Elaine told me I needed to post. Here's who posted so far this morning:
That roundtable last night was long. I did think others would post. Sorry. Guess everybody was tired. I was planning to post later tonight and will either tonight or Saturday.
But I can do a post now. I can do Idiots of the week.
There are two.
One really was from the week before.
Let's start with her. So a new episode of SUPERMAN AND LOIS aired this week. My daughter and I went to YOUTUBE on Wednesday to watch but (as I noted "SUPERMAN AND LOIS") it wasn't there I didn't realize that at first and just grabbed the latest episode in our cloud. It starts playing the recap and I'm thinking, "Huh?" Then the episode starts and it's from the week before. But I am still amazed by that first scene.
Lana gets one of the Idiots of the week.
So Clark has just gone up in the air to reveal that he was Superman to her. And then that episode ended and the next one (last week's) had started there.
She wants to know how he was able to keep the secret why didn't anyone know????
And Clark kindly says that people see what they want to.
I'm sure.
But that doesn't excuse Lana. She dated Clark. She's known him forever. She's seen Superman up close in the flesh. And the only difference is that sometimes Clark has a bit of a stubble on his chin and that Clark wears glasses. He's the same height, it's the same hair on his head. it's the same eyes, the same nose -- it's just those glasses.
And Lana couldn't figure it out?
Idiot.
When the episode aired that ended with Clark flying/floating to show Lana he was Superman, I wrote:
Clark's decided to tell Lana the truth. Lois is against it but the boys are on board.
He needs to because Lana looks like an idiot this episode.
She is alone with Superman forever. And Superman doesn't wear a mask.
She's staring him right in the face and she can't tell he's Clark.
She's telling Sara she's fine and that she just got caught up in something. (Superman explained to her that OJ wasn't Jon but a Jon from another planet.)
She is driving when she tells Sara she has to get off the phone. Why? She sees Clark up ahead.
He tells her he needs to tell her something and it's important and he should have told her a long time ago. She's telling him she's had an awful day and it's not a good time and he can't know how awful her day was --
He interrupts with yes, he can because he was there.
He takes off his glasses and she still doesn't seem to get it.
So he floats on the air and she's staring and finally she's like, "You're Superman." He uses his breath to freeze some limbs on a nearby tree.
So
that's how it ends. And thank goodness because she looked like the
biggest idiot in the world by not getting that he's Superman when she's
around Clark constantly and Clark and Superman have the same exact face
but Clark wears glasses.
And back in July of last year, I wrote:
It has another real problem. And I love the show but there is another real problem.
Episode before last, you had Lana with Superman and she never notices? Then the episode that aired most recently we see how Lois and Clark met. And she falls in love with dorky Clark (I don't think Clark's a dork, I think he's a person with integrity in a world where few have it). She's then interviewing Superman. Superman finds out how she feels when a producer pulls her away and says there's sexual tension between her and Superman and she responds no, there's not, she's in love with dorky Clark and she hasn't even told Clark.
How stupid are these people supposed to be?
Clark is not Bruce Wayne. He's not pulling on a mask and becoming Batman. He's taking off his glasses and sporting stubble. That's it.
If Lois is in love with Clark and standing in front of Superman, why can't she tell they are one and the same? Or at least that they are two guys who look strangely alike.
Lana, for those who don't know the story -- forget the show -- is Clark's high school girlfriend in Smallville. She can't tell that Superman and Clark are the same? That Superboy and Clark are the same. Or at least that they look enough alike to be twins?
Now we're supposed to buy that Lois Lane, not just a girlfriend but the love of his life, can't tell that Clark and Superman look the same?
In the Superman movies with Christopher Reeve, you had him at least change his hair as Superman.
Tyler Hoechlin does a great job playing the part.
But this is nonsense. It's getting worse each episode. I don't care about all that came before in the comics. I'm watching a new show in the 21st century and the 'undercover' hero hides in his secret identity by wearing . . . a pair of glasses.
It's nonsense.
I thought Kyle was going to catch on this season and that the point there would be that Kyle, unlike Lana and Lois, is not in love with Clark so he could see clearly. And I would've accepted that as a valid point. We can be blinded by love.
But with no one picking up on it? Not Lana, not Lois, not Kyle?
Or his two kids -- his own two kids.
Seems like someone needs to be wearing glasses and it's not Clark. A lot of someones need to be wearing glasses.
So she's an idiot. She's a fictional character, though.
What's Norman Solomon's excuse?
He's for real -- he's a fake ass, but he's for real. He's whining about nuclear war at COUNTERPUNCH. Like he used to whine about the Iraq War before he became a pledged delgate for Barack Obama ahead of the 2008 DNC convention -- remember that?
Remember how cheap whore Norman lied about the repeatedly on the air, refused to disclose it.
Whore.
He's an idiot if he thinks anyone takes him seriously today.
We saw through you, Whore. You walked away from the Iraq War because Bully Boy Bush was out of the White House and you couldn't hold your boyfriend Barack accountable.
So go f**k yourself, Solomon, no one believes you. We've seen through your fake assery.
US troops remain in Iraq and you don't give a s**t. You stopped caring the minute Bully Boy Bush left the White House.
You're the idiot, Norman Solomon, not We The People.
Here's C.I.'s "Iraq snapshot" for Thursday:
Thursday, June 9, 2022. We look at a local election in the US and a consensus appears to be building in Iraq on how to end the political stalemate that hits the 8 month mark tomorrow.
The most significant results Tuesday were in two municipal contests in California. San Francisco District Attorney Chesa Boudin was recalled in a special election, by a margin of 60 percent to 40 percent. In Los Angeles, real estate mogul Rick Caruso and Congresswoman Karen Bass finished as the top two candidates in the mayoral primary and will face each other in the November runoff.
Boudin, a left liberal backed by the Bernie Sanders wing of the Democratic Party along with its pseudo-left supporters, was first elected in 2019 campaigning against police brutality and excessively long jail terms. He clashed repeatedly with the police unions and real estate and other business groups and became a focal point for a right-wing law-and-order campaign, aimed particularly at whipping up fears in the Asian community over a sharp rise in anti-Asian violence.
Once enough signatures had been gathered to force a recall, with support from both the Republican Party and the Democratic Party establishment, business interests, including hedge funds and venture capitalists poured in more than $4 million to promote the vote to remove Boudin.
Like the recall of three members of the San Francisco school board earlier this year, right-wing forces took advantage of the political bankruptcy of identity politics with its incessant emphasis on racial divisions. Boudin and his supporters presented police violence as the product solely of racism, concealing the class role of the police as the defenders of capitalist property against the working class.
The complete failure of the Biden administration to improve the conditions of life for working people, to say nothing of the Democratic Party-run state government in Sacramento and the administration of Democratic Mayor London Breed, created widespread popular anger and disgust and indifference to the fate of Boudin.
The result was an election in which there was a sizeable turnout only in the wealthiest areas of the city. Overall voter turnout plunged: from the huge 449,866 anti-Trump vote in 2020, to only 123,926 votes in the recall. Tuesday’s vote was only half as large as the 251,032 votes cast in the special election for mayor in 2018 which put London Breed in office.
The vote will be seized on by Democratic politicians to use as a shield against Republican attacks seeking to link the Democrats to the calls to “defund the police” that arose after the 2020 police murder of George Floyd in Minneapolis, which led to massive worldwide protests against police violence.
I agree with Patrik that the establishment Dems will use this to justify further sell outs. But on the race . . . The race could have been closer and could have gone Chesa's way -- see Elaine's "Chesa defeated Chesa" for her thoughts.
I love Roseanne Barr. That doesn't mean I agree with her on everything. We disagree regarding Palestinians, obviously. But Roseanne described San Francisco a few years back. Two? Maybe three? It was an ugly description of a place I've made my home.
But it was also a valid description. It predated Chesa. Chesa was supposed to bring in a new approach. That's why he was elected.
But he refused to sell his approach. He should have been on all the public affairs programs talking about what was happening, what he was doing to address things and assured people that things were changing.
It's also true that crimes against Asian-Americans have increased in the city -- hugely. Some would argue this is a result of communities competing -- or feeling they are -- aginst one another for limited resources. Chesa's programs were supported by a greater percentage of African-Americans than by Asian-Americans. And a lot of high profile cases that the media covered were African-American attacks on Asian-Americans. Chesa needed to communicate with the Asian-American communities and he failed at that. Let's not pretend that the opposition invented a division and used that successfully.
They took a very real division and they amplified it.
Chesa should have long ago addressed that division. His faltering support in the Asian-American community was clear as far back as 2020 and he failed to seriously address that issue. You were left with a community that felt targeted (and statistics would bear out that they were) and felt the district attorney was blowing this off and ignoring them. They may not have supported his policies if he'd done any real outreach but they would have known he was at least aware of them. I don't think Chesa ever got the make up of this city. I think he came in with some interesting ideas about ways to make things better but I don't think he knew this city.
There are serious issues and a new approach was needed. But Chesa didn't sell the approach. He didn't explain how we might take a temporary hit due to X program but there is a long range benefit. He believed in his programs but he wouldn't sell them. A friend said he acted as though we were a collective and would just support him. No, because a collective works together and everyone is informed of what's taking place.
Was he afraid he'd be giving people ammo to use against him?
I don't know. But he didn't make a case for what he was doing.
Before he assumed office, we already had huge problems and his new tactics did not stop those problems -- they might have if given more time and we might have been willing to stand with him (I voted to keep him) but we needed to be on the same page.
Like every other major city, we need to be addressing the homeless problem. Like every other major city, we need to be addressing crime. And it's not right to dismiss some store owners' concern. Those owners include Asian-Americans, they include everyone. And people were struggling before the pandemic and it only got worse after the pandemic started.
Chesa can speak very movingly but he didn't find his voice once elected. He refused to use it.
So we were left with the results of life post-Chesa winning office and it wasn't what people wanted. The results. If Chesa believed in his program and had spoken of how they were and would be addressing these issues, he would have done better and possibly might have held on to his offic
And he should have been speaking all along. He should have people sharing their own stories of how this or that change did help them personally. He didn't want to sell his policies. Hopefully, he'll learn from this. 40% of the vote was amazing. San Francisco needs massive improvement and that does include people feeling safe. When Rosanne made her statements in an interview some years back, they weren't kind. But they also weren't false. And they weren't of one class the way some are trying to portray it. The shoplifting is not just a business owner's issue. The shop lifting effected a lot of people including those struggling who would say they felt like idiots because they were paying for things in a city that some didn't have to. They wanted a level playing field. This is a transitional time for San Francisco and we did need someone like Chesa who cared about more than Big Business.
The opposition to Chesa were on message. And they also had reality on their side as well because this is not the San Francisco that the city needs to be. But if Chesa had sold his programs, had spoken out about where we were headed with these programs, I do think the vote would have been closer.
I don't know where our city goes now, but I hope that Chesa learns from this because he still has a lot to offer. And I would argue against simplistic readings of thie results -- especially, if you haven't been in San Francisco and you don't know our issues.
Elections. Iraq held elections October 10th. Still no prime minister. Still no president. The llatest development?
So if he carries this out, he's attempting to dissolve the Parliament and trigger new elections?
If so, that's not that far from what Ayad Allawi proposed over the weekend. Shafaq News explains, "The National Iraqiya coalition led by Iyad Allawi called on Sunday to form an interim government to run the country’s affairs and rerun the parliamentary elections." INA reported:
Allawi said in a statement received by the Iraqi News Agency (INA),
"After the political process has reached a state of stagnation and halt,
which portends dire consequences, and after numerous appeals from
national political and social figures, our national and moral duty
prompts us to put forward an initiative and develop an appropriate
solution for the country's current crisis."
He
indicated that "in order to preserve the unified homeland, achieve the
people's hopes and aspirations for growth and prosperity and ensure a
decent life for their them, and in order to restore part of the
confidence in the political process after the great upheavals, getting
out of the crisis requires taking a number of steps and in a period to
be determined during an unconditional patriotic meeting for national
political leaders, the date of which will be determined at a later time.
He
explained, "The steps will contribute to stopping violations of
constitutional timings, and is represented in choosing an interim
government that works to achieve security and stability in Iraq, that
takes upon itself the holding of fair elections, and the selection of a
new commission to organize the upcoming elections that enjoys the
confidence of the Iraqi people and works with transparency and high
integrity, as well as achieving a new electoral law that fulfills the
requirements of the decisions of the Federal Supreme Court in a manner
that guarantees a fair representation of the Iraqi people.
He
noted, "The position of the Prime Minister is the actual conflict, and
therefore the Prime Minister-designate in the interim government must be
given the freedom to choose his ministerial (cabinet) provided that its
standard is efficiency and integrity, and he manages the affairs of the
country and implements a government program that works to meet the
needs of the people and provide what is needed. ,” noting that the
initiative also included “strengthening the state, the government, and
the three presidencies and supporting them in facing external and
internal challenges and pressures, in addition to discussing during the
meeting (the conference) other important issues that are included in the
conference’s agenda, and that the forces, national political figures
and parties that It has seats in the parliament , as well as
representatives of federations and trade unions, and an open meeting to
approve the proposal’s formula and choose the figures for the three
presidencies in the interim government.
DRAW MEDIA Tweeted:
If a consensus is emerging, it appears to be that new elections are required.
In other news, AFP reports:
Three people were wounded Wednesday evening after an armed drone struck a
road in the suburbs of Iraqi Kurdistan’s Irbil, security services said.
“Several vehicles were damaged” in the attack, the Kurdistan Autonomous
Counter-Terrorism Agency said in a statement, which took place on the
road that connects Irbil to Pirmam to its northeast.
The attack, which was not immediately claimed, took place three
kilometers from the construction site of the new US consulate on the
outskirts of central Irbil.
Iraqi President Barham Salih also voiced his condemnation of the attack, calling it "criminal" and saying it is a violation of the country's safety.
"The attack on the city of Erbil is a condemned and reprehensible criminal act targeting national efforts....We must stand firmly against attempts to plunge the country into chaos and undermine security and stability," the president tweeted, urging for a strengthening of security services against "outlaws."
Reber Ahmed, the Kurdistan Regional Government's (KRG) interior minister, told reporters at the hospital that one of the three injured civilians is in critical condition due to the explosion.
The UN Assistance Mission to Iraq (UNAMI) described the attack as "reckless" and said "Iraq does not need self-proclaimed armed arbiters," calling on the state to solidify its stance and hold those responsible accountable.
No group has claimed responsibility for the attack, but such attacks are often attributed to Iran-backed militias who have launched a spate of attacks against Kurdish land in recent months.
Hossein Dalirian, affiliated with Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), was one of the first individuals who described the attack as a drone strike, at a time when the Kurdistan Region's authorities had not specified the means of the attack.
The following sites updated:
-
-
-
Amber Heard does not speak for this L9 hours ago
-
-
SUPERMAN AND LOIS10 hours ago
-
Let's build our community10 hours ago
-
Michael Buble10 hours ago
-
Chesa defeated Chesa10 hours ago
-
-
