These days, who knows? France isn't content being a part of the Libyan War, it wants to get colonial on the Ivory Coast. Ann Talbot (WSWS) notes:
In the last 24 hours, France has directly intervened in the fighting in Ivory Coast as it seeks to reassert its control over its former colony.
French helicopters bombarded forces loyal to President Laurent Gbagbo on Tuesday evening. On Wednesday afternoon, ground forces loyal to rival presidential claimant Alassane Ouattara were unleashed in an assault on the presidential residence. Nonetheless, as of late last night, Ouattara’s troops had retreated after a failed assault on the bunkers where Gbagbo is thought to be hiding.
Ivory Coast’s long-standing military standoff between Ouattara’s northern forces and Gbagbo loyalists has flared since the disputed November 28 presidential election. France and the NATO powers recognized Ouattara as the winner of the election.
French representatives negotiated with Gbagbo through Tuesday night and Wednesday morning. The talks finally broke down in the afternoon and pro-Ouattara forces launched what they described as the “final assault” on the presidential residence. Their intention, they said, was to “fetch him out” of his bunker. The intensity of the fighting was shown by reports that windows had been blown out of the embassies in the diplomatic district.
You get the feeling this was planned some time ago? Me too.
And, here at home, this is from the Center for Constitutional Rights:
CCR Condemns Political Nature of Decision
April 4, 2011, New York – Today, in response to news that the Obama administration will try the 9/11 defendants in the military commissions system rather than Article III civilian courts, the Center for Constitutional Rights issued the following statement:
"The Obama administration all but admitted political failure today as it announced it would try the 9/11 defendants before the deeply flawed military commission system rather than in Article III civilian courts as originally planned. The announcement underscores the fact that decisions about whether to try detainees in federal court or by military commission are purely political. The decision is clearly driven not by the nature of the alleged offense, or where and when it was committed, but by the unpopularity of the detainee and the political culture in Washington.
"It also sets a bad precedent, as shown by Egypt’s apparent plans to use military trials for protesters at Tahir Square. In the same breath that the U.S. is calling for the rule of law in the Middle East, it is subverting it at home.
"The decision to abandon criminal prosecution of the 9/11 defendants in favor of a military commission undermines the prosecutorial discretion of the Justice Department and the independence of the judiciary.
"As Attorney General Holder and Secretary Gates explained in a February 2010 letter to Congress, eliminating federal court trials takes away the most effective tool for combating terrorism. As Obama said during his campaign, the existence of Guantánamo threatens our national security, as do the military commissions themselves.
"President Obama should have followed through on his promise to challenge the congressional ban on the transfer of men from Guantánamo to the U.S. for prosecution before caving to political pressure."
CCR has led the legal battle over Guantanamo for the last nine years – sending the first ever habeas attorney to the base and sending the first attorney to meet with an individual transferred from CIA “ghost detention” to Guantanamo. CCR has been responsible for organizing and coordinating hundreds of pro bono lawyers across the country to represent the men at Guantanamo, ensuring that nearly all have the option of legal representation. In addition, CCR has been working to resettle men who remain at Guantánamo because they cannot return to their country of origin for fear of persecution and torture.
The Center for Constitutional Rights is dedicated to advancing and protecting the rights guaranteed by the United States Constitution and the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Founded in 1966 by attorneys who represented civil rights movements in the South, CCR is a non-profit legal and educational organization committed to the creative use of law as a positive force for social change.
Here's C.I.'s "Iraq snapshot:"