The
New York Times’ Maggie Haberman said members of Donald Trump’s inner
circle have privately acknowledged making a major mistake in the
planning of the GOP’s first-ever midterm convention, which is set to
take place next Wednesday and Thursday in Dallas.
On
Tuesday’s broadcast of MS NOW’s “Morning Joe,” host Jonathan Lemire
noted watching football is one of the “very few things that American
culture, society agrees on right now” before pointing out that the first
two games of the new NFL season will take place on the same days as the
political event.
“So he’s not going to even get the eyeballs he wanted,” Lemire said.
“No,
he is not,” Haberman acknowledged. “And that was an error that some
people around him privately acknowledge was something they had not been
paying attention to.”
The scheduling blunder
speaks, Haberman said, “to how small his circle is” and “how tiny this
group of people who are not just making decisions in the government, but
who are advising him politically” has become.
“They’re
not looking at broader pictures like this,” she continued. “They are in
survival mode, and again, that’s fine for themselves, but you have all
of these members of Congress, you have senators who are complaining
privately.”
Chump is so out of
touch. Completely out of touch. He thinks it's still 1989. Old man
with dementia. Excuse me, fat old man with dementia. Scarlett O'Toole (IRISH TIMES) reports:
CNN aired a damning assessment of Donald Trump's controversial White House makeover.
Former
White House lawyer Ty Cobb joined CNN host Erin Burnett on Monday
night's episode of OutFront to discuss Trump's demolition of the East
Wing of the White House. The Supreme Court has ruled that construction
of Trump's planned ballroom can resume.
In a
5-4 ruling, justices went back on a lower court ruling to pause
construction. The Supreme Court found the National Trust for Historic
Preservation, which challenged Trump's ballroom project, lacked standing
to bring the case. The president has spent a lot of money on the White House makeover.
Speaking
on OutFront on August 31, host Burnett said, "One of the other things
that the chief justice said was, and I quote from his dissent, ‘The
White House is an iconic American building whose symbolism and history
are wrapped up in its architecture.' That is, in a sense, a non-legal
statement, right? That is a statement that’s somehow more profound than
that."
Cobb replied, "Yeah,
very much so. I mean, it certainly touched me because, as somebody who
had spent a lot of time in the White House and, and in or about the
grounds, you know, it was a beautiful setting and a historic setting.
"And
it’s, you know, it’s turning into some combination of a w---ehouse and
Las Vegas at this stage of the game with all the golden paving of it.
So, it’s tragic what’s going on. But sadly, it’s gonna continue, at
least for the time being."
He has no taste and he's turning the White House into something tacky. Thomas Kika reports:
President
Donald Trump appears to fear a third impeachment above almost anything
else his enemies could level at him, but according to The Hill, he has
been making one "inevitable" following the midterms, with his many
unlawful actions essentially "daring them to do it."
The
Hill's Chris Stirewalt published a new analysis of the situation on
Monday morning, noting the different polling outfits consistently
predict Democrats will retake the House majority in the November
midterms, with predictions varying from a 12- to a 16-seat majority.
While some in the opposition party have signaled a hesitance to pursue
another impeachment that will fail in the Senate, many others are still
pushing for it, making the process seem inevitable.
As
Stirewalt argued, Trump has certainly made this inevitability easier
for the Democrats, given the conduct of his administration since his
return to the White House. The only difficulty they might run into, he
suggested, would be choosing which high crime or misdemeanor to go
after.
"In the three modern impeachments, the
very act of beginning the process has unlocked congressional
superpowers," he explained. "And Trump would be daring them to do it —
he of the crypto billions, the gifted jumbo jet, the drug boat kill
teams and the budget impoundment. The biggest challenge would be
deciding what to include and what to leave out."
Democrats
also have a real shot, if not a sure-fire shot, at retaking the Senate
majority as well, and this, Stirewalt added, would give a third
impeachment some real weight, even if they ultimately would lack the
two-thirds supermajority needed to remove Trump from office altogether.
He
needs to be impeached. And he needs to be removed from office. He
needs to be put into a nursing home that specializes in dementia care.
But since he soils himself, he will probably be limited in the nursing
homes that will accept him. (Unless that was just a myth in that
She-Devils mini-series from the 80s.) Poor, petulant Chump. Can't you
see him griping and screeching while he poops his pants and the staff
tries to reason with him before an orderly finally just tells him to
shut up because no one needs to hear his hateful remarks.
We
need to expand the Supreme Court. Mike Johnson, Speaker of the Closet,
is scared to death of that and is now championing some sort of
Constitutional Amendment to stop it. Hayes Brown (MS NOW) reports:
The
House is in session this week before darting off again on another
recess. The week’s marquee vote was a short-term resolution to avert a
government shutdown ahead of the midterm elections. But alongside that
bill on Tuesday’s schedule was a rarity: a proposed amendment to the
Constitution up for a vote in the full House.
The proposed amendment is simple:
‘The Supreme Court of the United States shall be composed of nine
justices consisting of one chief justice and eight associate justices.’’
The GOP leadership is likely putting this proposed amendment forward to
demonize Democrats as being in favor of “court packing.”
Whether the bill’s sponsors realize it or not, though, its very
existence concedes something vital: The choice of how many seats are on
the Supreme Court is entirely up to Congress.
Many Americans likely assume that the current size of the court is already enshrined in the Constitution. Article III, Section 1
is actually silent on the number: “The judicial Power of the United
States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior
Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish.” Even
the words “Chief Justice” aren’t mentioned anywhere within Article III.
The job only exists by inference given Article I’s requirement “the
Chief Justice shall preside” over presidential impeachment trials in the
Senate. It instead fell to Congress, beginning with the Judiciary Act
of 1789, to flesh out the powers and responsibilities that Chief Justice
John Roberts now holds.
[. . .]
[US
House Rep. Andy] Biggs makes several misleading assumptions in his
claims during the committee debate and his statement after. First, he
casts any talk of expansion as an assault on the Constitution and treats
nine as the only number of seats that represents “legitimacy.” As I
documented two years ago, “despite the backlash against President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s failed effort
to add Supreme Court seats in 1937 that has kept such proposals at bay,
history is well on the side of court expansionists.” Over its lifetime,
the court’s membership has grown and shrunk multiple times, starting
with six and growing as large as 10 members.
Each
change has been at the discretion of Congress. The last time the
court’s size shrunk was after the Civil War, when lawmakers reduced the
number of seats from 10 to seven to winnow out the number of Southerners
serving. Despite Biggs’ scolding, in fact, the makeup of the court has
always been wrapped up in politics. A few years later, in 1869, the
court was expanded to the present nine seats to align with the then-nine circuits that each justice oversees. Today there are 11 numbered circuits, plus the federal and District of Columbia circuits, giving plenty of reason beyond politics to expand the number of justices.
It’s
also odd of Biggs to suggest the main role of the Supreme Court is to
“protect Americans from government overreach.” That may be the current
conservative majority’s goal — at least when a Democrat is president —
but it is by no means inherent. Similarly, between the Supreme Court and
Congress, the latter is by far the more democratic institution of the
two. If duly elected lawmakers use their power to expand the court, it
is will within their power and right to do so.
Wednesday, September 2, 2026. Thomas Massie has another discharge
petition for The Epstein Files, Greg Abbott does not protect girls in
sports as evidenced by the predator that's been in Texas for some time
and Greg's looked the other way, Chump's lies about Venezuelan oil are
just the latest in a series of lies, Pete Hegseth shows how 'manly' and
'mature' he is by mocking a girl in high school, and much more.
Starting with Jeffrey Epstein, Donald
Chump's roll dog of many decades who died in jail, Todd Blanche, as
deputy attorney general, as acting Attorney General and now as Attorney
General, has refused to follow the law regarding the release of the
Epstein files.. So now there's a move to beef the law up. US House Rep
Thomas Massie named names. Tara Suter (THE HILL) reports:
Rep.
Thomas Massie (R-Ky.), who has been a key figure in the push to release
files linked to the convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein in the last
few years, read off more than a dozen names of what he said were
“Epstein coconspirators” on Monday.
“On the
House floor tonight, I read the names of several Epstein coconspirators
who should be investigated and prosecuted,” Massie said in a Monday
night post on the social platform X.
“I also
began collecting 218 signatures for the discharge petition to force a
vote on Epstein Files Transparency Act II,” he added.
Massie’s
post included a clip of himself on the House floor, where he said it
had “been a year since the president signed the Epstein Files
Transparency Act,” referencing legislation he spearheaded alongside Rep.
Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) last year that resulted in the release of some
files linked to Epstein.
“And the government continues
to withhold over three million files. That’s why we’ve introduced the
Epstein Files Transparency Act II, to bring the fight to the state
courts, accountability to the Department of Justice and closure for
survivors. We want perpetrators of these crimes to be investigated and
prosecuted,” he added.
Among
the names Massie provided were Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor (former
Prince Andrew of England), David Copperfield (magician) and Jes Staley
(whom we noted in last Friday's snapshot). Khaleda Rahman (NEWSWEEK) provides the full fourteen names, "In
the order Massie named them, they are: Jes Staley, Leon Black, Les
Wexner, David Copperfield, Lapo Elkann, Tom Pritzker, Glenn Dubin,
Frédéric Fekkai, Eduardo Teodorani, Jean-Luc Brunel, Daniel Siad, Ramsey
Elkholy, Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor and Lesley Groff."
A
discharge petition requires 218 signatures and forces a bill or
resolution to be brought directly to the House floor for consideration,
even if it's previously been held up in the committee process.
The
second petition is designed to force the release of files the
government has redacted and gives state attorneys general, Epstein's
victims and members of Congress standing to challenge the Justice
Department in court over aspects of the original law it has not
followed.
"I never anticipated that the highest
law enforcement officer in the land would not enforce the law once it
became a law. That's what this addresses. We try to dot the i's and
cross the t's here," Massie told The Washington Times. "This is somewhat
unprecedented that Todd Blanche is stonewalling a state attorney
general, so this unambiguously gives the attorneys general in the
various states the ability to prosecute these crimes by giving them
unfettered access to the files."
J.D. Wolf (MEIDASTOUCH NEWS) adds, "On
Tuesday morning, Massie escalated the pressure on Speaker Mike Johnson,
saying there were rumors that Johnson could soon recess the House until
after the midterm elections and asking whether the move would be
intended to 'avoid the vote'." We all remember the positions Johnson
put himself in to avoid the first discharge petition. This included
Johnson refusing to swear in Adelita Grijalva for fifty days
after her election because he knew the Democrat was going to immediately
sign the discharge petition. This included Johnson adjourning or
recessing the House, it included him attacking the bill (including
calling it partisan) and it included him proposing other measures.
It'll be interesting to see which stalling tactics Speaker of the Closet
Johnson might resort to.
Speaker Mike Johnson and the GOP have an even smaller House majority
now after Democratic Representative Everton Blair of Georgia was sworn in on Capitol Hill Tuesday.
Republicans
now have a 218–213 advantage over Democrats, and they’ll be down one
more vote once California Democrat Aisha Wahab—who replaced
scandal-ridden ex-Representative Eric Swalwell—is sworn in later this week.
So
214 once Aisha Wahab is sworn in later this week which means four
Republicans are needed to sign on to the discharge petition.
Chump? He's
resorting to anything and everything to try shore up midterms for the
GOP. This does involve scapegoating trans people. Devin Dwyer (ABC NEWS) reports
Chump is requesting the Supreme Court okay his immediate firing of 29
transgender service members despite the fact that they are awaiting
hearings on the ban:
The
justices will consider this fall whether to hear the case at this early
stage, before any final ruling on the merits by a lower court.
In
the meantime, the 29 plaintiffs – who are active-duty, reservists,
National Guard members and a person seeking to enlist – will remain in
the force.
"As the Trump administration’s own
attorneys admitted, these are qualified individuals who are meeting all
military standards," said Jennifer Levi, an attorney representing the
transgender service members with the LGBTQ legal advocacy group GLAD
Law. "There is no reason to waste millions of taxpayer dollars to kick
out thousands of highly trained, skilled and decorated troops based on
nothing but hostility and this administration’s political whims."
This move echoes Texas Governor Greg Abbott's
lies. In his commercial that's run everywhere (Sabina says most often
on PLUTO) he gives a one word sentence about how he has said NO boys in
girls sports because he's protecting girls.
Greg
claims he is all about protecting girls in sports. Really? Because Texas has a
problem coach. And Abbott has ignored this problem coach. Yesterday, Molly Hensley-Clancy (PROPUBLICA and WASHINGTON POST) reported that Homeland Security has picked up the case:
The
ProPublica and Post story detailed how Ryan Richardson continued to
coach teenage girls for years at his gym in Pharr, Texas, amid
allegations of misconduct, even after he was suspended in early 2025 and
subsequently ruled “permanently ineligible” this February by the U.S.
Center for SafeSport, an oversight group. On its public disciplinary list,
SafeSport said it found that Richardson had an intimate relationship
with a minor, committed sexual misconduct involving a minor, and engaged
in physical misconduct and bullying.
Juan J.
Flores Jr., a supervisor in a Homeland Security Investigations unit that
focuses on child exploitation in the Rio Grande Valley, told ProPublica
and The Post that he had launched the probe into Richardson in response
to the story, which included allegations from a parent and former
players that he had a sexual relationship with a 16-year-old player
beginning in 2022 and that he groomed and emotionally and physically
abused others.
“My plan is to turn over every rock, have every conversation. I know he’s still coaching,” Flores said.
That
was early 2025 when he was suspended. And Abbott did nothing. He's
still done nothing. He pretends he wants to protect girls.
Abbott
is not a protector of girls. And he has no leg to stand on when he
talks about girls and sports because he allowed the predator Ryan
Richardson to coach in Texas after being suspended in early 2025 for his
inappropriate action with girls.
President
Donald Trump's boast that cheaper gas is just around the corner after
his energy deal with Venezuela didn't last long at all.
According
to a report from The Washington Post, energy industry analysts and
experts in oil extraction are rolling their eyes at the president's
claim that "THE BIGGEST OIL DEAL IN WORLD HISTORY" would "substantially lower Gas Prices for all Americans."
That may be true in five years at best, experts fired back.
Not for at least a couple of years, if ever, many in the industry told the Washington Post — certainly not before voters cast ballots
in the fall midterms, and probably not before Trump leaves office.
That's because the billions of barrels of reserves the U.S. is seeking
access to through the deal are "notoriously difficult to extract."
"Everyone
cheering the Venezuela deal thinks a flood of cheap oil is about to hit
and pull gas prices down. It isn't," Tracy Shuchart, senior economist
at NinjaTrader, wrote on X. "The barrels that could actually move a U.S.
pump price are 5 to 15 years out."
Mark
Finley, a fellow in energy and global oil at Rice University's Baker
Institute, told the Post the "ramp-up" will be slow at best.
Chump lies and lies and lies again.
Fact
checking Chump is hard because there are days where every other
sentence he spits out is a lie. Aaron Blake (CNN) is someone who's
addressed Chump's lies for many years now. In his latest for CNN, he notes:
It
should surprise nobody that the president who tried to overturn the
2020 election based on lies — and didn’t seem to mind his supporters
rising up violently on January 6, 2021 — might try to monkey with the
2026 midterm elections.
It remains to be seen whether President Donald Trump’s efforts to interfere in the 2026 election will actually work.
But recent developments should serve as a reality check that he’s trying, with potentially ugly results.
While that might not sound shocking in and of itself, there is plenty about it that’s irregular.
The
effort involves using an arm of Immigration and Customs Enforcement
called Homeland Security Investigations, which typically handles other
crimes like human trafficking and drug smuggling.
But
mostly, the reason it should raise eyebrows is because of the proximity
to the 2026 election, now just a little more than two months away. As
CNN’s Priscilla Alvarez, Tierney Sneed and Gabe Cohen note, the federal
government typically avoids such “overt” investigatory actions so close
to an election. The reason is that mere allegations that haven’t been
thoroughly examined could influence the election.
But when it comes to Trump and alleged voter fraud, that’s a feature rather than a bug.
Trump
has spent a decade trying and failing to substantiate his claims of
widespread fraud. In his first term, he launched a voter fraud
commission that folded with little to show. His campaign paid people to find widespread fraud after the 2020 election, to no avail.
What the administration has produced of late is a lot of manufactured smoke.
That includes its bogus claim about 250,000 noncitizens being registered to vote in just four states. It also includes a highly unorthodox unsigned report
from the US Census Bureau last month claiming tens of thousands of
noncitizens voted in the 2020 presidential election. (Experts have
decried both claims.)
The DHS effort would seem to be geared toward promoting such claims, given the department’s purview.
But
if other efforts to find widespread voter fraud didn’t produce anything
substantive, the odds would appear slim that DHS will change that in
just two months.
Of course, producing ironclad
evidence of fraud probably isn’t the point. The Trump administration’s
goal appears to be seeding more doubt — and possibly even creating a
pretext for more federal intervention in the election (which we’ll get
to).
The other big development this week was an unnamed federal whistleblower issuing a major warning
about the Trump administration’s new system for verifying mail ballots.
The system has devolved into what workers describe as a “sh*t show”
that could lead to mass disenfranchisement of mail voters, the
whistleblower says
An
anonymous official with "direct knowledge" has come forward to warn
about "potentially catastrophic problems" with the government's proposed
takeover of the vote-by-mail system, according to a whistleblower complaint filed in federal court on Monday.
The official's concerns were documented on a docket in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia by plaintiffs in one of many lawsuits challenging the rule that would have the U.S. Postal Service (USPS) wrest control of mail-in voting away from the states.
The whistleblower claims the major problem with the Trump administration's
sea change is with the "secretive, rushed, chaotic, and fundamentally
flawed process for the creation and implementation of an entirely new
and untested set" of information technology systems.
These
systems are related to a so-called "Portal" envisioned by the USPS in
which state and local election officials are expected to input each and
every voter's information in order to receive a qualifying postal mail
ballot and to "adhere to…data reporting standards."
To
hear the whistleblower tell it, the government has simultaneously
rushed the "final rule" while spending little time on the systems needed
to administer the proposed national mail-in voter database.
"The
Whistleblower believes on or about June 2026 work began in earnest on
the USPS election ballot mail IT project, just three months (which
reportedly includes a one month period when work was paused) before the
date USPS is currently working toward to launch that system," the
original whistleblower letter dated Aug. 30 reads.
Democrats on the House Oversight Committee issued the following statement:
Washington, D.C. — Today, Rep. Robert Garcia,
Ranking Member of the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform,
released the following statement after a whistleblower revealed to the
Oversight Committee that the United States Postal Service allegedly
built a secret tech system to implement the Trump Administration’s
unconstitutional attempt to seize control of vote by mail across the
country.
“The Oversight Committee has received whistleblower
reports that President Trump's attack on vote-by-mail for the 2026
election is more serious than previously understood. This new secret
tracking system at the US Postal Service is faulty, untested, and
threatens to totally disrupt ballot delivery for millions of American
citizens. We are fighting in court to protect the right to vote by mail
for all and will continue to investigate. This unconstitutional and
dangerous power grab must be permanently and immediately blocked,” said Ranking Member Robert Garcia.
Army
Secretary Dan Driscoll has become the latest high-ranking U.S. military
official to leave the Pentagon amid reports of tensions with Secretary
Pete Hegseth.
No official reason has been
offered for Driscoll’s departure following 18 months in the role but it
comes after CNN and Reuters said he had been butting heads with Hegseth
for several months.
According to sources cited
by The Atlantic, Driscoll recently “brought up concerns with the
administration surrounding Army transformation and readiness and
Hegseth’s blocking those efforts specifically by firing the generals who
were responsible.” His mission was seemingly unsuccessful.
Nevertheless,
President Donald Trump was said to be “surprised and concerned” about
the number of the cuts to the department and the seniority of those who
have left, The Atlantic reports. The department now has fewer generals
than any point in recent history, the outlet adds.
While
President Trump and his self-styled secretary of state for “War”, Pete
Hegseth, dismissed it as ‘fake news’, by all accounts, life for the
5,000 men and women on board the USS Abraham Lincoln had become a living
nightmare after more than 260 days at sea without respite.
The
nuclear-powered warship left San Diego in November and has, until
recently, been stationed in the Middle East to support the U.S. war
against Iran. While the Lincoln left the Middle East on August 22 on its
way home, with a planned Thailand stop, she has spent a record amount
of time at sea without a port visit. Stories abound about poor food, bad
hygiene, blocked toilets, intermittent showers, plummeting morale and
shredded mental health. Reports in the Military Times and the Stars and
Stripes claimed that sailors even tried to jump overboard as the
deployment kept going.
Despite
the official denials, including Trump’s tetchy assertion to White House
reporters that the deployment ‘should have been longer!’, the number of
accounts from families of those on board are persuasive. An emergency
town hall meeting in San Diego, earlier this month, attended by roughly
200 families, saw many desperate relatives confronting Navy leadership
over the prolonged deployment and worsening conditions. During the
meeting, the wife of one sailor aired her tearful grievance: “They’re
trapped in a metal prison in the middle of the ocean. They eat
prison-like food and sleep in tiny, cramped beds just like prisoners.”
In
an official statement, acting navy secretary Hung Cao confirmed the
ship had completed 266 days deployed, 200 days in a combat zone and more
than 10,000 sorties, and acknowledged that the sailors had been pushed
very hard. “There is no question our young men and women have been
pushed to their limits – but they have never been broken,” said Cao.
“However, it is clear, knowing the whole story, our force and their
families are not victims. They are the epitome of American strength and
resilience.”
He
is a hateful, little boy trying to ass himself off as a man. But grown
men do not mock children. And he's such a piece of trash that he's now
taken to publicly mocking children. Dexter Brinson (MOUNT OLIVE CHRONICLE) notes:
Defense
Secretary Pete Hegseth is under fire for a recent social media post
mocking a Canadian youth cadet instructor’s appearance, drawing
widespread condemnation amid a growing leadership crisis at the
Pentagon. The controversy comes as top officials continue to resign and
internal conflicts threaten the stability of the U.S. Department of
Defense under Hegseth’s tenure in 2026.
On
Monday, Hegseth shared a photo originally posted by the Vernon Cadet
Training Center in British Columbia, which depicts a smiling cadet
receiving a medal. The Canadian facility is a youth program for ages 12
to 18 that teaches military-style leadership and drills under the
Department of National Defense. However, Hegseth singled out one image,
added a Canadian flag, and captioned it with the dismissive remark,
“(this is real),” seemingly mocking the cadet’s physical appearance.
The
post quickly drew backlash from veterans, military supporters, and
social media users who criticized the Defense Secretary for body-shaming
a volunteer-led youth group rather than focusing on his
responsibilities. A Canadian veteran remarked, “The Secretary of Defense
is body shaming cadet groups. This is a youth group, not a military
unit. They are kids seeking adventure and service values.” Others
questioned the appropriateness of Hegseth’s comments during a time of
ongoing conflict, labeling the attack as “unhinged” and “embarrassing.”
Let's wind down with this from Senator Patty Murray's office:
Port Townsend, WA – Today, U.S. Senator Patty Murray
(D-WA), a senior member and former chair of the Senate Committee on
Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP), toured Jefferson
Healthcare and discussed the new challenges health care providers are
facing over a year after Republicans passed the largest health care cuts
in history in their Big Ugly Bill. Throughout the tour, Senator Murray
heard from providers about the impact of the Republicans’ cuts to
Medicaid and their failure to extend the Affordable Care Act (ACA) tax
credits—causing massive premium hikes for families in Washington state.
The Republican reconciliation bill, which was signed into law in July 2025, cut more than $1 trillion from
Medicaid and the ACA over the next 10 years and will make health care
more expensive and harder to access. The nonpartisan Congressional
Budget Office (CBO) estimates that Republicans’ health care cuts will
terminate health insurance for roughly 15 million Americans nationwide.
“Republicans passed the largest cuts to health care in
history and have singlehandedly created a national health care crisis.
Meanwhile, providers are left to wonder how they will keep their staff
paid and their doors open,” said Senator Murray.
“Providers are doing incredible work, but they’re being asked to do a
more with a whole lot less. If that weren’t damaging enough, Republicans
refused to extend the health care tax credits—which millions of people
relied on to afford health coverage. The fallout from that has been
devastating. Families saw their premiums double, triple, or even worse.
When families in Jefferson County can’t afford coverage, they don’t get
less sick—they just end up in emergency rooms where hospitals eat the
cost and everyone else foots the bill. Congress needs to repeal Trump’s
cuts to health care—getting there won’t be easy, but we must fight hard
and make sure all Americans understand the harm these cuts are doing.”
ABOUT TRUMP’S MEDICAID CUTS:
Nationwide, the Republican health care cuts represent a more than $400 billion hit to America’s hospitals—with one estimate finding that over 170 rural hospitals will
likely be forced to close or scale back their services, which will
force more Americans to travel further for maternity care and emergency
room visits, and face longer wait times. Washington state is one of the
states most at-risk, with 22 hospitals at-risk of closing or reducing services. An estimated 477,000 health workers will lose their jobs as a result of the Republican cuts to Medicaid. Senator Murray has consistently advocated for rural health care access across the state, hosting numerousevents to emphasize the importance of investment into rural communities.
Hospitals in Washington state could lose at least $662 million in
Medicaid revenue every year under the One Big Beautiful Act
(OBBBA)—forcing hospitals to lay off staff, cut services, or close their
doors entirely. Overall, Washington state is expected to lose between
$31 billion and $51 billion in federal Medicaid dollars over the next
decade. In 2024, Washington had an uninsured rate of 4.8 percent—the
lowest in the country—but the Republican bill is expected to balloon
that number into the double digits.
In Washington state, nearly 2 million people—roughly 1 in 5—are enrolled in Apple Health, the state’s Medicaid program. Washington’s 4th Congressional District has the highest Medicaid enrollment in Washington state, with nearly 300,000 people—38 percent of all residents—reliant on Apple Health, including 70 percent of all children in the state.
ABOUT GOP REFUSAL TO EXTEND ACA TAX CREDITS:
Senator Murray forced the issue of the ACA tax credits at every
opportunity before Republicans ultimately refused to take any action, speakingoutnonstop about the urgent need to save health care and calling on Republicans
to come to the negotiating table to work out a bipartisan deal to
extend the ACA tax credits. She took to the Senate floor in November
2025 with her Democratic colleagues to call for a clean one-year extension of the ACA tax credits, and held numerous virtualpressconferences with Washingtonians, as well as residents of neighboring states Idaho and Montana,
about the exploding health care premiums that Americans would see due
to the expiration of the tax credits. As the top Democrat on the Senate
Appropriations Committee, Senator Murray led legislation supported
by the Democratic caucus that would have addressed the health care
crisis during the government shutdown last fall. Senator Murray has also
cosponsored multiple pieces of legislation over the past year—the Health Care Affordability Act and the Protecting Health Care and Lowering Costs Act—that would make the ACA tax credits permanent.
As then-chair of the Senate Health Committee, Senator Murray played a
critical role in passing the ACA enhanced premium tax credits into law
in the American Rescue Plan Act in 2021 and extending them in
the Inflation Reduction Act in 2022.
Now
let's note Cory Mills. We've noted him off and on for about two years
now. He lost his primary last month -- despite being the incumbent.
He's now gone into hiding. Erik De La Garza (RAW STORY) reports:
Concern
had grown among people close to Mills’ staff over his whereabouts and
lack of communication after his defeat in Florida’s Republican primary,
the Daily Mail reported.
“Staffers
admit it is not unusual for Mills to go 'MIA,' but sources say his team
are surprised by his lack of communication, failing to even make any
public statement after his defeat and missing work obligations,” the
report said.
It added that Mills keeps a
campaign bus that he has been known to sleep in, making it more
difficult for aides to track him down.
“He genuinely did not see himself losing this primary,” one source told the outlet.
Following
his defeat, Mills spent the day at the beach house with Catherine
Chils, who is described as the Republican’s longtime companion. She
denied being at the property that day and said the two are just friends.
But
Mills’ absence could also create problems for House Republicans, who
hold a razor-thin majority and are facing a September deadline to keep
the government funded.
“A bitter Mills, snubbed by Donald Trump and rejected by his own party, has little incentive to show up and lend his vote," the Daily Mail said.
The
two-term congressman, the subject of a House ethics investigation, lost
his primary to a conservative news anchor by 14 points. While Trump
endorsed Mills, the president left him off a list of Florida Republicans
he supported on the night before Election Day, according to the
publication.
He's gone off with his latest girlfriend to lick his wounds. Boo hoo, Cory, Boo Hoo.
Vice
President JD Vance is under fire for his insensitive word choice while
speaking about the upcoming 25th anniversary of the 9/11 terror attacks.
The incident unfolded Monday at a GOP rally in Sterling Heights, Michigan, to promote candidates
that President Donald Trump endorsed in the November midterms. The
event was centered around two key races, including the governor's race
and a Senate race. Both of the Trump-endorsed candidates, including
Republican Rep. John James, who is running for governor; and Republican
Senator Mike Rogers, who is competing against progressive powerhouse
Abdul El-Sayed for a Senate seat, spoke at the event, which was
organized by the Make America Great Again Super PAC, according to WDIV Local 4.
When
the vice president gave remarks, he mentioned the upcoming milestone
anniversary of the deadliest terrorist attack in history that rocked the
nation over 25 years ago.
On
Sept. 11, 2001, Al-Qaeda-linked terrorists flew planes into the Twin
Towers and the World Trade Center, killing 2,977 people, including 343
firefighters and 72 law enforcement personnel, while injuring thousands
more. Decades later, many survivors of the horrific attacks have
continued to develop and suffer from long-term health consequences.
While
speaking about the traumatic moment in U.S. history, Vance seemingly
slipped up and selected a poor choice of words to describe the upcoming
anniversary.
"We're about to celebrate the 25th
year, or... commemorate the 25th year, of those terrible terrorist
attacks, and celebrate all those brave heroes who made it; frankly, as
terrible as it was, it could've been so much worse."
Celebrate? Celebrate? How much of an idiot is JD? Miss Sassy needs to buy a clue. Some comments on the article:
Dan Ross
13 hours ago
And
Vance is the top contender right now for the GOP in 2028? Vance
repeatedly has opened his mouth and stuck his foot in it. How sad the
choices are so limited.
Red Rover
4 hours ago
Huge
difference between celebrate and commemorate. And how many people
didn't catch it because they don't know the difference anyway? Waiting
for the maga excuses, though don't bother, its inexcusable.
Dream Mine
40 minutes ago
This
clown is clearly not clear on what happened to America on that dreadful
day. For those of us here in NY state we remember the second it
started. We remember our local ambulance and fire departments rushing
down to the city to help in any way possible. We collected water and
food and regular citizens took it down by the pickup truck load. We
pitched in with anything we could do. We felt this crippling terror
attack for what it was to our state, to our city and to America. We
lost friends and loved ones and watched on our TV's as people ran by
foot to get out of the danger zone, as our first responders ran into the
danger zone. But this guys wants to be our next leader......I don't
think so you have not one clue as to what 9/11 means to NY and NYC.
Vice
President JD Vance sharply criticized Abdul El-Sayed at an Aug. 31
rally in Michigan, calling the Democratic U.S. Senate candidate "very,
very evil" and urging him to "keep my wife's name the hell out of your
mouth."
Vance made the remarks during a speech
at an event in Sterling Heights, Michigan, hosted by MAGA Inc., a super
PAC aligned with President Donald Trump. GOP nominee Mike Rogers, who is
facing El-Sayed in November, also spoke at the rally.
It
comes weeks after El-Sayed, a progressive public health official,
secured the Democratic nomination for Senate in Michigan in one of the
most crucial races of the 2026 election season.
[. . .]
The dispute also took a personal turn as the vice president condemned El-Sayed for comments about second lady Usha Vance.
"Whatever
you want to talk about, Abdul, keep my wife's name the hell out of your
mouth because she's way out of your league," Vance said at the rally.
Earlier
in August, El-Sayed responded to a clip on X of Vance referencing his
late grandfather as he spoke about the Democratic candidate. In the
clip, Vance alleges El-Sayed supports implementing Islamic religious law
in the United States, but, according to Reuters, the comments distort a
2022 video of El-Sayed discussing a ballot proposal in Oklahoma.
"I'd
love to go back in time and tell my Papaw that there is a man who
claims to stand for working people, who says not only should we have
Sharia law, but if you criticize it, you are a white supremacist," Vance
said.
El-Sayed responded to the clip by writing, "So do we think JD is taking Usha with him back in time to meet Papaw, or no…"
First,
El-Sayed didn't say anything rude about Usha. Second, Usha is a public
figure and anyone can say whatever they want to about her. Third,
Usha's probably the most liked member of this administration by those of
us on the left. When JD was all over Erica Kirk, we weren't laughing at
Usha, we were calling out the trashy behavior of JD and Erica. Usha's
the only one in the administration who seems like a real person and
someone who cares. So, JD, grasp that it's only in your mind that your
opponents are trashing your wife. Most of us, your opponents, think
Usha's an alright person.
Tuesday, September 1, 2026. Chump keeps pimping unpopular data centers,
his own popularity numbers remain in the toilet, Pete Hegseth remains
an unqualified Secretary of Defense, and much more.
Chump's happy talkers keep preaching a rebound in his popularity. But so far I'm not seeing it. In fact, REUTERS reported late yesterday:
President
Donald Trump's approval rating was stuck at the lowest level of his
political career amid broad dissatisfaction over the war in Iran and the
Republican's economic stewardship, according to a Reuters/Ipsos poll
that concluded on Monday.
Just 33% of Americans
approve of the job Trump is doing in the White House - the third
straight Reuters/Ipsos poll with that share of respondents giving the
president a thumbs up.
Trump's political brand
looks increasingly like a potential weight on his Republican Party,
which will be defending slim congressional majorities in the November 3
midterm elections.
An
eye-opening new poll has shown that President Donald Trump’s approval
rating has dropped to its lowest level in either of his two terms, as a
growing number of past supporters say they wouldn’t vote for him again.
The UMass-Amherst survey
of 1,000 people, conducted between August 21 and 26, found growing
dissatisfaction with the president, due mostly to the ongoing war in
Iran and financial pain at the gas pump and grocery checkout. The margin
of error in the poll was 3.5%.
“With no end in
sight to the ongoing war in Iran, the continued rise in the price of
gas, groceries, utilities, and housing, an escalating trade war with Canada,
and the likelihood of higher interest rates, it comes as no surprise
that Trump’s approval rating remains at a paltry 32%, a
1-percentage-point drop since we last polled in March 2026,” Tatishe
Nteta, poll director and provost professor of political science at UMass
Amherst, said in a statement.
The poll also
noted growing regret among those who cast a ballot for Trump in the 2024
election, with about 16 percent of respondents saying they wouldn’t
back him again if they could do it all over again.
Republican
senators are increasingly convinced the battle for Senate control will
be decided in the Midwest, and that agricultural voters angered by
tariffs, fuel costs and beef imports could hand Democrats the majority.
Democrats
need a net gain of four seats to flip the chamber, and strategists say
that becomes attainable if they capture Republican-held seats in Ohio
and Iowa while holding Michigan, then find a fourth seat in North
Carolina or a longer-shot state, reported Politico.
"He's
in serious trouble in farm country," Sen. Kevin Cramer (R-ND) said of
President Donald Trump. "He being Trump — and Trump is us. I'm not very
optimistic."
Farm-state Republicans point to a
combination of tariffs, expensive diesel and fertilizer, and
administration moves to ease tariffs on imported beef as driving
frustration among agricultural voters who have historically backed the
party.
The
war has cost the U.S. tens of billions of dollars and reduced projected
global output by hundreds of billions, according to the Fortune report.
At the same time, businesses and investments connected to President
Donald Trump’s family have benefited from higher defense spending and
oil prices.
Military contractor Powerus, which
Eric Trump and Donald Trump Jr. were preparing to take public, won an
Air Force contract with a ceiling of up to $90 million for drone
interceptors.
Private equity firm 1789 Capital
Management, which Don Jr. joined after his father’s reelection, owns
stakes in several defense companies benefiting from the war. Anduril
received U.S. approval for up to $2 billion in drone-interceptor sales
to Kuwait, while Space Exploration Technologies Corp. SPCX is providing
satellite services to guide U.S. drones against Iran. Firehawk Defense
also won Pentagon contracts for propellants and warheads.
A spokeswoman for 1789 Capital said Don Jr. was not involved in the investment decisions.
Trump’s
own portfolio, managed by outside managers, has also gained from
holdings in defense companies including Lockheed Martin Corp. LMT,
General Dynamics Corporation GD and Northrop Grumman Corp. NOC.
Democrats said his oil and gas holdings had increased in value by as
much as $15.5 million.
The estimate came as Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) pointed to Trump’s reported holdings
in ExxonMobil Holdings Corp XOM, Chevron Corp CVX, Occidental Petroleum
Corp OXY and ConocoPhillips COP, whose shares had gained significantly
since the start of the year, according to a Senate Joint Economic
Committee Democrats’ analysis.
American
consumers have kept the economy afloat for years, even as inflation,
high borrowing costs and rising grocery bills squeeze household budgets.
But some of the country’s biggest corporate leaders are warning that
shoppers may be hitting a breaking point.
Kraft Heinz CEO Steve Cahillane offered one of the bluntest assessments of the financial strain facing lower-income consumers.
“They’re
literally running out of money at the end of the month,” Cahillane said
in a May 2026 interview (1). “We’re seeing negative cash flows in the
lower-income brackets where they’re dipping into savings.”
The
company behind brands like Heinz, Kraft and Philadelphia is now cutting
prices (2) on some products that have grown too expensive, increasing
promotions and rolling out smaller package sizes at lower price points.
Cahillane
added that the industry has endured years of “volume degradation”
because consumers had to absorb “too much price.” He also warned that
another round of price increases could put more pressure on
already-stretched household budgets.
“We could see more significant inflation and nobody wants to see that,” he said.
Cahillane isn’t the only CEO sounding the alarm.
McDonald’s
CEO Chris Kempczinski has flagged pressure on consumers, pointing to
“heightened anxiety (3).” The company’s CFO Ian Borden also noted that
higher gas prices are hitting lower-income households especially hard,
saying the company was seeing those consumers pull back on spending,
while higher-income customers remained much more resilient.
Elsewhere,
Whirlpool CEO Marc Bitzer has described a sharp pullback in demand for
big-ticket appliances, while North America executive president, Juan
Carlos Puente, has pointed to “recession-level industry contractions,”
with discretionary demand down roughly 15% (4).
Pete Hegseth, the unqualified Secretary of
Defense who only got into the position thanks to JD Vance's tie
breaking vote in the Senate. It was the narrowest vote for a Secretary
of Defense ever. And that's because (a) Hegseth wasn't qualified
because being a weekend talking head on FOX "NEWS" doesn't make you
qualified, (b) Hegseth had never supervised a department or anything as
large as the Defense Dept and the minor organizations he had been in
charge of all had money problems with some people pointing to him as the
problem, (c) he was considered a sexist and he also had forced a woman
to sign an NDA that he would not release her from to allow her to
testify at his confirmation hearing, (d) he had a drinking problem and
had to assure the senators that he wouldn't drink booze if he was
confirmed and . . .
He
wasn't qualified. The whole country sees that now and sees how badly
things go when you put an unqualified nominee into an office.
Now
some people with no experience for the job would be eager to hear input
and utilize the intelligence of others. But Hegseth has no respect for
intelligence. Hence Joseph Gedeon (INDEPENDENT) reports:
Pete
Hegseth regularly receives formal objections from senior commanders and
proceeds anyway, the Pentagon’s top spokesman has said, as he tried to
discredit a Washington Post report that four generals and admirals had
advised against prolonging the war in Iran.
“Of
course, we demand candid military advice,” Sean Parnell wrote on X,
formerly Twitter. “Non-concurs are standard. The Secretary sees them
constantly. That’s how you run a real military.”
Shortly
after the article’s publication, Defense Department spokesperson Sean
Parnell falsely claimed on social media that the publication of the
report was not only wrong, but also illegal.
“Publishing
highly classified assessments from the Secretary’s orders book is a
crime. It’s a betrayal of the force,” Parnell wrote. “And much of what
they’re publishing is inaccurate.”
Fact check:
While it’s against the law for government employees to leak sensitive or
classified government details, the Supreme Court ruled in 1971 that the
press’s ability to publicize that information is protected under the
First Amendment. That was the outcome of New York Times Co. v. United
States, which pitted the daily newspaper against the Nixon
administration after it published a top-secret history of the Vietnam
War known as the Pentagon Papers.
As Elaine noted last night, one of the problems with our government is
people like Parnell who try to cite the law without actually knowing the
law. That kind of makes him the perfect spokesperson for Hegseth --
they bond over their ignorance. Peter Suciu (NATIONAL INTEREST) notes:
Tensions are running high at the Pentagon on Monday, following a scathing report
from The Washington Post on Saturday that Secretary of Defense Pete
Hegseth was warned by multiple combatant commanders that the ongoing war with Iran is unsustainable, and that if it continues, it will weaken the US military’s ability to address other threats.
Military
leaders warned in the August 14 edition of the classified Secretary of
Defense Orders Book (SDOB) that extending deployments in the Middle East
could compromise global readiness and even homeland defense, the paper
of record reported.
The SDOB contained
classified assessments from the commanders tasked with overseeing US
areas of responsibility in Europe, Africa, Asia, and Latin America.
Those generals expressed opposition to an extended deployment of US
military forces in the Middle East. They warned that diverted warships—notably aircraft carriers—and
aircraft have degraded abilities elsewhere. According to an assessment
from the Chief of Naval Operations Adm. Daryl Caudle, only a quarter of
the US Navy’s destroyer fleet is currently prepared to deploy. That is a
sharp decline from the prewar levels.
The conflict, which is now in its sixth month, has cost $37.5 billion to date.
Army Secretary Daniel P. Driscoll, the
service’s top civilian leader, who clashed repeatedly with Defense
Secretary Pete Hegseth over the ouster of key combat-tested Army
leaders, handed in his resignation to President Trump on Monday,
administration officials said.
Mr.
Driscoll’s resignation was expected but it comes at a tumultuous time,
as the military’s largest service faces its busiest period since the
Iraq and Afghanistan wars. Army air defense soldiers are playing the
leading role in defending U.S. troops in the Middle East from
increasingly sophisticated Iranian missile attacks. The Army’s command
in Europe is providing critical intelligence and other support to
Ukraine as it fights to hold off a larger Russian force.
And Mr. Hegseth has in the meantime initiated a series of firings and feuds that has left the Army essentially rudderless
as it struggles to deal with the threat posed by cheap, deadly drones
and missiles that have pounded U.S. bases in the Middle East.
Mr.
Driscoll met with Mr. Trump in person to hand in his resignation and
discuss the current state of the Army, said one official, who like
others in this story spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss
personnel issues.
Multiple
White House insiders have named the same Trump Cabinet member they
believe will become the administration's first “midterm political
casualty" and predicted the official will be fired before Thanksgiving,
former Obama campaign aide Christopher Hale claimed Sunday night.
“Everyone
I talk to in and around the Trump White House says [Defense Secretary
Pete] Hegseth will be the first midterm political casualty and will be
fired before Thanksgiving,” Hale wrote in a statement shared on social
media.
Over the weekend, the big news was that Chump was no longer depending upon Hegseth the way he once did. Thomas Kika notes that this all has been a failure for Chump:
President
Donald Trump's botched handling of the Iran war has done "irreparable
damage" to his standing among voters, one veteran defense expert wrote for The i Paper, and the full extent will become clear after the midterms.
Robert
Fox is a long-time journalist and war correspondent with a career
dating back to the late 1960s, with experience covering conflicts in
places like Afghanistan, Iraq, the Falklands and many more. On Monday,
he published a new column for The i Paper breaking down why Trump's
"credibility is in tatters" as his war with Iran has left the U.S. military near its "breaking point."
"The
war, which was intended to last six weeks at most, has now run for more
than six months. To say there is no credible peace settlement in sight
might qualify as the understatement of the year," Fox wrote, citing the
recent U.S. strikes on Iran's Larak Island as a sign that the conflict
has fully ramped up after beleaguered peace talks.
He
added later: "The latest exchange of fire means that there is little
chance of meaningful peace talks before the U.S. midterm elections in
early November, and Israel’s general election on 27 October. It means
rising prices on the international energy markets and at the petrol
pumps for U.S. voters."
Pete Hegseth’s tenure
as defense secretary has been marked by leaked Signal chats, radical
religion, and a war on wokeness. But it’s his wife who has officials
concerned.
Across Donald Trump’s administration
and the Pentagon, concerns are spilling out over Jennifer Hegseth’s
influence on her husband—and on a department with an annual budget
larger than countries with the world’s largest economies.
“Jennifer
Hegseth is a very heavy hand and one of his closest advisers with
access inside the building, which is very unusual for a secretary of
war/secretary of defence,” one official told the Times of London on Monday.
Long
before the president announced that he had appointed Jennifer, 49, to
lead his Military Spouse Commission, the former Fox News producer’s
influence over her husband, 46, was known.
In
March 2025, Pete was caught revealing details about forthcoming strikes
on Yemen to his wife in a Signal group chat. Before being appointed, he
credited positive changes in his life to “two Js”: Jennifer and Jesus.
Just last month, more than 20 former and current DOD officials told The
New York Times that Jennifer was a key part of her husband’s
decision-making process.
In addition to sitting
in meetings with reporters and preparing Hegseth for appearances, his
wife has reportedly interviewed candidates for jobs at the Defense
Department. As she serves out her unofficial role, Jennifer is a
full-time mother for the child she shares with Pete and her six other
stepchildren, some of whom she homeschools.
Turning
to data centers. They are unpopular and opposition to them only
continues to grow. Out of touch and out of step Chump fails to realize
that. Luke Broadwater (NEW YORK TIMES) notes Chump's declarations yesterday:
President Trump on Monday lashed out at
communities that are protesting data centers, suggesting that residents
who do not go along with the artificial intelligence revolution must
prefer to be “backwards and poor.”
“The
only reason that communities throughout the U.S.A. should not want Data
Centers is if they want to end up being backwards and poor,” Mr. Trump
posted on his Truth Social site. “If they want to be successful and
rich, with far lower taxes and jobs all over the place, let Data Reign.”
Polling shows most Americans oppose
the proliferation of data centers in their communities, a signal of
worries about a quickly changing economy and the loss of jobs to
machines. Residents have also cited potential negative effects on the
environment and increased utility costs as reasons to oppose data
centers.
Yet Cump continues to be on the wrong side of this issue. As Ruth noted last night, "Mr.
Chump has lost his gift for speaking to the people. He has nothing to
connect with them on anymore. The dementia has taken hold. " Ryan Grenoble (HUFFINGTON POST) notes:
In
related news, officials in El Reno, Okla., say a damaged private water
line at a data center there wasted more than 3 million gallons of water
before it was discovered late last week. According to KOCO News, the business in question specializes in AI storage and Bitcoin mining.
The
leak forced El Reno schools and the county courthouse to temporarily
close, and forced thousands of residents to go without water, KFOR reported, after levels in El Reno’s water towers unexpectedly plummeted.
Despite
efforts to tout AI infrastructure as a boon to the American economy, as
well as a home-field advantage to a country steeped in capitalistic
aspiration, hawkers of this technology have failed to convince 70% of Americans
that AI and its data centers are anything other than a hostile
intrusion. To the public, they are monoliths that pollute the
environment, drive up energy costs, strip people of their livelihoods
and degrade the meaning of art.
But the catch for some politicians is that supporting AI is an
immensely profitable enterprise, even if the money and favors come from
just a few very powerful, very rich people. Oh, what are they to do?
Some
of them, like David Crowley, Wisconsin’s Democratic candidate for
governor, have wisely and belatedly eschewed “turn[ing] Wisconsin into
an AI and data hub . . . for the entire globe” as a talking point in
favor of convincing voters that local elected boards are the vanguard of
communal protection and direct democracy. Attempting to shrug off the
perception of being too pro-AI, Crowley told supporters
shortly after his primary win in August that “Local communities should
be the end all be all when it comes down to data centers. They should be
able to make the decision when it comes to data centers and if they
don’t want a data center, they should not be forced to have a data
center, and there’s no ands, ifs, or buts about that.”
When
Tom Tiffany, Crowley’s Republican opponent, has managed to take breaths
between his incessant attacks on “Data Center David,” he has also clarified his own position in favor of “local input” and “local control” — even though he previously voted in favor of federal bills to expedite the construction of data centers and ban state and local AI regulations.
Significantly,
neither candidate’s Paul-on-the-road-to-Madison conversion includes
support for a temporary moratorium on data center construction — a cause
with especially strong support from the left
and elected officials like Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., and Rep.
Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., as well as Dr. Abdul El-Sayed, the
Democratic nominee for U.S. Senate in neighboring Michigan. The logic
behind that push — buying time to evaluate the extent of data center
effects and find a more permanent solution — is a direct answer to
damage that has already been inflicted and to what polls have indicated
as sweeping, bipartisan opposition
to their further construction. Proposals to offload data center
permitting, on the other hand, use the vocabulary of democracy and
autonomy to hide the fact that “local communities,” in practice, means
local governments, which are structurally overmatched, underfunded and
vulnerable to the pressure tactics of trillion-dollar technology
monopolies.
Let's wind down with this from Senator Tammy Duckworth's office:
[MARION, IL] – U.S. Senator Tammy Duckworth (D-IL) and U.S. Senate
Democratic Whip Dick Durbin (D-IL) today held a roundtable with Illinois
health care providers, leaders and advocates to discuss the challenges
they’re facing in providing care to rural communities as a direct result
of the Trump Administration’s harmful health care cuts. Since being
signed into law last July, President Trump’s One Big Beautiful Bill
made the largest health care cuts in history, destabilizing the health
care system with more than $1 trillion in cuts from Medicaid and the Patient Protection andAffordable Care Act. Photos from the roundtable can be found on Senator Duckworth’s website.
“For many Illinoisans in rural communities, health care was
already too expensive and too hard to get—and then came the Medicaid
cuts,” Duckworth said. “Slashing Medicaid has not only
put reliable health care coverage at even more risk for hundreds of
thousands of Illinoisans but also added even more pressure on rural
hospitals already struggling to keep their doors open. The Administration’s
cuts will only make it harder for families to get care close to home
when mere minutes can be life-saving—or stop access altogether. Senator
Durbin and I will keep fighting to protect Medicaid, support our rural
health care services and make sure every Illinoisan can get the care
they need when they need it, no matter their zip code.”
“Senator Duckworth and I sent letters to Illinois hospitals last year and asked them how the so-called One Big Beautiful Bill Act
and its devastating Medicaid cuts would impact their hospital, health
care workforce, and the patients they serve,” Durbin said.
“The 129 responses we received made it clear that this legislation will
mean shuttering of services, layoffs, and even hospital
closures—meaning patients will needlessly suffer. If you look at the
numbers, 24 rural hospitals are at risk of closure in Illinois. I think
we ought to make a commitment to rural hospitals and families struggling
with the cost-of-living instead of slashing federal funding for health
care in order to fund tax cuts for billionaires.”
The consequences of these policies will continue to be felt across
our state, with an estimated 400,000 Illinoisans expected to lose health
coverage by 2034. Illinois nursing homes and hospitals, primarily in
rural areas, are at risk of closing and Medicaid cuts are predicted to result in more than 27,000 jobs cut across the state.
Yesterday, Duckworth hosted a women’s health care roundtable with
local reproductive health clinics, obstetrics providers, federally
qualified health centers and health departments to hear about the
difficulties of providing reproductive and maternal care in rural
Southern Illinois, where Carbondale has become a safe haven for women
seeking care from across the region and surrounding states, and the
impact of Trump Administration policies on access to care. Photos from
the women’s health care roundtable can be found on Senator Duckworth’s website.