Mikey Likes It!: Hillary wants to destroy Social Security

Tuesday, October 18, 2016

Hillary wants to destroy Social Security

A closed-door speech to Morgan Stanley in 2013, revealed in hacked emails posted by WikiLeaks, could stoke new questions for Hillary Clinton Wednesday night about whether she truly believes in the fiscal sustainability of the promises she is making on the campaign trail.

In the speech, Clinton referred to the 2010 Simpson-Bowles deficit reduction plan as "the right framework," a stance that is seemingly at odds with her 2016 platform. Throughout the year, Clinton has been decidedly to the left of Simpson-Bowles, which called for a series of changes, including raising the Social Security retirement age from 67 to 69, cutting the growth of future benefits and considering a change in the Medicare eligibility age from 65 to 67 if health care costs grow faster than expected.

You can't trust her.

Bill was going to destroy Social Security up until his affair with Monica Lewisnky was exposed and he needed public support.

Are we supposed to count on Hillary having an affair to save Social Security next?

Hillary having an affair?

Come on, she was lucky to have snared Bill.

She knows it too.

It's why he can cheat all he wants and she won't walk out.

She knows there's no one else who would put up with her -- let alone pretend she's attractive.

Hillary in the White House?

Kiss Social Security good-bye.

New content at THIRD:

And Dallas and the following produced it:

The Third Estate Sunday Review's Jim, Dona, Ty, Jess and Ava,
Rebecca of Sex and Politics and Screeds and Attitude,
Betty of Thomas Friedman Is a Great Man,
C.I. of The Common Ills and The Third Estate Sunday Review,
Kat of Kat's Korner (of The Common Ills),
Mike of Mikey Likes It!,
Elaine of Like Maria Said Paz),
Cedric of Cedric's Big Mix,
Ruth of Ruth's Report,
Wally of The Daily Jot,
Trina of Trina's K itchen,
Marcia of SICKOFITRDLZ,
Stan of Oh Boy It Never Ends,
Isaiah of The World Today Just Nuts,
and Ann of Ann's Mega Dub.

Here's C.I.'s "Iraq snapshot:"

Tuesday, October 18, 2016. Chaos and violence continue, no real solutions have been implemented, Amnesty International notes the continued persecution of the Sunnis, and much more.

Today, the US Defense Dept announced:

Strikes in Iraq
Attack, bomber, fighter and remotely piloted aircraft and rocket artillery conducted seven strikes in Iraq, coordinated with and in support of Iraq’s government:

-- Near Qaim, a strike engaged an ISIL tactical unit and destroyed a vehicle.

-- Near Mosul, four strikes engaged three ISIL tactical units and two staging areas; destroyed 10 mortar systems, five artillery systems, four ISIL-held buildings, four fighting positions, four vehicles, two supply caches, two repeater tower generators, a vehicle bomb facility, and a vehicle bomb. Four tactical units and three rocket positions were suppressed.

-- Near Qayyarah, two strikes engaged two ISIL tactical units and a mortar position; destroyed an ISIL-held building, a mortar system, an oil tanker truck and a rocket-propelled grenade. A vehicle was damaged.

Task force officials define a strike as one or more kinetic events that occur in roughly the same geographic location to produce a single, sometimes cumulative, effect. Therefore, officials explained, a single aircraft delivering a single weapon against a lone ISIL vehicle is one strike, but so is multiple aircraft delivering dozens of weapons against buildings, vehicles and weapon systems in a compound, for example, having the cumulative effect of making those targets harder or impossible for ISIL to use. Accordingly, officials said, they do not report the number or type of aircraft employed in a strike, the number of munitions dropped in each strike, or the number of individual munition impact points against a target. Ground-based artillery fired in counterfire or in fire support to maneuver roles is not classified as a strike.

And along with the four strikes above near Mosul, forces are targeting the city where the Islamic State took control in June 2014.

‏@attackerman

“The Iraqi army arrived yesterday and took the town, and today Isis came back and the army ran away.” 

1 reply24 retweets15 likes

While much of the US press offers rah-rah, XINHUA serves up some actual news.

‏@XHNews

More than 100 U.S. troops embedded with Iraqi forces in fighting to retake #Mosul: #Pentagon xhne.ws/deORo

5 replies34 retweets44 likes

Trainers.

Advisers.

Not, US President Barack Obama insisted, boots on the ground.

But that's exactly what they are.

On the south grounds of the White House today, standing beside Italy's Prime Minister Matteo Reni, Barack declared.

The start of Iraqi operations to liberate Mosul is another major step forward. Mosul, as many of you know, is Iraq's second largest city and ISIL has been entrenched there for more than two years -- perhaps 1 million civilians are still living there. And so, in addition to rooting out ISIL, our focus jointly is on the safety and the humanitarian aid for civilians who are escaping the fight. That's going to be a top priority for both our governments. Mosul will be a difficult fight and there will be advances and there will be setbacks. But I am confident that -- just as ISIL has been defeated in communities across Iraq -- ISIL will be defeated in Mosul as well and that will be another step towards their ultimate destruction.

But, of course, ISIS does not get defeated on the battlefield.

Once upon a time, Barack grasped that.

In fact, June 19, 2014, he declared:

Above all, Iraqi leaders must rise above their differences and come together around a political plan for Iraq’s future. Shia, Sunni, Kurds -- all Iraqis -- must have confidence that they can advance their interests and aspirations through the political process rather than through violence. National unity meetings have to go forward to build consensus across Iraq’s different communities. Now that the results of Iraq’s recent election has been certified, a new parliament should convene as soon as possible. The formation of a new government will be an opportunity to begin a genuine dialogue and forge a government that represents the legitimate interests of all Iraqis.
Now, it’s not the place for the United States to choose Iraq’s leaders. It is clear, though, that only leaders that can govern with an inclusive agenda are going to be able to truly bring the Iraqi people together and help them through this crisis. Meanwhile, the United States will not pursue military options that support one sect inside of Iraq at the expense of another. There’s no military solution inside of Iraq, certainly not one that is led by the United States. But there is an urgent need for an inclusive political process, a more capable Iraqi security force, and counterterrorism efforts that deny groups like ISIL a safe haven.

Where's that solution?

Where's that inclusive political process?

"There's no military solution inside Iraq," he said.

But all he's done is take a military approach -- dropping bombs daily, sending US troops in, etc.

Where's the effort on the part of diplomacy?

Where's the work of the State Dept?

Oh, that's right -- John Kerry has a big case of cabinet envy and tries to play Secretary of Defense while ignoring his own State Dept.

And nothing is done to attempt to move Iraq towards a political reconciliation.

David Gardner (FINANCIAL TIMES OF LONDON) observes, "Mr Abadi looks no match for such powerful forces, including militia notionally aligned with his Shia Islamist Da’wa party but ultimately beholden to Iran. His efforts to restore power-sharing between Shia, Sunni and Kurd have so far failed. A sectarian political class, putting faction before state, has hollowed out Iraq into de facto partition. Absent a consensus on how to share Iraq, the question of who governs a liberated Mosul will be an explosive one."

Nothing has changed in two years.

Nothing.

As Ranj Alaaldin (GUARDIAN) observes, "In other words, the conditions that gave rise to Isis in the first place are still there and have been exacerbated, rather than alleviated, over the past two years since the jihadis took control of Mosul in 2014."

Today, Amnesty International issued a press release which included:

Paramilitary militias and government forces in Iraq have committed serious human rights violations, including war crimes, by torturing, arbitrarily detaining, forcibly disappearing and extrajudicially executing thousands of civilians who have escaped areas controlled by the armed group calling itself the Islamic State (IS), said Amnesty International in a new report published today.
The report ‘Punished for Daesh’s crimes’: Displaced Iraqis abused by militias and government forces exposes the terrifying backlash against civilians fleeing IS-held territory, raising alarm about the risk of mass violations as the military operation to recapture the IS-held city of Mosul gets underway.
The report is based on interviews with more than 470 former detainees, witnesses and relatives of those killed, disappeared or detained, as well as officials, activists, humanitarian workers and others.
“After escaping the horrors of war and tyranny of IS, Sunni Arabs in Iraq are facing brutal revenge attacks at the hands of militias and government forces, and are being punished for crimes committed by the group,” said Philip Luther, Research and Advocacy Director for the Middle East and North Africa at Amnesty International.
“Iraq is currently facing very real and deadly security threats from IS, but there can be no justification for extrajudicial executions, enforced disappearances, torture or arbitrary detention.

“As the battle to retake Mosul gets underway, it is crucial that the Iraqi authorities take steps to ensure these appalling abuses do not happen again. States supporting military efforts to combat IS in Iraq must demonstrate they will not continue to turn a blind eye to violations.”

On NPR's ALL THINGS CONSIDERED, Robert Siegel discussed the report with Amnesty's Diana Siegel:

SIEGEL: And your report details a number of specific incidents of what you allege are war crimes. What would you say are the most important findings?

ELTAHAWY: Amnesty International's findings really show a consistent pattern of abuse committed by predominantly Shia militias but also by members of the government forces. I can give you one example from the recent operations to retake Fallujah and surrounding areas.

SIEGEL: Fallujah, a city that had been taken by ISIS and then was retaken by the Iraqi government...

ELTAHAWY: Yes, yes. The prime minister, just like now in the operations for Mosul, has called for the protection of civilians. What happened in reality was very different. We spoke to a number of survivors from an area just north of Fallujah who told us that they were intercepted by a large force of men in different uniforms. And then the men were separated from the women and marched off to be shot dead. And this is 14 men and four boys. And this is just one incident.

In other news, the Turkish government continues to insist that its troops will remain in Iraq -- this despite objection from the Iraqi government.

RT reports that Baghdad witnessed a large protest today outside the Turkish Embassy.

‏@iraqi_day

#BREAKING
Sadr : All PMF leaders agreed on #Turkey as an invaders and we will take necessary steps against it.
#هاي_موصلنا_عراقيه

1 reply31 retweets10 likes

Iraqi Day is speaking of Shi'ite cleric and movement leader Moqtada al-Sadr.

Turning to the US presidential election, PRESS TV notes the WikiLeaks revelations about Democratic Party presidential candidate Hillary Clinton:

Newly released documents show that the State Department sought to shield Clinton from prosecution by pressuring the FBI to drop its insistence that an email on the private server she used while secretary of state contained classified information.
The FBI ultimately decided against declassifying the email's contents, despite pressure from Patrick Kennedy, the State Department’s most senior manager, according to the latest release of interview summaries from the FBI’s year-long investigation into Clinton's exchange of classified government secrets via her unauthorized server.

So it's no surprise that the US government appears to have pressured the government of Ecuador into cutting Julian Assange's internet connection.

The State Dept is denying any US involvement. Does anyone believe them?

‏@HillaryLostMe

RT DrJillStein: If JohnKerry did ask Ecuador to cut off Assange's Internet access, what else is the U.S. hiding? #…

5 replies39 retweets33 likes

Tweeting Yarnie ‏@TweetingYarnie 13 hours ago

Obama and Kerry on behalf of Hillary decided to silence @wikileaks Long before the October surprise? Transparency in our government is gone

23 replies203 retweets396 likes

And while Julian certainly has reviewed the documents, he's not the one hitting publish.

This is more than a little stupid on the part of Hillary's government groupies.

Some are noting how money bought favors -- donating to the Clinton Foundation brought favors from then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. Some are noting her tight relationship witht he Saudis.

‏@medeabenjamin

So Clinton knew Saudis were funding #ISIS and continued to approve weapon sales to Saudis???

1 reply18 retweets17 likes

Donald Trump is the presidential candidate for the Republican Party. He Tweeted:

‏@realDonaldTrump

Hillary’s Aides Urged Her to Take Foreign Lobbyist Donation And Deal With Attacks: 

2,601 replies9,101 retweets14,620 likes

And Adam H. Johnson reminds how 'comedians' posing as news sources time and again come out against free speech.

Jill Stein is the presidential candidate on the Green Party ticket. She's clearly offended British John Oliver. Oliver, not being a US citizen, probably won't be voting in the US elections. In his own country, they have many political parties so it's rather shocking that he's threatened by the same in the US.