"Imagine this was your sister!" screams drama queen Ronan Farrow according to THE NEW YORK TIMES.
Fat Dylan isn't my sister. What I don't have to imagine is that if she's so upset she could sue. Why is she scared of suing Woody Allen in a civil court? Maybe because she's a liar.
She likes to lie and say she's told the same story and never changed it.
Lie. She changed it multiple times as a child when interviewed by doctors and social workers. Later on she began changing it again. Until a few years ago, Woody supposedly inserted a finger in her. That changed and now that never happened. Dylan has never been believable. The social workers who interviewed her didn't believe her. The doctors didn't believe her. She and her mother have lied repeatedly ignoring the words and testimony of Dylan's own psychiatrist. Dylan struggled with the truth and reality which is why Mia had her go into therapy to begin with.
In a twenty minute time frame, Woody supposedly whisked Dylan into an attic/crawl space that you entered through Mia's bedroom and turned on a train, according to Dylan, which was to mask the noise. She doesn't claim to have screamed so what noise would be a good question but a better one would be if Woody had whisked her off in secret, why would he want noise from a train which could tip off people?
Moses Farrow says there was no train in the crawl space. He says it was in the main room where he was sitting. He also says that Woody was not alone with Dylan during that 20 minutes or, in fact, at all that day. Moses was fourteen. Ronan wasn't even five. Ronan has no idea what happened.
Mia has at least two children who have committed suicide. She has a brother serving time in prison for molesting two boys. She has a lot on her plate. Maybe Ronan could help the family by writing about the brother serving time in prison?
For decades it has been known that Mia was not a good mother. She beat Soon-Yi. Moses has talked about how she would beat him. He's written about how she was never wrong and how she would tell him the lie that he was to tell the other children because she was not wrong (even though she was). He's talked about her beating him and forcing him to stand naked in the corner because he cut the belt loops off a pair of his jeans.
She is a trashy piece of filth who said rude things about gay people to Tony Perkins when they did ROMANTIC COMEDY together on Broadway. She was known as a raging homophobe by everyone working on that play. It was this homophobia that had her go into a panic when young Ronan told her that he was a girl. She immediately put him into therapy. She's had to finally address her homophobia when Ronan ended up being gay. She is a hateful person who has been hated on the set of nearly every film she's made. She never became a star and that was all she wanted. It's made her bitter.
While she was with Woody, she was the luckiest actress in the world. Every fall, she had a film role. Some years, she had more than one film role. She was in his film classics BROADWAY DANNY ROSE, ZELIG, HANNAH AND HER SISTERS, ALICE, etc. In those films, many actors and actresses were nominated for Academy Awards. Dianne Wiest and Michael Caine won Academy Awards. Mia was never nominated. She did get nominated for Golden Globes for BROADWAY DANNY ROSE and THE PURPLE ROSE OF CAIRO. She has no film career today and has not had one since she broke up with Woody. Both WIDOW'S PEAK and the film with Sarah Jessica Parker -- MIAMI RHAPSODY which plays like an early version of SEX IN THE CITY -- flopped and that's her entire 90s output other than 'independent' films that no one saw or reviewed. In the '00s, she had a supporting part in the horrible remake of THE OMEN. Not a career. Certainly a come down from being a lead in one film after another while with Woody. In fact, let's note those films:
1982 A Midsummer Night's Sex Comedy Yes Yes [3]
1983 Zelig Yes Yes [3]
1984 Broadway Danny Rose Yes Yes [3]
1985 The Purple Rose of Cairo Yes Yes [3]
1986 Hannah and Her Sisters Yes Yes [3]
1987 Radio Days Yes Yes [3]
1987 September Yes Yes [3]
1988 Another Woman Yes Yes [3]
1989 Crimes and Misdemeanors Yes Yes [3]
1990 Alice Yes Yes [3]
1991 Shadows and Fog Yes Yes [3]
1992 Husbands and Wives Yes Yes
12 films from 1982 to 1992 where she was the lead. There's a point here.
Mia claims Woody assaulted Dylan. She makes that claim in August of 1992. She then starts calling the wardrobe mistress for Woody's MANHATTAN MURDER MYSTERY to ask when she needs to come in and get fitted for that film. Woody then tells her she's crazy after making that claim to think that he will work with her. He replaces her with Diane Keaton. So grasp this, Mia wants us to believe that Woody assaulted Dylan and we're supposed to believe also that after this happened Mia, Dylan's mother, was eager to make a film with him?
Fat Dylan goes around trying to shame people who work with Woody saying 'How could you?' Well maybe she needs to ask her mother that?
Dylan's a liar, Ronan's a liar and Mia's a liar.
And Ronan needs to grasp that Woody -- despite multiple investigations -- was never found guilty of anything. In America, that means you're innocent. Ronan's such a drama queen -- in fact, he's the Rona Barrett of this century.
Here's C.I.'s "Iraq snapshot:"
Wednesday, March 4, 2020. Joe Biden takes the lead -- at least for now -- after Super Tuesday.
ADDED: In Texas, the Democratic Party actively worked to reduce the youth and Latino vote. This was true at UT Austin, this was true in Dallas, Tyler and everywhere including smaller areas like Lindale. They targeted voting groups that they assumed would be Bernie Sanders supporters. These areas were understaffed -- intentionally -- and did not have enough voting machines -- intentionally -- in attempt to create long lines and lengthy waiting time in the hopes that people would leave without voting. Which did happen. USA TODAY has a ridiculous article claiming that Bernie's youth supporters just stayed home. That's not what happened in Texas. I'd be curious to know if this was replicated elsewhere in other states. I learned about this from e-mails from Texas community members and I then made calls to friends with the Democratic Party in Texas. This was not an accident.
ADDED II: 10 minutes after the above went up a friend at NBC called and said, "No, no, no. It's the GOP who closed polling places." The GOP controlled Texas government had closed and scaled back the polling places. That's true. That's not what I'm talking about. I'm talking about the decision to understaff the polling places in certain neighborhoods and that was done with the assistance of the Democratic Party in Texas -- assistance and support.
Go to end of this snapshot for more.
Super Tuesday came and went. One thing to note, March 15th, CNN hosts the next debate. The stage will no longer be crowded with so many already having dropped out. Point? US House Rep and Iraq War veteran Tulsi Gabbard has 1 delegate. She remains in the race. There's no reason to keep her off the stage. The race is now: Tulsi, Michael Bloomberg, Elizabeth Warren, Joe Biden and Bernie Sanders. Michael Bloomberg has 18 delegates and he will be on the stage.
Bloomberg has spent over $500 million and that's what he has to show for it -- 18 delegates so far. Tulsi has not even spent a million and she's got one delegate. Unless she drops out before March 15th, she should be on the stage at the CNN debate. That's basic fairness and she's earned her spot. The DNC was more than happy to break the rules to let Bloomberg on the stage. They should have the decency to allow Tulsi on the stage.
I am not a Tulsi supporter. I'm also not a Joe Biden supporter and I'm aware that Tulsi on stage likely means Tulsi making excuses for Joe -- as she did in the debate that took place at the end of July. There is no benefit for the candidate I'm supporting (Bernie Sanders) for Tulsi to appear on the stage.
But this is about democracy with the little "d" and about the people's right to be informed. Tulsi deserves to be on the stage.
NBC has Joe Biden in the delegate lead after last night with 453. Amy Klobuchar is out the race and has endorsed Joe. You can pretty much toss her 7 votes in with Joe's for his total of 460 and Tiny Pete has dropped out and also endorsed Joe so you can add his 26 to that for a total of 486. Bernie has 373 and Elizabeth Warren has 39. Some have been insisting Elizabeth staying in the race is hurting Bernie. With 39, that's not really hurting him. He would be closer to Joe if he had her votes but he wouldn't be ahead of Joe. And Elizabeth voters would not necessarily go with Bernie.
I don't see a path to victory for her and I don't know why anyone's steal donating to the campaign. In 2008, you could argue that Hillary had a shot even after the press said she didn't. It made sense for her to stay in the race if that's what she wanted.
If Elizabeth wants to stay in the race, she should. But her delegate count is not anywhere near what Hillary had in 2008 and there's no path to victory unless she's thinking that the battle between Joe and Bernie supporters will be so intense at the convention that the DNC will go with a compromise candidate. Were that to happen, the compromise candidate would be off to a bad start -- whether it was Elizabeth or anyone else -- because the two most popular candidates were being sidelined to go with someone that the public really didn't seem to want.
If we had rank choice voting, things might be different for Elizabeth. We don't have it, though. We should, but we don't.
ADDED: In Texas, the Democratic Party actively worked to reduce the youth and Latino vote. This was true at UT Austin, this was true in Dallas, Tyler and everywhere including smaller areas like Lindale. They targeted voting groups that they assumed would be Bernie Sanders supporters. These areas were understaffed -- intentionally -- and did not have enough voting machines -- intentionally -- in attempt to create long lines and lengthy waiting time in the hopes that people would leave without voting. Which did happen. USA TODAY has a ridiculous article claiming that Bernie's youth supporters just stayed home. That's not what happened in Texas. I'd be curious to know if this was replicated elsewhere in other states. I learned about this from e-mails from Texas community members and I then made calls to friends with the Democratic Party in Texas. This was not an accident.
ADDED II: 10 minutes after the above went up a friend at NBC called and said, "No, no, no. It's the GOP who closed polling places." The GOP controlled Texas government had closed and scaled back the polling places. That's true. That's not what I'm talking about. I'm talking about the decision to understaff the polling places in certain neighborhoods and that was done with the assistance of the Democratic Party in Texas -- assistance and support.
Go to end of this snapshot for more.
Super Tuesday came and went. One thing to note, March 15th, CNN hosts the next debate. The stage will no longer be crowded with so many already having dropped out. Point? US House Rep and Iraq War veteran Tulsi Gabbard has 1 delegate. She remains in the race. There's no reason to keep her off the stage. The race is now: Tulsi, Michael Bloomberg, Elizabeth Warren, Joe Biden and Bernie Sanders. Michael Bloomberg has 18 delegates and he will be on the stage.
Bloomberg has spent over $500 million and that's what he has to show for it -- 18 delegates so far. Tulsi has not even spent a million and she's got one delegate. Unless she drops out before March 15th, she should be on the stage at the CNN debate. That's basic fairness and she's earned her spot. The DNC was more than happy to break the rules to let Bloomberg on the stage. They should have the decency to allow Tulsi on the stage.
I am not a Tulsi supporter. I'm also not a Joe Biden supporter and I'm aware that Tulsi on stage likely means Tulsi making excuses for Joe -- as she did in the debate that took place at the end of July. There is no benefit for the candidate I'm supporting (Bernie Sanders) for Tulsi to appear on the stage.
But this is about democracy with the little "d" and about the people's right to be informed. Tulsi deserves to be on the stage.
NBC has Joe Biden in the delegate lead after last night with 453. Amy Klobuchar is out the race and has endorsed Joe. You can pretty much toss her 7 votes in with Joe's for his total of 460 and Tiny Pete has dropped out and also endorsed Joe so you can add his 26 to that for a total of 486. Bernie has 373 and Elizabeth Warren has 39. Some have been insisting Elizabeth staying in the race is hurting Bernie. With 39, that's not really hurting him. He would be closer to Joe if he had her votes but he wouldn't be ahead of Joe. And Elizabeth voters would not necessarily go with Bernie.
I don't see a path to victory for her and I don't know why anyone's steal donating to the campaign. In 2008, you could argue that Hillary had a shot even after the press said she didn't. It made sense for her to stay in the race if that's what she wanted.
If Elizabeth wants to stay in the race, she should. But her delegate count is not anywhere near what Hillary had in 2008 and there's no path to victory unless she's thinking that the battle between Joe and Bernie supporters will be so intense at the convention that the DNC will go with a compromise candidate. Were that to happen, the compromise candidate would be off to a bad start -- whether it was Elizabeth or anyone else -- because the two most popular candidates were being sidelined to go with someone that the public really didn't seem to want.
If we had rank choice voting, things might be different for Elizabeth. We don't have it, though. We should, but we don't.
Impressive victory yesterday for the liberal oligarchy! Big congrats to their corporate media for demonstrating the power of redbaiting and fearmongering. Hats off to Obama, Hillary, Liz, Pete, Amy - nice inside/outside game. #VoteBlueNoMatterWho They Screw! #AnybodyButBernie
Oh, John, let's not leave at the corporate media. Let's include people like Cher.
Cher wouldn't have an Academy Award were it not for who? Jeff Corey. Why did Corey become an acting teacher? Because the red-baiting blacklist of the McCarthy era destroyed his acting career. No one would hire him. So he became a teacher and he taught people like Cher and Jack Nicholson and Jane Fonda and many more.
Cher pays it forward in 2020 by? By red-baiting Bernie Sanders.
What a proud moment for the always reactionary Cher. Actions -- even reactionary ones -- have consequences. I think your smooth easy ride since "Believe" is now over. You've awakened hatered and you will suffer because of it. That's not me, I'm not pleased with what Cher but I still like her as a person. But we live today in a cancel culture and Cher will feel the bark and the bite of that. Sorry, it's called karma.
Joe is in the lead and a lot of liars and losers put him there. Last night, in his speech, he confused his wife with his own sister. That wasn't funny and it wasn't cute. It's a sign that the mind is gone. It's a sign of how confused he is. Yes, many believe Ronald Regan suffered similarly in his second term. That didn't make it right. Joe's not fit for the job.
Donald Trump will not be nice during a debate. He will not be Amy Klobuchar.
In the last debate, Amy had the floor and was talking about a bill she passed and Joe Biden jumped in to insist that he passed that bill.
Amy politely corrected him and then, when he continued to insist that he had passed it, she said they'd leave it up to the fact checkers.
That won't be Donald on stage or after.
And the after is really important.
Many fact checkers went with the lie -- the lie -- that they were both right.
No, they were not both right.
Amy was right. She had the floor and was talking about the bill she put forward. Joe cut her off and started talking about a different bill from long ago.
Liars in the media tried to say, they're both right, they were talking about different bills.
No, Amy was right.
Amy was talking about her bill, had identified the elements of it and Joe interrupted to bring up his bill which was not the same. Joe was wrong.
The corporate media's refusal to be accurate on something so basic will not happen with Donald Trump. If he is right (or thinks he is), he's not going to let it blow over the way Amy did. He's not going to be nice.
Joe is not ready for the debate stage, he is not ready for the presidency.
If Joe manages to win or steal the nomination, we will likely see four more years of Donald Trump and, if that is the case, the DNC and Joe's supporters better ready for the fall out.
Joe campaigns on the past and offers nothing for the future.
Joe Biden has promised his billionaire donors that if he wins the Democratic primary, he will make sure that “nothing would fundamentally change” for them.
That is absolutely unacceptable.
Bernie is the clear choice for those focused on the present and the future.
Joe Queally (COMMON DREAMS) notes:
While there is still much counting of votes to be done before the overall outcome of Super Tuesday is fully calculated and understood, the key takeaway from the Democratic Party's largest single-day of voting thus far—with 14 states up for grabs, including Texas and California—is that what was once the largest presidential field of candidates in living memory is now down to just two: Sen. Bernie Sanders and former Vice President Joe Biden.
As of this writing, Biden—whose campaign was considered all but dead last week but enjoyed a great night for his campaign by steamrolling in the South and nabbing at least two upsets from Sanders—was able to claim victory in eight states: Virginia, North Carolina, Massachusetts, Tennessee, Minnesota, Alabama, Arkansas, and Oklahoma.
Meanwhile, news outlets called the biggest prize of the night, California, for Sanders, who also won in Colorado, Utah, and Vermont.
The corporate press is lost as usual. Many are still on the Bernie has a memo about the differences between him and Joe!
The upcoming story? As a friend on the Bloomberg campaign told me, *supporters* are making clear to Michael Bloomberg that he must destroy at the next debate or drop out -- and by destroy, they're not worried about Bernie. They want him to go after Joe.
“This is a fight for Iraq, not for politicians.” Sharp reporting on Iraqi street protests from @leloveluck & @Mustafa_salimb washingtonpost.com/world/middle_e…
Yes, the protests continue in Iraq.
"The use of innovative nonviolent tactics as well as strong participation by female organizers and protesters is a testament to the rupture with past uprisings in Iraq..."
nonviolent-conflict.org/blog_post/from… #IraqProtests #civilresistance
Watch: Anti-Riot forces continue Repressive practices against #Iraqi protesters at #AlKhilani Square.
#BaghdadPost #IraqProtests
#saveIraqipeople #FreeIraq
Telegram Channel: t.me/TheBaghdadPost…
Iraqi forces again fired hunting guns at demonstrators in Khalani Square today. Tear gas was different from what a normal tear gas should be. Many people collapsing unable to breathe.
#iraqprotests #Baghdadprotests
#Baghdad
The following sites updated:
This Tweet.
People waited HOURS to cast their votes in Texas yesterday.
One man's take: "They must have been doing this on purpose."
“They,” being GOP legislators, ARE doing this on purpose. It's voter suppression—and it's meant to benefit the Republican Party.
Thank you for your reactionary take, Canadian asshole Paul Cogan. No one needs you, stick your nose back into your own damn country. The GOP had little concern with the Democratic Party in Texas. It's a 'red' state. In a general election, Paul Cogan's b.s. might make sense. In a primary, no.
He's an idiot.
i know people who were planning on voting bernie in texas that had to leave the line to go pick up kids from daycare or go to work. 4-7 hour wait times is nothing short of voter suppression. cant believe its even an argument.
KT is correct, it's voter suppression.
Replying to and
You just watched the Democrat party practice voter suppression in Texas and California. And you're sitting here bitching about Republicans. You don't know what you're talking about.
It must be nice that so many stupid people are around to insist that, in a primary, the GOP focus was suppressing the Democratic outcome. This wasn't a general elecction. Propertunist is correct, the Democratic Party practiced voter suppression in Texas (I would assume in California as well but I haven't spoken yet to anyone there about it).
And notice that Eddie Bernice Johnson, Sheila Lee and assorted others did nothing to draw attention to this as it was taking place.
