Scott Magaoay, Jared Hood, James Burmeister, Jose Vasquez, Eli Israel, Joshua Key, Ehren Watada, Terri Johnson, Clara Gomez, Luke Kamunen, Leif Kamunen, Leo Kamunen, Camilo Mejia, Kimberly Rivera, Dean Walcott, Linjamin Mull, Agustin Aguayo, Justin Colby, Marc Train, Abdullah Webster, Robert Zabala, Darrell Anderson, Kyle Snyder, Corey Glass, Jeremy Hinzman, Kevin Lee, Mark Wilkerson, Patrick Hart, Ricky Clousing, Ivan Brobeck, Aidan Delgado, Pablo Paredes, Carl Webb, Stephen Funk, Blake LeMoine, Clifton Hicks, David Sanders, Dan Felushko, Brandon Hughey, Logan Laituri, Jason Marek, Clifford Cornell, Joshua Despain, Joshua Casteel, Katherine Jashinski, Dale Bartell, Chris Teske, Matt Lowell, Jimmy Massey, Chris Capps, Tim Richard, Hart Viges, Michael Blake, Christopher Mogwai, Christian Kjar, Kyle Huwer, Wilfredo Torres, Michael Sudbury, Ghanim Khalil, Vincent La Volpa, DeShawn Reed and Kevin Benderman. In total, at least fifty US war resisters in Canada have applied for asylum.
Information on war resistance within the military can be found at The Objector, The G.I. Rights Hotline [(877) 447-4487], Iraq Veterans Against the War and the War Resisters Support Campaign. Courage to Resist offers information on all public war resisters. In addition, VETWOW is an organization that assists those suffering from MST (Military Sexual Trauma).
Turning to Iraq where Shi'ite pilgrims became the focus of attacks last week and it continued over the weekend. AFP reports that from Thursday through Saturday "at least 36" lost their lives (and notes that Thursday's Iskandariyah attack claimed 22 lives with seventy-three injured). Sunday, Stephen Farrell (New York Times) reported on the 6 deaths of pilgrims in a bombing and that, "Three hours after the early-morning blast, shopkeepers, residents and survivors were still pulling charred goods and debris from damaged roadside stores, and sweeping ashes and wreckage into the gutter." [Friday's bombing attack on pilgrims claimed 9 lives.] Yesterday Hussein Kadhim (McCatchy Newspapers) reports a Sunday Baghdad bomber on bicylce that claimed his/her own life as well as 5 other people (thirteen wounded). As the death toll increased, Sudarsan Raghavan (Washington Post) reported that 7 were dead from the "suicide bomber on a bicycle" with thirteen injured. Erica Goode and Ali Hameed (New York Times) report the bombing took place "in front of Baghdad's famous Abu Hanifa mosque," claimed 15 lives (twenty-nine injured) and: "Witnesses said that the bomber, a man, may have been riding a motorcycle that was parked about 65 feet from a traffic light on the street." Ned Parker and Saif Hameed (Los Angeles Times) explain, "There were contradictory accounts of the incident. One police officer said the bomber was disguised as a woman and arrived on foot; another said the attacker was not disguised and arrived on a bike." The US military maintains it was a man and that he walked up to "an SOI control check point near the Abu Hamifa Mosque wearing a personal borne improvised-explosive device and self-detonated." "SOI" is "Sons of Iraq" aka "Awakening" Councils (or Sahwa). AP disagrees on the gender of the bomber (they say it was a woman) but do agree that 6 "bodyguards of Farooq al-Obeidi, deputy leader of the 'awakening council' in Baghdad's Azamiyah district, also died in the blast, which occurred as they were seated on chairs near a checkpoint near the Abu Hanifa mosque".
Sunday Del Quentin Wilber and Karen DeYoung (Washington Post) reported that six mercenaries working for Blackwater who had been in Iraq "working as security contractors for the State Department, assigned to protect U.S. diplomats and other non-military officials in Iraq" that they are targets in a criminal investigation. If it seems familiar you may be remembering the real-time article by Sabrina Tavernise and James Glanz ("Security Firm Faces Criminal Charges in Iraq," New York Times). Dropping back to the September 17th snapshot:
Turning to the issue of violence, Sahar Issa (McClatchy Newspapers) reported Sunday [Sept. 16th] that a Baghdad shooting (by private contractors) killed 9 Iraqi civilians and left fifteen more wounded. Later on Sunday, CNN reported, "In the Baghdad gun battle, which was between security forces and unidentified gunmen, eight people were killed and 14 wounded, most of them civilians, an Interior Ministry official said. Details were sketchy, but the official said witnesses told police that the security forces involved appeared to be Westerners driving sport utility vehicles, which are usually used by Western companies. The clash occurred near Nisoor square, in western Baghdad. CBS and AP report that Abdul-Karim Khalaf, spokesperson for the Interior Ministry, announced "it was pulling the license of an American security firm allegedly involved in the fatal shooting of civilians during an attack on a U.S. State Department motorcade in Baghdad," that "it would prosecute any foreign contractors found to have used excessive force" in the slaughter (eight dead, 13 wounded) and they "have canceled the liscense of Blcakwater and prevented them from working all over Iraqi territory."
The number killed continued to mount. James Bone (Times of London) notes today that 17 Iraqi civilians were slaughtered in that incident and reminds that, "In negotiations on a new bilateral security agreement, the Iraqi government has pressed for all foreign personnel to be subject to Iraqi law." Meanwhile, the US military has good news yesterday! "Attacks down except roadside bombs, rigged houses"! So attacks are down . . . if you eliminate some of the attacks. The opening sentence: "The numbers of houses rigged with explosives and roadside bombs have increased since the beginning of the Iraqi offensive in Diyala, while other attack trends have been decreasing." Guess this wave of Operation Happy Talk should be dubbed "win some, lose some." M-NF also announced 37 women "attended the first day of a four-week course at the Kirkuk Police Academy outside of Kirkuk city" Saturday. Reuters reported the Turkish military says they bombed northern Iraq on Sunday ("no details of casualties"). And that "police fired on demonstrators" Sunday in Arbil killing one.
In news of today's reported violence . . .
Bombings?
Laith Hammoudi (McClatchy Newspapers) reports a Baghdad roadside bombing that left five people wounded, while another Baghdad roadside bombing left three people wounded and a Baghdad IED bombing left nine people wounded. Reuters notes a Ramadi car bombing that claimed the lives of 5 police officers dead (seven wounded) and a Mosul roadside bombing that resulted in three being injured.
Shootings?
Laith Hammoudi (McClatchy Newspapers) reports that Faris Jabir Thair ("a member in Shaheed al Mihrab organization") was shot dead (machine gunned while in his car) in a Baghdad attack that left his wife wounded, while 2 people were shot dead in Basra ("director of an election center and his deputy") with another wounded and "Awakening" Council leader Raheem Thyab al Bayati was shot dead in Kirkuk. On the Basra shooting of election officials, Reuters notes Ma'ath Wahab was the name of the director who was shot dead (the other killed and the one wounded are not named).
Turning to the US presidential race. Last Monday, independent presidential candidate Ralph Nader was in Toronto. Hentry Martinuk (Rabble News) reports today that Ralph attracted a crowd of 200 and: "There are several other issues where Nader differs from Obama and McCain: impeachment of Bush and Cheney; withdrawal from Iraq; restoring civil liberties; repealing anti-union laws; supporting industrial hemp; and cutting the wasteful military budget. According to Nader, Obama and McCain 'never met a weapons system they didn't like'." Third Party Watch notes, "Zogby International reports that more than half of likely voters nationwide -- 55% -- want Libertarian presidential candidate Bob Barr to participate in the presidential debates this fall, while nearly half -- 46% -- also said they think Ralph Nader should be allowed into the debates." Which is a good time to note, from Ralph's Daily Audio, "Join Our Super Rallies for Open Debates:"
Good morning, this is Ralph Nader. As you know, Nader/Gonzalez is being blocked from the presidential debates. The corporate controlled so-called Commission on Presidential Debates will not let any independent candidate in unless they show 15% in a series of polls in September. That's no surprise. What is surprising is the failure of other debates to fill the vacuum. Part of this is due to Senator Obama's reluctance to engage his opponents. On May 4th, Obama told Tim Russert on Meet The Press that he was willing to debate with "any of my opponents about what this country means, what makes it great." But earlier this month, Obama's campaign manager backed off, saying that Obama would debate only Senator McCain and only in the three rigged debates that's sponsored by the two parties and paid for by corporations. Senator Obama's also refused to participate in a number of other debates including the Google debate in New Orleans, the Texas Ft. Hood debate that is being organized by veterans groups and the series of ten townhall meetings proposed by Senator McCain. Senator Obama's refusal to participate is a mistake and is costing him in the polls. Just yesterday, the Gallup tracking polls put McCain and Obama tied at 44% each. If Obama doesn't agree to more debates he could end up at the end of a sentence that starts out "Mondale, Dukakis, Gore and Kerry. With only McCain and Obama on the stage , there will be no debate of key issues and redirections important to the American people . Just go down the partial list. Single-payer Medicare for all healthcare, supported by the majority of the American people, the majority of doctors and nurses, and just recently, unanimously, by the US conference of mayors? Obama says "no," McCain says "no." Reversing US policy in the Middle East? Obama says "no," McCain says "no." Cut the bloated, wasteful, redundant military budget? Obama says "no," McCain says "no." They want a bigger military budget. Empty the prisons of drug possessors and fill 'em up with corporate criminals? Obama says "no," McCain says "no." Nader-Gonzalez says "yes" to each. The only way to change this systemic exclusion is for millions of Americans to become engaged now. If you can, please join with us at our two Super Rallies-- on August 27th in Denver at the University of Denver Magness Arena or September 4th in Minneapolis at Orchestra Hall. And help us raise the banner for all to see: "OPEN THE DEBATES." If you are not able to attend, please go to VoteNader.org and donate now whatever you can up to the legal maximum of $4,600 to help fund our Open The Debates Campaign. Our goal is to raise $50,000 by Wednesday night. Last night, we were close to $14,000 in less than three days, but we have a ways to go. So join with us in Denver and Minneapolis if you can. We're planning to have some prominent activists and musicians with us. Stay tuned for more information on that. And we have some surprise, giant, inflatable visuals that should be a lot of fun, that will travel with us as we move from Denver to Minneapolis and then, hopefully, will bring attention to our Super Rallies from the press. Thank you for your ongoing and considered support to our campaign. Together we are making a difference. Onward to November. I'm Ralph Nader.
Chuck Baldwin, Bob Barr, Cynthia McKinney and Ralph Nader are presidential candidates. There is no need for "presumptive" to be used as a preface. They are presidential candidates. They get very little coverage. The debates need to be opened and click here for Third addressing that yesterday and this was left out in the rush to type (Jim added it this morning -- thank you to community member Lynda), wo we'll include that section in full here:
The campaign is keeping issues on the table. Thursday, Jess spoke with Junue Millan at the newly opened Nader-Gonzalez Denver Headquarters. The headquarters intends to be open not just business hours Monday through Friday, but from 9:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. That's due to the fact that not only are they a campaign headquarters with all that entails, they're also gearing up for the Denver Super Rally August 27th. They are expecting between 5,000 and 7,000 people at the University of Denver's Magness Arena. And they need volunteers. If you're in the Denver area and interested in helping, you can e-mail Junue Millan at junue@votenader.org as well as call the office (303) 832-2509 or walk in. The Denver Super Rally will feature Ralph and running mate Matt Gonzalez as well as many guest speakers such as artist, activist and rocker Jello Biafra. Junue Millan described the mood to Jess as very up and noted that five outlets (including Univision) had sent reporters Thursday to cover the opening of the Denver headquarters. Millan was able to quickly -- without pausing -- tick off the issues that the Nader-Gonzalez campaign were raising and intended to keep on the table. None of that, "Check Saint Barack's website for issues, I am just here to talk about how groovy Barack is and how, when he cries, the heavens rain. I first came to Barack . . . a street junkie who had run away from home and was turning tricks on the side, selling a little blow and scamming this old lady at the homeless shelter, but Saint Barack has changed my life and cured my irritable bowel syndrome. Praise be, St. Barack." Instead, Millan was informed and a total pro which says a great deal the Nader-Gonzalez campaign.
Steven Argue (Dissident Voice) reports that Green Party candidate Cynthia McKinney (and running mate Rosa Clemente) will be participating in Recreate '68 in Denver in spite of the fact that "the Green Party of Colorado has issued false statements to the press and all over the internet claiming that Green Party presidential candidate Cynthia MiKinney will not be participating in the Recreate '68 events." We don't have room in the snapshot for Cynthia's statement in full (it'll go in one of tomorrow's morning entries) but here is the opening (and for space, paragraphs are going to run together):
As the United States activated Navy ships and the Air Force to begin an airlift of non-specified goods into the former Soviet state of Georgia, and military exercises began in the Persian Gulf near Iran, I received communications from certain individuals among the Colorado Greens who were organizing campaign support events there, suggesting that I not participate in an anti-war program being organized by other individuals in Colorado. Perplexed, I began to do my research to understand the nature of the fissure that I seemed to be placing myself in the middle of. The communications to me about not participating in one of the scheduled events became more and more shrill. The events ran through August 26th. When the lineup of speakers, including Rosa and me, was announced for the events in question, I received multiple communications stating in various ways that the sender from the Green Party of Colorado, was on the verge of desperation over the latter.
At this point Cynthia states that some Colorado Greens threatened her with stopping the ballot access efforts in Wyoming if she didn't agree not to appear and she was told, basically, 'We supported Elaine Brown and not you anyway, nah-nah-nah.' She then lists some of the people participating who have stood up regularly for what was needed before concluding:
Rosa and I have not been given any rational, ideological, or strategically-acceptable reason by the Green Party of Colorado to dissociate ourselves from the movement that this country so desperately needs and that these individuals and organizations participating represent, as we all attempt to hold the Democratic Party accountable for its complicity in all of the crimes of the Bush Administration. Therefore Rosa and I will keep our appointments in Denver and we hope that the members of the Green Party of Colorado will attend our sessions and listen to what we have to say. I have faith that by taking principled stands against war and occupation, human rights abuse, the prison-industrial complex, and in support of freedom for political prisoners, the Green Party will emerge stronger.
Finally, from Ralph's Daily Audio, here's today's "The Bloated Defense Budget:"
This is Ralph Nader. Remember reading or hearing the farewell address of President Dwight Eisenhower? 1960, when he warned Americans about what he called "the military industrial complex." Well, just a few words about where we are in the military budget. It's now 1/2 of the entire federal government's operating expenditures. It's way over $700 billion and that's not counting the money for helping our veterans. Both Obama and McCain want to increase the military budget. The Government Accountability Office yearly describes the gigantic Pentagon contracting budget unaduitable. Just imagine, half of what the federal government spends in operating expenditures can't even be audited. For example, people inside the Defense Department think that the F-22 should never have been contract for, built wasn't necessary. The Osprey helicopter -- defective, killed quite a few marines in test flights, shouldn't have been built in their judgment. Hundreds of billions of dollars are in the pipeline for weapons systems that were designed for the Soviet Union-era of hostility. They no longer have any strategic value and many of them are redundant. We've got to cut the waste out of the huge military budget and put that money back into repairing America's public works and cities, towns and rural areas all over the country. If we cut out the expenditures of keeping our soldiers out of Japan and Western Europe -- 60-plus years after WWII -- a portion of that money could give free education to all students in public universities in the United States. Think about it. Think about who stands for a lean defense -- not a wasteful defense; who stands for respecting your tax payer dollar and returning it to you to improve the public facilities, schools and clinics, libraries, drinking water systems, sewage stream and plant upgrades among some of the deferred maintenance that's reducing the facilities that are necessary for a thriving community.
the common ills
the third estate sunday review
like maria said paz
kats korner
sex and politics and screeds and attitude
trinas kitchen
the daily jot
cedrics big mix
mikey likes it
thomas friedman is a great man
ruths reportsickofitradlz
iraq
jeremy hinzmanerica goodethe new york timesali hameedthe washington postsudarsan raghavanthe los angeles timesned parkersaif hameed
mcclatchy newspapers
irwin loy
stephen farrell
sabrina tavernise
karen deyoung
