I don't think I have one.
When I read the question, my first thought was Drew Barrymore. But she is over 30. Can I still pick her?
I watched ET over and over growing up. And then, when I got older, Firestarter which I loved even more (Drew was the firestarter). And I had four sisters, meaning I saw everything with her in it. And didn't mind because it was Drew.
In fact, the last movie I saw with my kid sister was one I took her to, Music & Lyics which was Hugh Grant and Drew. And we both laughed hard at the movie.
Drew's good in comedies -- The Wedding Singer, Music & Lyrics, Never Been Kissed, 50 First Dates and Fever Pitch. And she's good in dramas and horror and everything -- Scream, Ever After, Grey Gardens, Batman Forever, Poison Ivy, Mad Love, etc.
My two favorite Drew films are the Charlie's Angels movies. I love those and could watch them ove and over. There are only a few films I feel that way about. The first Austin Powers, for example. But I can watch the Charlie's Angels films over and over.
Okay, this is from Justin Raimondo's "Who Was Behind the Anthrax Attacks?" at Antiwar.com:
It’s not like the authorities are lacking in leads. As I have reported previously,
“Just before the anthrax letters became public knowledge but after they’d been mailed, military police headquarters at Quantico, Virginia, received a letter that accused an Arab scientist who once worked at the USAMRID facility, a biowarfare lab at Ft. Detrick, of being a terrorist about to unleash biological warfare against civilian targets in the U.S.
“The author of this anonymous missive claimed to have been one of the scientist’s former co-workers, and appeared to have a detailed knowledge of Assaad’s career and daily routine. When the anthrax letters were opened, the FBI paid a visit to Dr. Ayaad Assaad, a former Ft. Detrick employee, and questioned him extensively.
“The FBI cleared Assaad of any connection to the anthrax letters early on, but then seemed to have let this significant clue grow quite cold, failing to follow up on it until the winter of 2004, when they launched an investigation into the Quantico letter. It seems clear that whoever sent that letter had at least foreknowledge of the anthrax attacks, and discovering the writers’ identity could certainly lead us to the source of the attacks. Yet for years the FBI did nothing: instead, they chased Hatfill around, following him everywhere, blackening his name – and diverting attention away from the only hard evidence that has so far surfaced in this baffling case.”
As far as I know, the results of the Quantico investigation were never announced. The only media outlets to pay attention to this fascinating yet little known aspect of the anthrax mystery are Salon – some years ago – and the Hartford Courant, which ran a series of articles on the anthrax case and the attempted framing of Dr. Assaad.
Whoever tried to frame Dr. Assaad knows a thing or two about the real perpetrators, of that we can be sure. Yet the FBI has never showed the least amount of interest in this aspect of the case. Why not?
The mystery deepens when we learn the Obama administration threatened to veto an intelligence appropriations bill which contained an amendment mandating a reopening of the anthrax investigation by an independent (non-government) body of experts. What is this administration afraid of? Who or what are they protecting?After all these years and as seriously as they supposedly took this case, how can they not know who was behind it? Here's C.I.'s "Iraq snapshot:"