While The Goldbergs season
10 successfully covered up Jeff Garlin’s exit by killing off Murray,
this hasn’t fixed the biggest problem with the nostalgic family sitcom.
One major problem with setting shows during a nostalgic period in the
past is that, the longer the show is on the air, the weirder it will be
for time to remain still in-universe. For example, Stranger Things can’t
have 11 seasons set during the 80s if each season takes place over a
full year, since that would require over a full decade of in-universe
Similarly, while The Goldbergs is pointedly set in “1980-something” to avoid this issue, that excuse won’t work forever. While The Goldbergs handled Jeff Garlin’s exit poorly at
first, season 10 of the series managed to fix this problem by promptly
killing off the character off-screen. However, there is a bigger issue
with The Goldbergs season 10.
When The Goldbergs debuted back in 2013, it was the story of 11-year-old Adam Goldberg and his teenage siblings Erica and Barry. By 2022, The Goldbergs season 10 Christmas episode focused
on the now twenty-something Erica and Barry and the twenty-year-old
Adam. It is believable that Adam would live with his mother rather than
attend college, particularly after the sudden loss of his father, and
Dave Kim does say that Adam is taking a “gap year” in The Goldbergs season 10, episode 6, “DKNY.” However, Barry and Erica’s constant presence in the family home is harder to justify.
It goes on and on like this without ever getting to the problem: Adam has to grow up.
The writer also makes a lot of mistakes like:
When The Goldbergs debuted back in 2013, it was the story of 11-year-old Adam Goldberg and his teenage siblings Erica and Barry. By 2022, The Goldbergs season 10 Christmas episode focused on the now twenty-something Erica and Barry and the twenty-year-old Adam.
I wish Adam was 20. He just graduated high school last spring.
The show did address this in The Goldbergs season
10, episode 4, “Man of the House,” wherein Erica managed to graduate
college but Erica and Geoff were too distracted by her pregnancy to
Erica noticed her own graduation. It was Bev and Geoff who didn't.
There's so much work that THE GOLDBERGS need to do. It's a shame that SCREEN RANT couldn't grasp that and couldn't get their facts right on the claims they tried to put forward.
Thursday, December 15, 2022. The House Oversight and Reform Committee held a hearing on violence against LGBTQ+ members.
We'll start with this.
Anderson: I was bartending that evening when the attack began. I felt
more terrified than I ever have before. I ran for my life that night
and hid -- praying and hoping the violence would end. When I stared
down the barrel of that gun, I realized I stood no chance against a
weapon of that power, magazine capacity, and seemingly automatic firing
rate. While I prepared for my life to end in that moment, I prayed. I
panicked. And I prayed some more. God must have heard my prayers
because two brave men stopped the shooter moments before he would have
inevitably found me. I saw my friend lying on the floor, bleeding out,
knowing there was little to no chance of surviving the bullet wound. I
had to tell him goodbye while I continued to fear for my life, not
knowing if the attack was truly over.
Slaugh: The events of November 19th were a nightmare come true. Right
before midnight, on the eve of Transgender Day of Remembrance, my
boyfriend Jancarlos and I were about to leave when a shooter walked in.
Several POPs rang out and I immediately felt a searing pain in my arm.
I fell over knowing I had been shot. My right arm wasn't working but I
was able to call 911. I saw everyone on the ground, glass panes
shattered and blood running from my arm and chest where shrapnel had
come through. Jancarlos was next to me, shot in the leg, but thankfully
alive. To my horror though, I saw my sister bleeding out. She had
been shot over five times. My heart rended ed as she tried to dial 911
with her good arm. I called out to her and I heard no response. I
don't want to imagine what may have happened had the shooter not been
taken down. Five wonderful people were still murdered and may we never
forget their names
Haynes: When I opened Club Q twenty years ago, Colorado Springs was a
very different place. There were picketers greeting our opening. I'm
proud to have remained in Colorado Springs over the years -- even when
we did not feel welcome. Club ! has been a home for the community for
20 years. We are proud to say it will once again become the home for
our community. One man full of hate will not destroy us. Club Q is for
everyone regardless of who they love and how they present, regardless
if this is different than how you or I may love. LGBTQ venues and small
business across our nation are extensions of family for us all. And,
for many, they are the only places we can find acceptance. Club Q will
need all the resources available to help us rebuild what was stolen from
James and Matthew survived last month's shooting at Club Q. The three
were testifying before The House Committee on Oversight and Reform. US
House Rep Carolyn Maloney is the Chair of the Committee.
leaves Congress next month. She was first sworn in in January of
1993. She used her last weeks in Congress to focus on a very important
issue -- at least important to most people. It wasn't important to any
Republican on the Committee and I do have to wonder if they're unaware
that they have members of the LGBTQ+ community and allies of the
community in their districts? It would be great if, in 2024, these
'representatives' could be voted out.
Chair Carolyn Maloney: The violence that took place at Club Q follows
years of long efforts by some state lawmakers to erase LGBTQ+ people
from school curriculum, limit their access to healthcare and undermine
their ability to fully participate in society. Now state lawmakers are
not alone. They're have been many actions here in Congress pushing the
same kind of draconian, extremist policies. For example, more than 30
House Republicans introduced their own version of Florida's "Don't Say
Gay or Trans" law which would restrict federal funding for schools that
include LGBTQ+ people in their curriculum. I'd like to ask Ms.
Robinson: How would a federal policy suppress even mentioning LGBTQ+
persons in classrooms further undermine the ability of LGBTQ+ Americans
to live authentically and safely? Ms. Robinson?
Robinson: Thank you for the question. And it's so critically important
what we teach our kids matters. We're teaching curriculum that not
only shows how important history is and what we can be in the future but
also what we value, who matters, who deserves dignity and respect. If
we erase LGBTQ+ people from the curriculum, it erases a value in our
lives. As Brandon said, this is our opportunity to be better and we can
do that. And it starts with how we educate our children. And I also
want to be clear that when we allow the pieces of legislation to move
forward that erase our communities, that dehumanize us, what it does is
create a dangerous environment that does support and feed these seeds of
hatred that exist in our world. It's not only dangerous, it's violent
to our people.
Chair Carolyn Maloney: Thank you. Ms. Pocock, what would a federal
"Don't Say Gay or Trans" law mean for the LGBTQ+ youth navigating their
communities across the country from your experience?
Pocock: Yes, you know, we worked really hard on a similar "Don't Say
Gay" bill that was being proposed in our, uh, in our state and, you
know, the truth is that we all need mentors and examples that we can
grow into and see ourselves in. And when our -- When we as a nation are
hiding our faces or our experiences or our contributions to this
nation, it really impacts young people and their ability to see others
like them and their ability to learn how we've contributed to this
nation. But more than that, it's erasure and it hurts. And so our
young people tell us that what they see and hear and feel when school
board members or politicians are advocating to erase them is that they
feel like they don't belong. They feel like their public schools are
not for them. And so it is so critically important that we are always
cheering these young people on. And one real simple way to do that is
to give them access to folks like me and those of us on the panel who
are LGBTQ and incredible human beings in this world because they can be
too. They just need us to support them and show them how.
Chair Carolyn Mahoney: Thank you. Following the enactment of
Florida's "Don't Say Gay or Trans" law, anti-LGBTQ+ rhetoric on social
media surged by more than 400%. Astonishingly. Dr Meyer, what is the
relationship between this surge and anti-LGBTQ+ rhetoric and the kind of
violence that took place at Club Q last month?
Ilan Meyer: I think it was mentioned already in the panel, this kind
of incitement encourages people to enact what they think is righteous
because of religious convictions and other types of ideologies that are
portrayed on social media wrongly and clearly this is creating an
environment where such violence is seen as not only acceptable but, as I
said, righteous and desirable and causing LGBT people a lot of harm --
not only in the -- those of them who actually experience violence, but
also everybody in the community who witnesses it,
A note. Many Democrats in the hearing use LGBTQIA. Some used the more
common LGBTQ or LGBTQ+. I myself haven't used LGBTQAI here. It stands
for Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender, Queer, Intersex and Asexual.
That's an expansive term and it's good to expand. We'll try to use it here in the future.
move to two idiots. First, Yvette Herrell. She showed up for a moment
in the hearing and completely misunderstood everything had been said --
most importantly when she completely distorted Dr Meyer's remarks,
twisted them to make them something he never said. I am not going to
sully his reputation by repeating her nonsense here. She also didn't
understand basic English as evidenced by her distortion of what Dr
Pocock was speaking of. (Or maybe her staff just wrote her poor crib
notes -- she wasn't present for the remarks from either that she elected
to comment on.)
Another idiot? Ranking
Member James Comer used the hearing to repeatedly play a victim. Most
infamously where he all but sobbed while proclaiming of the hearing:
Democrats are using Committee time and resources today to blame
Republicans for this horrendous crime. This is not an oversight
hearing. This is a "blame Republicans so we don't have to take
responsibility" for our own defund the police and soft on crime
Defund the police and soft on crime policies?
Let's, for the sake of argument, insist that's true.
What the hell does that have to do with the shooting?
Three patrons of the bar -- Richard M. Fierro, Thomas James and an unidentified trans woman -- took the shooter out. This wasn't a case
where the police were outside the club waiting to come in. Does Comer
really believe what he said? If so, can he pass a drug screen?
he can't, that would explain the hair. Did no one on his staff have a
comb? You can't get those cheap hair cuts and not comb. I don't have
to comb. All I have to do is run my fingers through my hair. But I pay
for a good haircut. The upper right side of his hair looked like he
cut it himself. And someone please tell him to sit on his jacket's coat tails or not
to wear the jacket. Is he that stupid? Does he not know you sit on the jacket
to get a crisp and clear line on the shoulders?
also lost it during US House Rep Cori Bush's time.
those who don't
know, unlike the Senate, members of the House have only five minutes
each round for questioning and comments during a hearing. Five
minutes. And any sensible person knows not to interrupt a
committee member during their five minutes (five each round). But there
was Comer sputtering of Bush's remarks -- while she was speaking, "That
-- that -- Madam Chair --
I mean, my G**." If you're new here, out of respect for all, we do not
allow what some see as blasphemy to go up here -- for any deity. We
always censor God if it's being used in vain. That's why we're
censoring Comer. I'll also add that I believe he was using the name in
vain. I could be wrong. You could also read it as he was calling
Carolyn Maloney his God. I don't think that's the case but I'll give
him the benefit of the doubt.
that he earned it.
He gave an opening statement that was over 640
words long. In it, he did manage to decry attacks on African-Americans,
on "Asian communities, Jewish communities and Christian communities" on
"churches and pro-life institution," on "all races and ethnicities" . .
. He left "on Comet, on Cupid, on Donner and Blitzen."
Know who else he left out?
That's what the hearing was about but in his opening remarks he did not
note them. (He referred to victims! Yes, he did. And, sorry, the
victims included straight people.) A hearing about violence against
LGBTQ+ and Comer can whine about himself but can't say, even once, that
attacks on LGBTQ+ are wrong. "Republicans condemn violence in all
forms," he insisted . . . while refusing to decry violence against that
He's full of it.
everyone needs to grasp that. Do not say, "Well he said all forms."
Yes, he did. And then he went on to specify groupings, many, many
groupings. None of which were lesbians, gay men, bisexuals or
transgenders. That is reality. Those were his own words and he wrote
his opening statement out ahead of time. He included every word he
wanted. He didn't want to include LGBTQ+. Don't pretend otherwise
unless you're an Aunty Gigi (a self-loathing closet case who is more
worried about impressing straight conservatives than in defending his
own rights and those of his family. Aunty Gigi is best exemplified by
Let's also note that he looked like he wanted to puke when Michael Anderson testified the following:
my fellow LGBTQ community, events like this are designed to discourage
us from speaking and living our truth. They are designed to scare us
from living openly, courageously and proudly. We must not succumb to
fear, we must live prouder and louder than ever before. We must
continue to be who we are, for who we are is exactly who we are meant to
be. And to the children watching this, feeling you may not be like
other kids: I understand you and I see you. You deserve to be exactly
who you are, no matter what anyone has to say. In the words of my
personal gay icon Christina Aguilera, you are beautiful no matter what
they say. Words can't bring you down, so don't let them bring you down
sure the Aunty Gigis will insist that by not naming them, Comer was
being kind -- after all so many others in his Republican Party trash
them out right with one lie after another. They'll pick the belly lint
and be content pretending its chocolate covered cherries. Too bad for
Aunty Gigi, the rest of the country's not so pathetic.
five people were killed in the attack on Club Q and twenty-five were injured (but how nice for Comer
to try to make it all about himself). James Slaugh spoke of his sister
who was injured in the attack:
have always struggled with my sexuality, not because I deny who I am,
but because many others do -- because others want to hurt me for being
me. My coming out story involves my family and their support. My
sister Charlene paved the way for me to accept myself. After she was
forced out of the closet and ultimately the house by our mom who -- at
the time -- believed being gay was a sin, our household went through a
transformation. In the end, love won, as it always will. Our mom
became loving and accepting. She chose her children and it was this
road to my sister and I had to endure that allowed me to feel safe
enough to say, 'Hey, Mom, I like guys.' She recently passed. But
before she did, for the past 15 years, she has been an advocate for our
community, especially in her religious circles.
was imitated by his fellow Republicans on the Committee. Virginia
Foxx, Fred Keller, Jody Hice also couldn't say gay or trans -- maybe
they thought were in a Florida school?
Couldn't mention the L or the G or the B or the T or the Q.
need to note Glenn Grothman because he did say "gay." He truly did.
Speaking of people murdered in the US this year, he decalred, "I assume
some of them were gay -- I don't know."
He didn't know.
I guess that passes for compassion and awareness for Republicans on the Committee.
was funny to watch the Republicans run from the terms. Jody Hice, for
example, freaking out and frothing about how people "blame Republicans
for these attacks" without ever saying who the attacks were on.
did say that "the rise of hate crimes concerns me, it concerns all of
us" and went on to identify the "hate crimes" as mean people who said
Trump staffers should have difficulty finding employment.
Yes, that is the great hate crime, Hice, you nailed it.
he offered this statement -- without saying who said it or whom it was
said to -- as an example of a hate crime, "You're all trash. I hate you
and I wish you harm."
Jody, when your wife speaks to you like that, consider marital counseling.
did manage to say, as he got really angry about someone being denied
service at a food establishment, "This was not LGB community, this was
Dr. Meyers tried to explain what a hate crime was during the hearing and it sailed right over the Republicans heads.
Let's not the Committee's press release on the hearing:
At Oversight Committee Hearing, Survivors of Anti-LGBTQI+ Violence Underscore Dangers of Anti-LGBTQI+ Extremism
Dec 14, 2022
At Oversight Committee Hearing, Survivors of Anti-LGBTQI+ Violence Underscore Dangers of Anti-LGBTQI+ Extremism
Washington, D.C. (Dec. 14, 2022)—Today, Rep. Carolyn B. Maloney, Chairwoman of the Committee on Oversight and Reform, held a hearing to
examine how the surge of anti-LGBTQI+ policies advanced in legislatures
across the country and the proliferation of extreme anti-LGBTQI+
rhetoric are fueling violence against LGBTQI+ people in the United
States, including the mass shooting that took place at the LGBTQI+
nightclub, Club Q, in Colorado Springs last month.
“Last month, a person with
an AR-15-style assault rifle entered Club Q—a nightclub that served as a
haven for LGBTQI+ people in the Colorado Springs community—and opened
fire on unsuspecting bar patrons and staff. The attacker’s depravity
robbed us of five innocent lives—Daniel Aston, Raymond Green Vance,
Kelly Loving, Ashley Paugh, and Derrick Rump,” said Chairwoman Maloney
in her opening statement.
“Let us honor them by recommitting to the bold action necessary to
ensure that every person in the United States can experience the freedom
to live authentically and safely—regardless of who they love or how
The Committee heard testimony from Michael Anderson and James Slaugh, survivors of the deadly Club Q shooting in Colorado Springs, Colorado, and Matthew Haynes, founding owner of Club Q. The Committee also heard testimony from Kelley Robinson, President of the Human Rights Campaign; Brandon Wolf, survivor of the Pulse Nightclub shooting; Olivia Hunt, Policy Director of the National Center for Transgender Equality; Jessie Pocock, CEO and Executive Director of Inside Out Youth Services; and Ilan Meyer, Distinguished Senior Scholar for Public Policy at the Williams Instititue
Survivors of anti-LGBTQI+
violence and expert witnesses emphasized that Republicans’ extremist
rhetoric and harmful policies have contributed to surging violence,
intimidation, and an unprecedented rise in hate crimes against the
Mr. Anderson testified:
“It was places like gay bars and clubs that helped me embrace who I was
and formed me into the man I am today … If you are fortunate enough to
intimately know LGBTQ people, you will find some of the kindest,
funniest, accepting, and most welcoming people. Those are the people
that found a safe place in Club Q and deserve to once again have that
safe space … I can still hear the rapid firing of bullets today. It’s a
sound I may never forget. It’s a sound I hope no one here or anywhere
else in this country has to hear.”
Mr. Haynes testified: “I
know that we, our Club Q community, are in the thoughts and prayers of
many of you. Unfortunately, these thoughts and prayers alone are not
saving lives. They are not changing the rhetoric of hate. None of us
ever imagined that our little bar in Colorado Springs would be the
target of the next hate crime, and I again repeat that we were targeted
for the next hate crime … When you take hate and access to military
style assault weapons, putting those together is total carnage.”
Mr. Slaugh testified: “ I
don’t want to imagine what may have happened if the shooter had not
been taken down that night. Five wonderful people were still murdered
and may we never forget their names. Ashley Paugh, Raymond Green Vance,
Daniel Aston, Derrick Rump, and Kelly Loving. We miss each of
Responding to Rep.
Cicilline, Brandon Wolf testified: “Words have consequences...people
should be accountable for the things that come out of their mouths and
when you’re willing to traffic in cheap shots and bigotry against a
marginalized community that is already seeing hate against it on the
rise, already seeing violence rising across the country, when you’re
willing to traffic in those things to score political points, you have
to be accountable for what happens next. you have to hold yourself
accountable for the impacts of your words.
Witnesses detailed the
growing list of harmful anti-LGBTQI+ policies championed by Republicans
at every level of government and the ways in which they are undermining
the ability of LGBTQI+ people to live authentically and without fear.
In response to a
question from Rep. Bush about the proliferation of Republican bills
targeting LGBTQI+ people, Ms. Robinson stated: “It’s a crisis that we
are experiencing. We are trying to be able to live freely, safely, and
wholly as our true selves in every aspect of life. And what we see is
continued legislative attacks paired with extremist rhetoric. And when
some of these bills are moving forward whether or not they are enacted,
they have a devastating impact on our community.”
Responding to a question
from Chairwoman Maloney about the threat of a federal “Don’t Say Gay”
law, Ms. Robinson testified: “When we allow these pieces of legislation
to move forward, that erase our communities, that dehumanize us, what
it does is create a dangerous environment that does support and feed
these seeds of hatred that exist in our world. It’s not only dangerous,
it’s violent to our people.”
Brandon Wolf explained
the impact of Florida’s law limiting discussion of sexual orientation or
gender identity in schools: “We’ve seen books being banned with LGBTQ
characters across the state. We’ve seen teachers being told to hide
their family photos in their desks. We've seen school districts like
Miami Dade County refusing to recognize LGBTQ history month for
instance, saying that it might violate the “Don’t Say Gay or Trans”
law. Those are just some of the impacts. They’re weighing most heavily
on LGBTQ families who fought really hard to see their loved ones
recognized and respected. It's weighing on teachers who are fleeing the
profession, we have over 9,000 teacher vacancies in Florida in part
because they’ve been undergoing character assassination over the last
couple of years. And finally it’s weighing most heavily on LGBTQ young
people. The Trevor Project tells us that almost two thirds of trans
young people are experiencing poorer mental health outcomes because of
policies like House Bill 1557 in Florida. So in short, the debate over
the humanity of LGBTQ people is making life harder and less safe for
people, especially in the state of Florida.”
In response to a
question from Rep. Raskin on how extreme Republican laws affect the
mental health and physical safety of LGBTQI+ youth, Ms. Hunt testified:
“When children are told that they’re not part of society, it teaches
them that they don’t belong, that they are lesser-than, and that they
are not as worthy as their classmates and as their peers. And that’s
not the message that we should ever be teaching to young children
anywhere in this country.”
Witnesses and Democratic
Members emphasized the need to take bold action to push back against
extreme anti-LGBTQI+ policies and advance the health, safety, and rights
of LGBTQI+ people
Responding to a question
from Congresswoman Norton on the importance of the Equality Act, Mr.
Wolf testified: “It’s important because we are not afforded the same
nondiscrimination protections as other people. I say this as a person in
the state of Florida. One of the things we’ve worked on with Equality
Florida for years is implementing comprehensive nondiscrimination
protections for LGBTQ people in our state, so what does that mean? It
means protecting people from being denied housing because we have a
boyfriend, not a girlfriend. It protects LGBTQ people from being fired
because we have a picture of our spouse on the desk.”
questioning from Rep. Raskin, Ms. Pocock explained: “We know that when
you build an inclusive classroom you have young folks who are more
engaged, who are more likely to show up in school, and so the best thing
that we can do is prevent negative outcomes by creating an inclusive
classroom, an inclusive church, an inclusive home. That is hands-down,
the research shows, the very best thing we can do for young people.”
We may return to the topic tomorrow. I've got enough my notes to do so and it was an important hearing.
A coalition of anti-war groups and rights
organisations have signed a letter urging congressional leadership to
put forth a measure to repeal the 2002 Authorization for the Use of
Military Force (AUMF) for Iraq.
The letter, sent to senators Chuck Schumer, Mitch McConnell, and
Patrick Leahy, as well as Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi and Kevin McCarthy,
among others, urged the lawmakers to take action on what it referred to
as a "long overdue repeal".
As of Wednesday, 37 organisations had signed the letter.
"Repealing this outdated and unnecessary law would constitute a basic
act of constitutional hygiene while also ensuring that the 2002 Iraq
AUMF cannot be misused to breathe new life into an unforeseen national
security crisis, driven by an unchecked president," the letter said.
"This scenario has already played out once, in early 2020; there is
nothing to prevent it playing out again, until Congress takes the 2002
Iraq AUMF off the books."
And we'll note CENTCOM issued the following:
Dec. 14, 2022
Release Number 20221214-10
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
BAGHDAD – On Dec. 13, Gen. Michael “Erik” Kurilla, CENTCOM
commander, visited Baghdad, where he met with Iraqi Prime Minister Shia’
Al-Sudani, Minister of Defense Thabet Mohammed Saeed, Chief of Defense
Lieutenant Gen. Abdul Amir Rashid Yarallah, and commander of Joint
Operations Command for Iraq Lieutenant Gen. Qais Al-Muhammadawi
The leaders discussed the current security situation in the region,
as well as opportunities to strengthen cooperation and coordination.
They spoke of progress in the development of the capabilities of the
Iraqi Security Forces. They also discussed ongoing operations to ensure
the enduring defeat of ISIS.
Qais provided Kurilla with a tour of the Joint Command Center as well
as a review of the Iraq command’s joint targeting process. He also
recognized U.S. Soldiers assigned to Operation Inherent Resolve for
their work alongside Iraqi forces.
These engagements strengthen bilateral relations between the U.S. and
Iraq and reaffirm CENTCOM’s commitment to the security and stability of
the Middle East.
Because Michael Cloud is loose in DC. Specifically in the US House of Representatives.
Did you ever know someone who was really dumb and didn't realize how stupid they were? They'd think they figured something out and they'd be grinning and speaking but you'd just feel embarrassed for them because they were so damn stupid?
That's Michael Cloud. How the fool got elected to anything, I have no idea.
He thought he was clever at today's House Oversight Committee about the increase in violence targeting the LGBTQ+ community. He wanted Dr. Jessie Pocock to disagree with him regarding parents being involved in their kids' school life. He was trying to lay a trap but just acting a buffoon.
Well, yes, parents should be involved. A caring adult makes a difference.
But what he really wanted was for her to condemn a teacher or counselor who a kid tells that they're LFBTQ+ and that adult doesn't go run to the parent and squeal.
Let me explain something to the idiot: Oral Roberts University is not teaching you about all religions.
I'm Catholic. Anything I confess to my priest? It's between us. The priest can't go back -- and couldn't when I was a kid -- and run to my mom or my dad and snitch on me.
I don't know what kind of a f**ked up stooge Michael Cloud is but he doesn't understand a damn thing.
Including when Dr. Pocock was attempting to explain Colorado laws (where she's from) with regards to confidentiality.
What an idiot.
Texas, you have a lot to be proud of but that moron Michael Cloud is not on that list.
Wednesday, December 14, 2022. In the Kurdistan some women are setting
themselves on fire, in the US Joe Biden takes part in history (even if
the White House staff bungles it) and much more.
Yesterday, US President Joe Biden signed The Respect for Marriage Act into law. The White House issued the following statement:
On Tuesday, December 13, 2022, the President signed into law:
8404, the “Respect for Marriage Act,” which establishes statutory
authority for same-sex and interracial marriages and repeals provisions
of law that once prevented any State or territory from being required to
give effect to a same-sex marriage from another State or territory.
Thank you to Speaker Pelosi, Representatives Nadler, Cicilline, and
Davids, Leader Schumer, Senators Baldwin, Collins, Portman, Sinema,
Tillis, Feinstein, and Booker, and many others for their leadership.
Leave it to the White House to mess that up. This was a time to quote Joe.
few outlets do, for a minute or two, they say Joe declared, "For most
of our nation’s history, we denied interracial couples and same
sex couples from these protections. We failed to treat them with equal
dignity and respect. And now, law requires that interracial marriage and
same sex marriage must be recognized as legal in every state in the
nation." That's really not an accurate quote but NPR and others are
running with it. What he said should have been in the statement that
the White House released.
Was the communications team too busy chatting with a celebrity (one who, Marcia noted,
wanted to thank people for the passage of the act but couldn't think of
one gay person to thank)? This is embarrassing, the White House needs
to get its act together. Yes, it's very good that the spokesperson had a
talking to by legal and, yes, she stuck to her lane yesterday (even
noting the Hatch Act all by herself). But this was a historic moment
and Joe's remarks needed to be noted. The White House staff failed
This was going to be the snapshot where
we could just note some good work done by Joe. Instead, we have to note
that the tiny statement above, in bold, issued by the White House (a)
isn't enough and (b) is so poorly written that when it appears to be a
quote (after the colon in bold), it's not really a quote. They bungled
Joe has his problems and issues and
we note them frequently here. But this was Joe's moment to shine --
and he did -- and he's let down by the people working at the White
House. How very sad.
Let's note some of what Joe said:
hello, hello. Today's a good day. A day America takes a final step
towards equality, towards liberty and justice -- not just for some but
for everyone. Everyone. Toward creating a nation where decency, dignity
and love are recognized, honored and protected. Today, I sign The
Respect for Marriage Act into law. Deciding whether to marry, who to
marry is one of the most profound decisions a person can make. And as
I've said before -- and some of you might remember on a certain TV show
ten years ago [NBC's MEET THE PRESS] -- I got in trouble -- marriage, I
mean this with all my heart, marriage is a simple proposition -- who do
you love and will you be loyal to that person you love. It's not more
complicated than that. And the law recognizes that everyone should have
the right to answer those questions for themselves without the
government interference. It also secures the federal rights,
protections, that come with marriage -- like when you're loved one gets
sick and you're legally recognized as the next of kin. For most of our
nation's history, we denied interracial couples and same sex couples
from these protections. We failed -- we failed to treat them with an
equal dignity and respect. And now, the law requires interracial
marriage and same sex marriage must be recognized as legal in every
state in the nation. I want to thank all of you for being here today,
for being part of this important movement.
MONTANARO: Our latest
NPR/PBS NewsHour/Marist poll, which is going to be released Thursday,
shows 68% are in favor of same-sex marriage. You know, it was still a
bit of a surprise. I have to say, though, that the bill got through
because it wasn't clear they could get the 60 votes to overcome a
filibuster because Republicans really have been much slower to embrace
same-sex marriage. But a dozen Republican senators voted for it, 39
Republicans in the House did, too. And it's really reflective of how the
country, even Republicans, are changing, even though GOP support, you
know, has been much less in our surveys, less than a majority.
SHAPIRO: All right. We've been describing this as now a law that
protects same-sex and interracial marriage. Beyond that top line,
explain exactly what it does and does not do.
MONTANARO: Yeah. Not everyone's celebrating this as the be all,
end all - and it's not. You know, this was largely passed because of the
threat that the conservative supermajority at the Supreme Court after
the Dobbs ruling that took away the right to an abortion, you know,
could overturn other rights, including same-sex marriage. You know,
while this bill gives federal benefits to same-sex couples, make sure
those marriages are recognized across state lines, it doesn't guarantee
that states won't deny marriage licenses to gay couples again if the
court overturns it. You know, and I have to say, one of the most
overlooked things in this bill, you know, isn't just about same-sex
marriage, but also interracial marriages. Easy to overlook because 94%
in the latest polling say they approve, but majorities didn't approve
until the late 1990s, which isn't that long ago for some of us.
On Tuesday evening, a heavy gunfire was reported in the US military base at the US Embassy in Baghdad, known as "Unit 3".
shooting was reported as eyewitnesses had earlier announced the flight
of as US military helicopter over Baghdad's Green Zone.
The shooting, the details of which are still unknown, happened in the
area of the US military base located in the US Embassy inside the
security and protected Green Zone of Baghdad, and some Iraqi sources,
such as Sabereen News Telegram channel embarked on broadcasting its
Staying on the topic of violence, we'll note this from BBC NEWS.
Women in Iraq are facing
rising levels of domestic abuse. Cases of gender-based violence have
seen a surge of 125% between 2020 and 2021, according to the United
Kurdistan region, women who feel trapped in abusive households often see
suicide by self-immolation as their only way out.
The Kurdistan Regional Government has tried to combat violence against women, but many remain at risk.
BBC has been granted rare access to one of the main hospitals for burns
in Iraqi Kurdistan, where many women die of self-inflicted burns.
The Iraqi Parliament recently drafted a law to ban publications
regarding queer issues. This has alarmed the members of the LGBTQ+
community in the country.
The law would punish anyone who would for any reason “publish or
promote” homosexuality in state’s media, institutions, schools,
universities, social media platforms, books, cinemas, theatres,
publications, and in public.
On December 3, 25 MPs, mostly from
Shia group Coordination Framework, which opposes influential cleric
Muqtada Al-Sadr, who is also Shia, signed a bill proposing the
criminalisation of all publishing on LGBTQ+ topics in Iraq.
Individual citizens could be fined one million Iraqi dinars ($685),
while government agencies and companies could be fined millions more.
the US today, US House Rep Carolyn Maloney will chair a hearing about
the rise of violence aimed at the LGBTQ+ community in the US:
Dec 12, 2022
New Human Rights Campaign President Kelley Robinson, Pulse Nightclub Shooting Survivor Brandon Wolf Also Slated to Testify
D.C. (December 12, 2022)—On Wednesday, December 14, 2022, at 10:00 a.m.
ET, Rep. Carolyn B. Maloney, the Chairwoman of the Committee on
Oversight and Reform, will hold a hearing to
examine how the surge of anti-LGBTQI+ policies advanced by Republican
lawmakers and the proliferation of extreme anti-LGBTQI+ rhetoric are
fueling a rise in violence against LGBTQI+ people in the United States.
The Committee will hear firsthand testimony from individuals impacted
by this violence, including survivors of last month’s mass shooting at the Colorado Springs LGBTQI+ nightclub Club Q that took the lives of five people.
“From Colorado Springs to my own
district in New York City, communities across the country are facing a
terrifying rise of anti-LGBTQI+ violence and extremism,” said Chairwoman
Maloney. “I am deeply grateful that survivors of these attacks are
coming before my Committee to share their stories with the American
people. Make no mistake, the rise in anti-LGBTQI+ extremism and the
despicable policies that Republicans at every level of government are
advancing to attack the health and safety of LGBTQI+ people are harming
the LGBTQI+ community and contributing to tragedies like what we saw at
Club Q. Next week, Republicans on my Committee and across the country
will be forced to face the real-life impact of their dangerous agenda. I
hope LGBTQI+ individuals across the country will see that Democrats in
Congress are fighting for them and will continue to push for policies
that protect and expand their ability to live authentically and safely.”
On November 19, 2022, a shooter
armed with an AR-15 style rifle opened fire on patrons and staff of the
LGBTQI+ nightclub Club Q in Colorado Springs, Colorado, killing five
people and injuring more than a dozen others.
The Club Q shooting comes as extremist, right-wing lawmakers at every level of government have advanced harmful policies that
undermine the ability of LGBTQI+ people to live authentically. In 2021
alone, state legislators introduced more than 340 pieces of
anti-LGBTQI+ legislation, including many that target LGBTQI+ people in classroom settings and health care.
Following the passage of Florida’s
anti-LGBTQI+ “Don’t Say Gay or Trans” law in March, vitriolic social
media content alleging that members of the LGBTQI+ community were
“groomers” skyrocketed by more than 400%. Since 2015, hate crimes have increased by 40%, with the last two years being the deadliest on record for transgender and gender non-conforming people.
Full Committee hearing entitled “The Rise of Anti-LGBTQI+ Extremism and Violence in the United States.”
Wednesday, December 14, 2022, at 10:00 a.m. ET
Survivor of Club Q Shooting
Survivor of Club Q Shooting
Founding Owner of Club Q
Human Rights Campaign
Survivor of Pulse Nightclub Shooting
National Center for Transgender Equality
CEO & Executive Director
Inside Out Youth Services
Distinguished Senior Scholar for Public Policy
The Williams Institute
Additional Witnesses to be Announced.
A livestream will be available on YouTube and the Committee on Oversight and Reform website.
Seating in the hearing room is limited
and as a result, credentialed media must RSVP to the Oversight
Committee Democrats Press Office at firstname.lastname@example.org no later than 5 p.m. ET on December 13, 2022.
We'll wind down with this from Will Lehman's campaign:
Dear fellow workers,
am gathering information from UAW members about what was and was not
done to inform members about the UAW election, if you or your co-workers
had problems receiving a ballot and similar information. Please fill out this form to assist this investigation.
am filing a formal protest to the UAW Monitor over the fundamental
unfairness of the UAW election. In the first round of voting, less than
10 percent of the 1.1 million active and retired UAW members who were
eligible to vote cast ballots. This was not due to apathy but the
deliberate policy of the UAW apparatus to suppress the vote and
disenfranchise hundreds of thousands of UAW members.
numbers of workers did not even know any election was taking place. The
UAW did not send out notices to inform them. Many workers never received
a ballot despite calls to local union offices and the UAW Monitor.
election in which 90 percent of the membership were excluded can be
legitimate. Neither Ray Curry nor Shaw Fain even received 4 percent of
the votes of the UAW membership. That is why I am asking the UAW Monitor
not to certify the results of this sham election. Instead, I am calling
on the monitor to include all five UAW presidential candidates in the
next round of voting and to compel the union to inform all members of
the new voting dates. Only in this way can every UAW member have the
right to meaningful vote in a free and fair election.