Tuesday, May 10, 2022

MODERN FAMILY thoughts

Starting with Isaiah's THE WORLD TODAY JUST NUTS "UTool Of Empire"


utool


So Jesse Tyler Ferguson's in the news. He went on basic cable and said that ABC passed on a Cam and Mitch MODERN FAMILY spin-off. Are you surprised? I'm not.

The actor was off putting to many with his politics and that did not include agitating to make sure Mitch was treated more fairly. He was a partisan crier and it got old. Then you had the fact that Mitch and Cam could both come off stereotypical and that Jesse was just an idiot.

A real actor would be demanding reality in the role. Jesse never did. I remember one of the last seasons, think it was the last, for example, opening with Mitche on the lake and a guy who, as a teenager turned him down. And all this time he thought the man turned him down because he was straight. Nope. Mitch then gets upset because he was the only gay teen for miles back then and the guy stillt urned him down.

Problem? Mitch is bringing up that it's the summer of Cher and her album IF I COULD TURN BACK TIME and --

Stop.

Just stop.

HEART OF STONE. That's the name of Cher's album that featured "If I Could Turn Back Time.'' This happened all the time -- including a Diana Ross wig that was not at all reflective ot the RCA years depit telling the audience it was.

If you can't ge the facts right, why include real details. It was sloppy.

Ty wasn't sloppy. When they gave a detail to Phil, Ty made sure it was factually right and also made sure it was something Phil would know and be into. Jesse was way too lazy and there were so many storylines in the first half of the series that didn't match up because he didn't care enough to keep track of his character. I actually think he focused on nothing but reciting lines. Sorry, I watched THE CLASS. He gave the exact same performance there and the character he played there was supposed to be straight -- and in love with that awful Darlene from ROSEANNE.

Eric did a better job keeping Cam realistic and keeping the character consistent.

Jesse just appeared to show up for a pay check.

He also apparently did not get along with the actress who played Pam and that's why she was banished suddenly. That's too bad because Cam's sister Pam was hilarious. In fact, the whole reason to do a spin-off was to team up Cam and Pam. They were so funny together.

The obvious choice for a spin-off would have been the kids. Make it Haley and Dylan with the kids and Uncle Luke.

Alex is supposed to be getting a sitcom, the actress who played her. I think on NBC. And Julie Bowman (Claire) is supposed to be getting her own CBS program.

I honestly think they should have tried to have scaled back the cast and kept the show going. Let Gloria and Jay go off screen and travel the world. Center the new show around Phil and Clair as the head of the family and let Haley and Luke keep living with them. I think ti would have worked.

Even with Dylan. And I say "even with Dylan" because I thought it was a mistake to marry those two. Andy and Haley were a better pair. Even the British professor. Dylan was like Phil with no energy and a sad-sack. I would've gone with Andy because Adam DeVine is hilarious.

Here's C.I.'s "Iraq snapshot:"


Tuesday, May 10, 2022.   Iraq's ongoing political stalemate hits the seven month mark with no end in sight, Us forces shoot up Iraqi homes, and  much more


The Iraq War has not ended.  Yesterday, US forces opened fire on homes in Erbil.  ALSUMARIA TV reports that the US is saying this was an accident and a training exercise.  Let's accept that for the moment, if true, why were US forces -- there, we are told, only for training on basis -- out and about and firing on homes in Erbil?


No, it doesn't make sense.


Amr Salem (IRAQI NEWS) notes:


The governor of Basrma town in Erbil governorate reported Tuesday that US forces mistakenly opened fire at several houses in the town, according to Baghdad Today news.


[. . .]


Other news reports indicated that six missiles fired by the US forces hit houses in a crowded area in Basrma injuring civilians.

Concerned Iraqi security officials started investigations to find out how the accident took place.


ABNA 24 adds, "Released images of the incident show that civilian houses and vehicles were damaged in the area, but more details have not yet been released."


11 homes were shot up.


From 11 to 10, it is now May 10th, know what that means?  We'll jog memories.  October 10th, Iraqis turned out to vote.  All this time later, they've still failed to elect a president and have failed to name a prime minister-designate which means there's no real Cabinet.  Their term expired back in October.


And don't try to b.s. your way through that.  In 2010, the western press went along with then-prime minister Nouri al-Maliki's claim that Iraq had no vice president because there terms were expired and no new government had been elected.  So let's stop pretending that there's a legal cabinet from the holdover government.  


It's now seven months after the election.


In 2010, Iraq set the record for the longest time between an election and finally forming a government -- eight months.  Now unlike the floundering Moqtada al-Sadr today, in 2010, the problem was Nouri refused to step down.  He lost and he wouldn't step down.  Originally, the US government said they would stand with the winner.  Then Samantha Power bent Barack Obama's ear and they started backing the loser -- Nouri.  They would go on to negotiate The Erbil Agreement which would toss the votes of the Iraqi people aside and give Nouri a second term -- which would result in the rise of ISIS in Iraq. 


In October 2010, JJ Sutherland (NPR) wrote:


It may not be a record to be proud of, but, hey, at least it's something. Iraq has now not had a government after a parliamentary election longer than anybody, ever. The Washington Post is reporting that the Netherlands held that honor until today, back in 1977 they went without an elected government for 207 days, today marks Iraq's 208th.

Leila Fadhil of the Post quotes one of the great Iraq watchers and a Dutchman himself, Joost Hiltermann.

"There is no difference with the Iraqi case, except that the Netherlands had strong, functioning institutions and a caretaker government that continued to govern," said Joost Hiltermann, a Dutch national and an expert on Iraq at the International Crisis Group. "Iraq has very weak institutions and a caretaker government that can do very little. This makes for a potentially highly unstable and precarious situation."

The election was close, incumbent Prime Minister Nuri al-Maliki's Shi'ite party won 89 seats in parliament, while former Prime Minister and secular Shi'ite Iyad Allawi's party won 91 seats. And, it being Iraq, there are other parties and players that also have been angling for power. Negotiations, now in their 208th day, have produced no result.


That was October 1, 2010.  Parliament would only move forward on November 11, 2010.  207 days on October 1st.  30 more days in October takes that to 237.  Add the 10 days of Noember (possibly 11 since it's considered ended on the 11th) and you have 247 days.  


Now in 2010, Nouri refused to accept losing, refused to step down, refused to move out of the prime minister's home, etc.


There has been no such refusal this go round.  But seven months later, it's seven months now, and it's still not been resolved, the political stalemate has continued because of ineptitude.


Now the Constitution -- which is never followed -- has the way for a prime minister-designate to move over to the prime minister by forming a Cabinet.  Now that's not followed.  Even when, like Hayder al-Abadi, they swear that it's going to be followed this time.


The reason for that being in the Constitution?  If you can't form a Cabinet, you can't govern.


To form a Cabinet, you have to make deals, do horse trading, prove you can work with the majority.


No one's done that, they haven't followed that aspect of the Constitution once.  So it's no surprise that the various government's have failed the people and refused to address their needs.


But grasp that the failure right now is happening not with the Cabinet forming.  It's no where near that level yet.  You have various groups and none can horse trade, none can work with others well enough to form a government.


This is a new low and it should alarm the international community.  


But there's no honesty in the international community.


When they do bother to realize that this not normal and should not be acceptable, they rush to shame the Kurds.


How many times has it been explained that the Kurds are a minority population in Iraq?


Now of Kurds who chose to vote, the majority are represented by the KDP while the PUK political party represents the next largest group of voters.  (The KDP got 31 seats while the PUK got 18 seats.)


This is not the fault of the Kurds.  Quit blaming them.  The KDP is siding with Moqtada al-Sadr while the PUK has sides with the Coordination Framework (which is run by many -- including Nouri al-Maliki).  


This is beyond stupid to blame the Kurds. Now, yes, usually the western world is able to blackmail or guilt the Kurds into this or that.  It's why there is no Kurdish homeland to this day.  They are the largest ethnic population on the planet without a nation-state.  


Shi'ites are the dominant group in Iraq.  And Moqtada's grouping -- no this political party -- got 73 seats.  Other Shi'ite groups did well also.  Nouri's State of Law got 33 seats.  


The PUK and the KDP are split, they're not united.  One of the reasons is that the PUK has had the presidency since the US invaded Iraq.  Back then the PUK and the KDP were close to the same level of popularity.  However, since the Talabani family defrauded Iraq (pretending Jalal was healthy and recovering when he couldn't speak and he couldn't move and should have been replaced as president), their polarity has soured.  Gorran, with the help of CIA-seed money, managed to overtake the PUK.  And then they decided to get in bed with the PUK and had a disaster at the polls in October.  But the KDP feels that they should have the presidency -- by custom, Iraq awards that office (largely ceremonial) to a Kurd, the Speaker of Parliament goes to a Sunni and the prime minister is a Shi'ite.  


Moqtada, representing one Shi'ite faction, and Nouri representing aonther?  Those are where the big votes are.  The PUK, for example, could be dropped immediately without any real loss if the Coordination Framework was able to appeal to others -- Shi'ites, Sunnis, minority candidates, etc.  


This has been an abject failure.  


It also gets to how wrong Moqtada and others have been claiming the problem was the system of government and that's why he was going to come up with a different formation -- he was going to do a national majority government.  That was the answer.  Well it hasn't been and the problems appear to be even worse with what Moqtada's attempted.  Yet, Moqtada's MP Hassan al-Adhari tells ALSUMARIA that they are still pursuing that majority government.


April 1st, he bowed out.  He announced a forty day hold on his actions.  He wanted to see if his opponents could form a government (or he wanted to prove that they couldn't -- depending upon how you look at it).  


This has all been one long failure and the problem isn't the Kurds no matter what the western press screeches and hisses.  These are the same whores, remember, who told you that Moqtada was a "kingmaker."  He had no experience being that, but whores make their money from inflating tiny things -- i.e. "No, baby, it's huge.  I've never seen one that big before."


And that's what they did with Moqtada.  They lied then, they lie now.  



Meanwhile, ALMADA's Hussein al-Amel reports that hundreds of graduates shut down Dhi Qar Oil Company as well as the Directorate of Education wih a sit-in as they demanded job opportunities.  In the meantime, oil workers have been sent home.  In April, the Iraqi Army destroyed the base the activists were operating from -- including their tents -- when they stopped their sit-ins to observe Ramadan.


In yesterday's snapshot, we noted the rise of Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever (CCHF) in Iraq  This morning, RUDAW reports:

 


The Kurdistan Region on Tuesday recorded the first case of Congo fever amid an outbreak in Iraq’s southern provinces.

Erbil General Directorate of Health reported the first Congo hemorrhagic fever in the city. The infected person is 17-year-old and has been hospitalized.

The directorate did not disclose further details.

The Crimean-Congo hemorrhagic fever, also known as Congo fever, is tick-borne and causes severe hemorrhaging, according to the World Health Organization (WHO). It has been endemic to Iraq since 1979 and reappeared again last year.



We'll wind down with this from The Feminist Majoarity:


I’m circling with a brief update here, Common Ills, after last week’s devastating news about the leaked draft opinion out of SCOTUS.

Majority Leader Chuck Schumer has confirmed — the Senate will be voting THIS WEEK on the Women’s Health Protection Act:

Screenshot of a tweet from Chuck Schumer that reads: I’m standing with elected officials and women’s rights advocates in NY because the Supreme Court’s reported decision is an abomination. The Senate will vote this week on the Women’s Health Protection Act to protect abortion rights. We will see where every single senator stands.

Please continue to contact your Senators ASAP to urge them to vote YES for the Women’s Health Protection Act this week.

See Ellie’s note below.
-KS

From: Ellie Smeal <reply@feministmajority.org>
Sent: Tuesday, May 3, 2022 7:01 PM
To: You
Subject: fed up and fired up



Isaiah's THE WORLD TODAY JUST NUTS "UTool Of Empire" went up last night.  The following sites updated:




 

Posted by at