Tuesday, August 23, 2011

Feels like a Monday

It feels like a Monday. Or a Monday squared. What a long, long day. :(

I wish it was vacation time again. Soon, though, right? I was talking to Elaine and our plan has been to move to Hawaii when the community sites go dark. I'm not sure we're going to be able to do that.

I'm ready to live there full time as is she. We're not moving tomorrow. She's got her patients and other things and I've got stuff to do as well.

But I'm ready to move right now. More than ready.


Barry Grey (WSWS) reports:

The US Federal Reserve Board secretly handed out trillions of dollars in virtually free loans to major American and European banks at the height of the financial crisis between 2007 and 2010, according to an article posted Sunday by Bloomberg News. The article, based on an independent investigation carried out by Bloomberg of previously sealed Federal Reserve documents, is headlined "Wall Street Aristocracy Got $1.2 Trillion in Loans from Fed."

The amount cited in the headline is somewhat misleading, as it refers only to the highest single-day amount of outstanding Fed loans under seven emergency programs the US central bank launched to cover the bad debts of the Wall Street elite. The $1.2 trillion figure is undoubtedly lower than the total amount in loans disbursed over the course of the programs' existence, including loans to banks that came to the Fed for money multiple times.

The amounts involved were far greater than the cash injections provided the banks under the US Treasury's $700 billion Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP). Under that program, the ten biggest US banks received a total of $160 billion in cash, while, according to Bloomberg, they obtained $669 billion in emergency loans from the Fed.


Wow. They got that and they got our tax dollars via the Congress (really via Barack who strong armed the House -- specifically the Black Caucus -- to pass it).

They got all the money. What the hell did we get?

Here's C.I.'s "Iraq snapshot:"

Tuesday, August 23, 2011. Chaos and violence continue, Turkey vows to continue bombing northern Iraq, the US government announces they are okay with that, The Young Turks keep their audience informed, an Iraqi poet is remembered, the country's president attempts to get the government beyond Political Stalemate II, and more.
We'll start by noting this from the Feminist Majority Foundation:
WASHINGTON, DC -- August 26 is Women's Equality Day, the anniversary of the passage of the 19th Amendment granting women the right to vote. In recognition of this, and of the anniversary of the August, 1963 civil rights March on Washington, strengthening the right to vote for women of color, a coalition of women's organizations, representing millions of American women, will unveil HERvotes and release a list of top ten historic laws that impact women's lives, but are now most in danger of being weakened, cut, or eliminated by extremist policies at the local, state and federal levels, at a nation audio news conference on Wedensday, August 24.
AUDIO NEWS CONFERENCE
WHO:
Eleanor Smeal President, Feminist Majority
Joan Entmacher Vice-President for Family Economic Security, National Women's Law Center
Dr. Avis Jones-DeWeever Executive Director, National Council of Negro Women
Kristin Rowe-Finkbeiner Executive Director, MomsRising
WHEN: Wednesday, August 24, 2011 at 2:00 p.m. (Eastern Time)
HOW: Via toll-free number 800-289-0517 pass code: HERvotes
Women's leaders from participating organizations will be available for Q&A. See below list of participating organizations and their leaders.
HERvotes, Women's Groups Leadership
National Coaltion of 100 Black Women
Dee Dee Strum, President, president@nc100bw.org
American Association of University Women
Linda Hallman, President, executive@aauw.org
Black Women's Roundtable, National Coalition on Black Civic Participation
Melanie Campbell, Executive Director, melaniec@ncbcp.org
Dolores Huerta Foundation
Dolores Huerta, President
Feminist Majority Foundation/ Ms. Magazine community
Eleanor Smeal, President esmeal@feminist.org
MomsRising
Kristin Rowe-Finkbeiner, Executive Director,
Nationale Congress of Black Women
Dr. Faye Williams, Chair, dr.efayew@gmail.com
National Council of Women's Organization
Susan Scanlan, Chair, scanlan@wrei.org
National Council of Jewish Women
Sammie Mosehnberg, Director of Washington Operations, sammie@ncjw.org
National Latina Institute for Reproductive Health
Jessica Gonzalez-Rojas, Incoming Executive Director
National Organization for Women
Terry O'Neill, President, president@now.org
National Women's Health Network
Cindy Pearson, Executive Director, cpearson@nwhn.org
National Women's Law Center
Marcia Greenberger, Co-President, mgreenbergen@nwlc.org
Raising Women's Voices
Cindy Pearson, Co-Founder
Women's Information Network
Andrea Gleaves, Political Director, andrea.gleaves@gmail.com
Women's Research and Educational Institute (WREI)
Susan Scanlan, Executive Director
No, that has nothing to do with Iraq. At the end of the snapshot, we'll spend several paragraphs noting the passing of a true artist and a wonderful friend. But onto Iraq . . .
Today Mother Jones used an Iraq photo taken by Spc Crystal Hudson for their "We're Still at War: Photo of the Day." The Capital-Journal reports, "A departure ceremony will take place Wednesday for members of the 1st Battalion, 108th Aviation Regiment, Kansas National Guard, as they deploy for duty with Operation New Dawn in Iraq." That send-off will be tomorrow, 1:00 pm, at the Ramad Convention Center in Topeka. And the report notes that the Guard members are expected to spend a year in Iraq. No, the administration never really believed there would be a December 31st withdrawal of all US troops from Iraq. Yesterday on The Young Turks, Cenk Uygur addressed the news that the US military would be remaining in Iraq beyond the end of this year.
Cenk Uygur: So first in Iraq, [US Secretary of Defense Leon] Panetta says that we might have made "progress" and that his view is that the Iraqi government finally has said yes to us staying longer in Iraq. Now remember, President Bush signed the Status Of Forces Agreement -- SOFA for short -- saying that we will be leaving by the end of 2011. Now President Obama has said on multiple occassions, over and over again, that he was going to withdraw everybody and that he was going to stick to that agreement and, in fact, he constantly brags about, "Oh, we're getting out of Iraq and look at me I get you out of wars just like I promised on the campaign." Well maybe not. It looks like we're going to have -- No, no, no, the administration assures us, we won't have "combat troops" troops there because that is what President Obama has promised. That we might leave over 10,000 -- and that's a conservative number -- "noncombant troops." Will they have guns? Oh, yeah, they'll have guns, but they will be "trainers." So are we staying in Iraq a lot longer? You betcha.
Good for The Young Turks. Very few people have even covered in what is supposedly "left media." (I'm referring to alternative media, not corporate media, nor am I making a blanket statement that the media -- all the media -- is left.) Katrina vanden Heuvel used to love to grand stand on the Iraq War. Last Friday, Leon Panetta tells the country that troops staying in Iraq beyond December is a done-deal and Katrina 'weighs in' with a column on . . . Rick Perry. Priorities. Not even Robert Dreyfuss who supposedly Iraq for The Nation magazine has managed to write about it. At The Progressive? Not a word, not a peep. It's the same at In These Times. ZNet has nothing to say, of course, but, really, hasn't that been Michael Albert's whole sad life. (Yes, yes, it has.) So good for The Young Turks. They've told their audience the truth. Others on the left apparently haven't figured out how to yet spin this as a really good thing and something people should be grateful to Barack for doing.
You used to be so proud
Now you're head's a little lower
And you walk a little slower
And you don't talk so loud
--"Didn't You Know You'd Have To Cry Sometime," written by Nick Ashford and Valerie Simpson, recorded by everyone from Gladys Knight and the Pips to Diana Ross
Be grateful for Adam Green. Why? Adam Green is collecting Barack Obama's Tweets at 140 Elect and notes the Iraq Tweets from 2007 including:
BarackObama Barack Obama

Thinking we're only one signature away from ending the war in Iraq. Learn more at http://www.barackobama.com

46195712
BarackObama Barack Obama

Wondering why, four years after President Bush landed on an aircraft carrier and declared "Mission Accomplished," we are still at war?

77263482
BarackObama Barack Obama

In DC voting No… "We should not give the President a blank check to continue down this same, disastrous path."

Green points out that Barack was once against the Iraq War. In fairness to Barack, he didn't actually Tweet until after he was president. So we should say someone who Tweeted for him talked big about ending the Iraq War once upon a time.

Northern Iraq continues to be bombed by Turkish warplanes. Sebnem Arsu (New York Times) reports, "The Turkish military killed at least 100 Kurdish separatists and injured more than 80 during air strikes into northern Iraq during the past week, an army statement said on Tuesday. It added that the strikes would continue." Apparently 'modesty' prevented the Turkish military from boasting of the family of eight they killed on Friday. Why Arsu didn't note it is a question for the New York Times. Meanwhile Ivan Watson (CNN) notes, "On Sunday night, a PKK spokesman said no rebels had been killed." BBC News adds, "The PKK has confirmed three deaths, while local reports say a family of seven were killed by the bombing." Al Rafidayn reports that the KRG's Parliament has criticized the United States for not protecting the Kurdistan region from attacks by Turkey and Iran. The Speaker of the Kurdistan Regional Government, Kamal Kirkuki, held a press conference where he stated, "The Americans have thus far unfortunately refused to carry out their duty to maintain the safety of the borders and the skies of Iraq properly."
Nor will the US be defending northern Iraq anytime soon. At yesterday's US State Dept press briefing (link has text and video) the final question for spokesperson Victoria Nuland was about Turkey's continued bombing of northern Iraq and Nuland replied, "I don't think I have anything new on this from what we said last week, which was that we understand these air strikes were conducted, we recognize Turkey's right of self-defense, we urge Turkey and Iraq to maintain close contact on these issues and to cooperate." Wang Guanqum (Xinhua) reports the Turkish military claims they have "hit 13 targets in Metina, Zap, Avashin - Bashyan and Kharkurk on Aug. 20, four targets in Qandil, Gara, Zap and Metina on Aug. 21, and seven targets in Zap, Kharkurk, Avashim - Bashyan and Qandil on Aug. 22." And that the Turkish military claims their "jets hit 132 targets while artillery untis shelled 349 targets. Seventy-three hiding places, six shelters, 18 caves, eight depots, 14 buildings, one arsenal, nine anti-aircraft positions and three control points were destroyed." And that the Turkish military claims that "90 to 100 terrrorists were rendered ineffective [killed]. More than 80 terrorists were wounded." And, most importantl, this is, according to the Turkish military, a response to an August 17th PKK attack which left nine Turkish forces dead (one was a security guard) and fifteen more injured."
I guess if might made right, the country of Turkey would already be in the European Union. It doesn't and the country continues to struggle that its human rights policies are in keeping with those of the modern world. Constanze Letsch (Guardian) reports that the largest opposition party in Turkey, the Republican People's Party (CHP) is criticizing the government's response. Sezgin Tanrikulu, the party's deputy leader, is quoted stating, "For years, the Turkish government has battled the PKK with air strikes and ground operations. If military force would be the solution, we would not have a problem today. With no clear stance regarding democracy, human rights and freedom of speech, all the AKP currently does is incite discrimination and violence among the population.


The PKK is one of many Kurdish groups which supports and fights for a Kurdish homeland. Aaron Hess (International Socialist Review) described them in 2008, "The PKK emerged in 1984 as a major force in response to Turkey's oppression of its Kurdish population. Since the late 1970s, Turkey has waged a relentless war of attrition that has killed tens of thousands of Kurds and driven millions from their homes. The Kurds are the world's largest stateless population -- whose main population concentration straddles Turkey, Iraq, Iran, and Syria -- and have been the victims of imperialist wars and manipulation since the colonial period. While Turkey has granted limited rights to the Kurds in recent years in order to accommodate the European Union, which it seeks to join, even these are now at risk." The Kurdistan Regional Government in Iraq has been a concern to Turkey because they fear that if it ever moves from semi-autonomous to fully independent -- such as if Iraq was to break up into three regions -- then that would encourage the Kurdish population in Turkey. For that reason, Turkey is overly interested in all things Iraq. So much so that they signed an agreement with the US government in 2007 to share intelligence which the Turkish military has been using when launching bomb raids. However, this has not prevented the loss of civilian life in northern Iraq. Aaron Hess noted, "The Turkish establishment sees growing Kurdish power in Iraq as one step down the road to a mass separatist movement of Kurds within Turkey itself, fighting to unify a greater Kurdistan. In late October 2007, Turkey's daily newspaper Hurriyet accused the prime minister of the KRG, Massoud Barzani, of turning the 'Kurdish dream' into a 'Turkish nightmare'."
Dear People of Kurdistan,
As you know, the situation in the Kurdistan Region's border areas has deteriorated, causing our people to face daily Iranian and Turkish bombardment and aerial attacks.

These attacks have inflicted great suffering on our people in the border areas, leaving some dead and injured. They have intensified in recent days to the point that we can no longer remain silent and watch our innocent, vulnerable civilians pay the price of this fight.

The presence of armed PJAK and PKK members in the mountainous border areas provides an excuse for our two neighbouring countries to commit these attacks. The continuation of their actions, the use of violence, and the use of Kurdistan Region border areas as bases will lead to the spread of violence to the Kurdistan Region and this will not in any way help the legitimate Kurdish question. It is unfortunate that no consideration is given to the interests and welfare of the people of the Kurdistan Region.
It has been our policy all along, and we reiterate again, that the Kurdistan Region aspires to develop friendly and good neighbourly relations with all sides, and it has never been involved in the internal problems of these two countries. We would never interfere in the internal affairs of any country. However, we can not remain silent when our innocent citizens are being killed.
As the Kurdistan Region, we deplore the shedding of innocent blood. We believe that dialogue and mutual understanding are keys to resolving all problems. In the past, we never spared any effort to resolve these issues through dialogue and always advocated for the pursuit of peaceful means by all sides. Unfortunately, the situation has once again become complicated.
In some point in our history, we resorted to armed struggle to defend our land, to obtain our rights, and to protect the dignity of our people. With our resolve and with the backing of our people, we managed to preserve our existence and identity. But today is different. In today's world, the language of dialogue is far more effective than fighting and military action. We have spared no efforts to spread this message.
Our goal has always been the provision of prosperity for our people and maintaining the stability of our Region. We would never do anything to jeopardize the prosperity and stability of our Region, whatever the circumstances. Therefore, we request that the interests of the people of the Kurdistan Region be observed. The achievements made by our people are the result of hard work and great sacrifices, and it is incumbent on every Kurd to be proud of these achievements and to protect them.
It must be clear to the people of the Kurdistan Region that military action along the border areas gives an excuse to both countries to openly conduct their own military actions in the Kurdistan Region. The main victims of these bombardments and military actions are the people of the Kurdistan Region. I am certain that fighting and violence will not lead to any resolution. At the end of the day, peaceful means must be pursued. The sooner this fighting ends the better; however, if the opposing factions have chosen and insist on the option of fighting, we ask all sides to do their fighting elsewhere and spare the Kurdistan Region.
We are prepared for any cooperation to return the situation to normalcy through dialogue and peaceful means. At the same time, we call on the Iraqi federal government to use its diplomatic channels with our two neighbouring countries to bring these attacks to an end and protect the sovereignty of Iraq.
In light of this delicate situation, I ask the Iraqi Kurdistan Parliament to comprehensively study this situation and then formulate a policy that reflects the unanimous view of the Kurdistan Region.

Masoud Barzani
President of the Kurdistan Region of Iraq
Aswat al-Iraq reports, "Parliamentary Foreign Relations Commission MP warned of escalation of the crises with Iran and Turkey due to their continued military operations against the Kurdish border villages, calling the Iraqi government to adopt 'a firm stand' through opening a dialogue with the two countries."
Turning to some of today's reported violence, Reuters notes a Qaiyara sticky bombing claimed the life of 1 "oil policeman" and left his father injured, a Baghdad roadside bombing injured two people, a Kirkuk home invasion resulted in one farmer being injured, an al-Zab attack resulted in 1 "employee of the Baiji oil refinery" being injured, Dr. Hussein Kadhim of Baghdad University was shot dead in Baghdad and his won was left injured and, dropping back to Monday night for both of these, a Mosul home invasion resulted in two deaths and a Hit roadside bombing claimed the life of Hit council member Nofal al-Hity and his son while injuring one person.

Meanwhile Al Mada reports that Iraqi President Jalal Talabani is in Baghdad and plans to spend the next two days attempting to mediate between the State of Law and Iraqiya political slates. He has called for a return to the Erbil Agreement which ended Political Stalemate I in November but was quickly tossed aside by Nouri al-Maliki creating Political Stalemate II which is ongoing and has lasted over eight months so far. (Political Stalemate I lasted just over nine months.) Talabani is said to be optimistic and have seen encouraging signs in the meetings among all political parties that he hosted at his home over the summer. Dar Addustour adds that Talabani is also expected to announce the next meet-up of the political blocs and to urge that the security ministry posts are filled (filled with more than temporary or 'acting' heads) and the report notes that Iraqiya wants a national meeting to resolve the issue of Minster of Defense and Minister of the Interior.
Aswat al-Iraq notes that poet Nazek al-Malaiki's 88th birthday was celebrated by the internet search engine Google which "published the photo of the famous Iraqi poet" and "Google usually reminds millions of its recipients with the important events and annual memories of the most oustanding icons of science, culture, arts and politics, commemorating the birthday of Poet Malaika, being an outstanding lady poet of the Free Poem, on occasion of 88th birthday anniversary, as she was born in Baghdad on Aug. 23, 1923." She died in June of 2007. Alissa J. Rubin (New York Times) wrote in her paper's obituary:
In a country riven by sectarian strife, her life and work as a poet and a literary critic were poignant reminders of Iraq's cultural renaissance in the mid-20th century. Baghdad was then considered the Paris of the Middle East, and poets and artists flocked here to work.
Ms. Malaika was one of a small group of Iraqi poets who broke away from classical Arab poetry, with its rigid metric and rhyme schemes. Influenced by the writing of Shakespeare, Byron and Shelley as well as by classical Arabic poets, these poets took up modern topics and used lyrical language that spoke with the immediacy of life on the Arab street.
In a searing poem about honor killings, "To Wash Disgrace," in which a woman is killed by her father or brother for having dishonored the family by having a love affair before marriage, Ms. Malaika used simple language to convey the terrible loneliness of such a death.
Oh mother, a rattle, tears and darkness
Blood gushed out, and the stabbed body trembled.
"Oh mother!" Heard only by the executioner
Tomorrow the dawn will come and roses will wake up
Youth and enchanted hopes will ask for her
The meadows and the flowers will answer:
She left to wash the disgrace.
The brutal executioner returns
And meets people
"Disgrace!" He wipes his knife
"We've torn it apart."
And returned virtuous with a white reputation.
As a writer al-Mala'ika made her debut in 1947 with A'shiqat Al-Layl. Its themes of despair and disillusion were familiar from the Arabic literary romanticism of the 1930s and 1940s. Her second collection, Shazaya wa ramad (1949, Ashes and Shrapnel), helped launch free verse as a new form for avant-garde poetry. The old two-hemistich mono-rhymed form had flourished unchallenged for fifteen centuries. Experiments outside the rigid structures started in the beginning of the 20th century, but it was not until the mid-forties that poets succeeded in creating an acceptable form of free verse. Al-Mala'ika's book contained eleven poems and an introduction, in which al-Mala'ika explained the advantages of the new rhyme patterns as opposed to the old.
In the 1950s al-Mala'ika was among the most prominent figures of modernism, and backed the movement with her critical writings, when arguments were thrown for and against metrical poetry. With one of her best-known poems, 'Cholera', was based on the emotional effect of the cholera epidemic that arrived from Egypt to Iraq in 1947.
"The night is silent/Listen to the effect of groans/In the depth of darkness, below the silence, on the dead." Taking the subject from recent history, she first time demonstrated the possibilities of the modern verse. However, this poem still followed a certain rhyme scheme. Al-Mala'ika's collected articles, Qadaya 'l-shi'r al-mu'asir (1962), continued the debate for more sophisticated expression, and developed further some of the principles formulated in the introduction of Shazaya wa ramad.
Why do we fear words?
Some words are secret bells, the echoes
of their tone announce the start of a magic
And abundant time
Steeped in feeling and life,
So why should we fear words?
(from 'Love Song for Words')
Al-Mala'ika has also been a strong defender of women's rights. Her two lectures from the 1950s about women's position in patriarchal society, 'Woman between passivity and positive morality' (1953) and 'Fragmentation in Arab society' (1954), are still topical. In the late 1960s al-Mala'ika started to distance herself from experimentalism and developed more moralistic, conservative views-she also wrote religious poems and often used the two-hemistich form. Al-Mala'aika has kept a diary all her life; she still plays the oud she studied in her youth, and likes to sing the songs of Omm Kulthoum and Mohamed Abdel-Wahab. Al-Mala'aika has translated poems by such writers as Byron, Thomas Gray, and Rupert Brooke, but in the 1960s she also criticized young writers who have embraced too uncritically Western models.
In the US, Nick Ashford has passed away at the age of 70. Early on Nick met up with Valerie Simpson and the two became first a legendary songwriting team of Ashford & Simpson and then, later on, also a legendary vocal duo. One of the duo;'s biggest early hits was Ray Charles' recording of their "Let's Go Get Stoned." With some soul hits already under their belts, the duo joined Berry Gordy's Motown Records where they often produced the songs they wrote. This was in the sixties and Gladys Knight & The Pips, the Temptations, the Marvelettes and many other acts recorded their songs. While Diana Ross & The Supremes had a hit with "Some Things You Never Get Used To" and their work with Diana in the 70s would be pivotal, it was the duets they wrote for Marvin Gaye and Tammi Terrell that brought them the most fame, hits such as: "You're All I Need To Get By," "Ain't Nothing Like The Real Thing," "Ain't No Mountain High Enough" (which Amy Winehouse used in her "Tears Dry On Their Own") and "You're Precious Love." Loved by millions of young listeners (Motown was the sound of Young America), the inner rhymes of "Ain't Nothing Like The Real Thing" also impressed serious composers.
The sixties ended with Diana Ross & the Supremes having the last number one hit of that decade ("Someday We'll Be Together") and Diana now a solo act. It was very important to Berry that Diana's first release was impressive. A number of people were brought in to write songs for her and to produce song -- the legendary Bones Howe among them. But almost six months of recordings and Berry wasn't hearing anything special. That's when Nick and Valerie got their shot. And while they wrote one of Diana's standards with "Reach Out and Touch (Somebody's Hand)," the song they were most proud of was their re-working of "Ain't No Mountain High Enough" with a strong choir of voices, dramatic spoken passages and really unlike anything on the radio at that time. That may have been why Berry didn't hear it as hit material. To his credit, when radio stations began playing it on their own, Berry quickly got Ashford & Simpson to work on an edited version (the album version is six minutes and twenty seconds) of the track and Diana had her first solo number one hit. Recording with Ashford & Simpson, she also had in Diana Ross a classic album that showed her range and sophistication. The duo would return to work with Diana on her third album Surrender and demonstrate yet again how well their talents merged.
They would also work with Gladys Knight and the Pips, writing and producing the group's
About Love album (which took the group back into the top five on the soul charts) featuring "Landlord" and "Bougie Bougie" among other songs. For Chaka Khan, they'd write her first solo hit "I'm Every Woman" (produced by Arif Mardin) and, for her follow up album (Naughty), they'd write the top ten soul hit "Clouds." For Teddy Pendergrass, they'd write "Is It Still Good to You." They'd bring Teddy onstage in the summer of 1985 (July 13, 1985) at Live Aid to share their time. Though forgotten by some today, Live Aid was under serious criticism for the lack of Black performers. Tina Turner was a part of Live Aid . . . as Mick Jagger's guest, doing a duet with him. Ashford & Simpson were among the few Black performers booked and while performing their own classics like "Mighty Mighty Love," they made time to include Teddy Pendergrass in what was his first concert since the car accident that left him paralyzed.
The highly gifted music producer Quincy Jones recognized and appreciated the duo's talent and brought them in to work on the soundtrack of The Wiz when it was turned into a film. Their original song for the movie, "Is This What Feeling Gets?," is one of the most moving performances Diana Ross has ever recorded (which is really saying something). Diana and the duo reteamed for her classic The Boss album, which was probably the finest album she recorded during her original Motown run and one of the classic Motown albums -- right up there with Stevie Wonder's Talking Book and Marvin Gaye's What's Going On?
Though they first met in 1963 and charted the ups and downs of love better than anyone, the duo didn't start off as a romantic couple and when they did become a couple they waited many years until marrying. They were wed in 1974, a piviotal year that also saw them move from Motown to Warner Brothers where they became album artists -- still notching up the hits ("It Seems To Hang On," "Found A Cure," etc.) but also producing albums that worked as an entire collection and not just some songs all tossed onto the same disc with no rhyme or reason. 1982 saw the release of the masterpiece Street Opera, an eight song (plus reprise for nine tracks) concept album for which they also did a series of videos. As we noted at Third back in 2008:
"Gonna love it away, so cheer up," sing Ashford & Simpson on Street Opera's opening track. The 1982 concept album from Nickolas Ashford and Valerie Simpson gave the duo not only their second highest charting soul song (up to that point) with "Street Corner" (number nine), it also provided them with their second highest charting album on the soul charts (number five).
Other hits would follow on later albums including "High-Rise" and their number one soul hit "Solid" featuring a set of lyrics that Nick often said were the ones he was most proud of writing. As performers, they would make the top forty soul singles chart five more times, reaching number two with "I'll Be There For You." In 1988, they wrote Robert Flack's top forty soul and number one dance hit "Uh-uh Ooh-ooh Look Out (Here It Comes)." Nick is survived by Valerie and their two daughters and a mountain of songs that had -- that still has -- the whole world singing.

Monday, August 22, 2011

Isaiah, Third, Libya, 2012

Monday, Monday. And we need a grin so let's go to Isaiah's The World Today Just Nuts "Got A Vacation To Take Care Of First"

got a vacation to take care of first

If Barack really had a plan, he'd be starting it immediately, Mr. I Won't Rest Until I Have Created Jobs.

Alexander Burns (POLITICO) reports:

Barack Obama's polling has been so weak of late that some conservative Republicans are increasingly inclined to believe he'll be vulnerable, no matter who his opponent is.

That flies in the face of traditional political wisdom, which says an establishment-friendly candidate such as Mitt Romney (or, back in the day, Tim Pawlenty) would have an easier time capturing an electoral majority than, say, Michele Bachmann.

Gallup is out with new polling numbers that at least appear to reinforce the conservative case that Republicans can allow themselves to vote viscerally, not tactically, in 2012. Among regisered voters nationwide, the pollster finds little variation in how Mitt Romney, Rick Perry, Ron Paul and Michele Bachmann fare against Obama.


My two cents? Burns is right, everyone is not going to be electable. However, Barack is such a huge disappointment that everyone's looking for something to pin their hopes on.

Patrick Martin (WSWS) reports on the Libyan War:

The Libyan regime of Muammar Gaddafi appeared on the brink of collapse Sunday night, as ground forces of the NATO-backed Transitional National Council entered Tripoli, the capital city, from the west, south and east.

There were television reports Sunday night from neighborhoods of Tripoli where police and soldiers of the Gaddafi regime had fled and the anti-Gaddafi forces were in control. Other neighborhoods, particularly in the eastern half of the city, were said to be engulfed in heavy fighting between supporters and opponents of the regime, with hundreds dead.

Many units of the Libyan military were said to have fled their positions without a fight, including, significantly, the 32nd Brigade, a supposedly elite unit under the command of the longtime Libyan ruler’s son, Khamis. An Associated Press report said the military unit charged with the defense of downtown Tripoli and Muammar Gaddafi’s personal security had surrendered.

The same report said that rebel forces had reached Girgash, a neighborhood only a mile and a half from Green Square, the center of Tripoli and the symbolic heart of the regime, where Gaddafi’s supporters held rallies over the past five months in defiance of the NATO bombing campaign.



Okay, Dallas and the following:



The Third Estate Sunday Review's Jim, Dona, Ty, Jess and Ava,
Rebecca of Sex and Politics and Screeds and Attitude,
Betty of Thomas Friedman Is a Great Man,
C.I. of The Common Ills and The Third Estate Sunday Review,
Kat of Kat's Korner (of The Common Ills),
Cedric of Cedric's Big Mix,
Mike of Mikey Likes It!,
Elaine of Like Maria Said Paz),
Ruth of Ruth's Report,
Wally of The Daily Jot,
Trina of Trina's Kitchen,
Marcia of SICKOFITRDLZ,
Stan of Oh Boy It Never Ends,
Isaiah of The World Today Just Nuts,
and Ann of Ann's Mega Dub.

worked on the latest edition of Third.


Here's C.I.'s "Iraq snapshot:"

Monday August 22, 2011. Chaos and violence continue, confirmation in the words of Nouri's spokesperson that Leon Panetta told the truth last Friday, Turkish warplanes continue bombing northern Iraq and terrorizing and killing civilians in the region, Camp Ashraf, and more.
The things that I have done that I regret
The things I seen, I won't forget
For this life and so many more
And I'm trying to find my way home
Child inside me is long dead and gone
Somewhere between lost and alone
Trying to find my way home
-- "Trying To Find My Way Home," written by Jason Moon, from Moon's latest album Trying To Find My Way Home
Over the weekend, Robert Burns (Associated Press) noted the 2003 death in Iraq of 20-year-old Spc Justin W.Hebert and how almost "one-third of U.S. troops killed in Iraq were age 18 to 21. Well over half were in the lowest enlisted ranks." DoD currently lists the number of US military personnel killed in the Iraq War at [PDF format warning] 4478. That would mean that over 2,200 of the deaths were from the lowest enlisted ranks and about 1490 were 21-years-old or younger.
And those numbers have not stopped growing because the Iraq War is not over.
That's what Leon Panetta's remarks Friday were about. His remarks? Oh, sorry. Readers of the allegedly left publications The Progressive and The Nation don't know about that because those trashy magazines walked away from the war when Bush left office. It was all about hating Bush, not about ending wars. Both publications did have time for valentines to Russ Feingold (John Nichols writes one, Matthew Rothschild writes the other) for Russ' cowardly refusal to run (I know Russ and it was a coward's decision, no matter how much his fan club tries to dress it up). (And for those who gag at the immature ravings of Rothschild and Nichols, Hugh at Corrente provides a more clear eyed appraisal.) From Friday's snapshot:
Kevin Baron (Stars & Stripes) notes that the Iraqi response is that they have not agreed to trainers but US Secretary of Defense "Leon Panetta said Friday that Iraq has already said yet to extending noncombat U.S. forces there beyond 2011, and that the Pentagon is negotiating that presence [. . . that] there is unanimous consent among key Iraqi leaders to address U.S. demands. Those demands include that Iraqis begin negotiating internally what type of U.S. training force they would like, begin a process to select a defense minister, craft a new Status of Forces Agreement and increase operations against Iranian-backed militants." Reid J. Epstein (POLITICO) refers to a transcript and quotes Panetta stating, "My view is that they finally did say yes, which is that as a result of a meeting that Talabani had last week, that all of the, it was unanimous consent among the key leaders of the country to go ahead and request that we negotiate on some kind of training, what a training presence would look like, they did at least put in place a process to try and get a Minister of Defence decided and we think they're making some progress on that front."
To her credit, Amy Goodman did include the news in headlines today. She didn't mention Iraqi official reaction. And possibly that's because Iraqi reaction really wasn't what the English-language press was saying it was Friday. As we noted Saturday, Al Mada reports on Panetta's remarks and on Nouri's spokesperson Ali al-Dabbagh denying an agreement has already been made. But while denying it, Ali al-Dabbagh also stated that when "the polical blocs met, they approved the need to train security forces and the Iraqi military" which would be Panetta's point that it was now a done deal. So despite his denial, Ali al-Dabbagh's actual remarks back up what Panetta said. Dar Addustour also offers Ali al-Dabbagh's quote and, in addition, they report that the only perplexing issue in the negotiations is how many US troops remain. As we noted in Third's "Editorial: US will be in Iraq beyond 2011, Panetta and Iraqi government explain," Ali al-Dabbagh may claim he's refuting Panetta, but his remarks are backing up everything Panetta said Friday. Both agree that a deal's been agreed to in order to extend the US presence in Iraq beyond 2011 and both agree that the number of US service members that will remain in Iraq has yet to be determined.
Before Iraq issued their 'denial' on Friday (which appears to have been willfully misinterpreted by the press) and before the White House asked the press to clamp down on the story, Panetta's remarks were getting coverage and that's because they are news.
But what you're seeing, if you look closely, is that The Nation, The Progressive, In These Times, et al are nothing but protest pens. They're not about action, they're not about activism, they're not about news and they are not about information. But they will encourage you to rage away . . . within the white lines they've drawn, within the area they have designated for protest. And then they will feed you scary tells of the other and convince you that Republicans are the enemies and bring the gospel of trust and obey the Democratic Party.
i walked into your dream
and now i've forgotten
how to dream my own dream
you are the CLEVER one aren't you
brides in veils for you
we told you all of our secrets
all but one
so don't you even try
the phone has been disconnected
dripping with blood and with time
and with your advice
poison me against the moon
-- "Mother," written by Tori Amos, first appears on her Little Earthquakes
Enter the world of the faux left, little Veal Cutlet, where they will educate you on hating Republicans and insist that you have no where else to go but the Democratic Party so learn to fume in vain and never do anything. Learn to hate the other and learn to vote straight ticket. Learn or, honestly, be conditioned. Give up independent thought and grasp that wars are only bad when Republicans occupy the White House. The same wars -- be they the Iraq War or the Afghanistan War or what have you -- become unworthy of dicussion -- let alone protest -- when an anointed Democrat, a blessed Dem, is sworn in as president. That's the magical reactionary way of the faux left.
And by refusing to ever stand for principals or beliefs, they not only encourage illegal wars, they encourage the trashing of the safety net and so much more. They are the reason for the current state of the United States. (Read Chris Hedges' Death of the Liberal Class.)
Aaron (Love to Blame) notes Panetta's remarks and includes the following figures:
Alexander Higgins notes the extension needs to be added to Barack Obama's "long list of lies and broken campaign promises" and highlights Madison Ruppert (Activist Post) who states," "For those not aware, in the politically correct military parlance parroted by the media, 'training forces' is a nice way of saying Special Forces troops who instruct and train the Iraq military to bring about the brutal death and destruction they specialize in." Press TV speaks (link has text and video) with Michael Maloof (who used to be with the Pentagon's Technology Security Operations).

Press TV: You've touched upon this a bit, but I'd like you to expand on this - Obama has never really stood by the reasons the US went to war against Iraq - Why is he so motivated to stay in Iraq now?

Michael Maloof: I think it's because of the changing circumstances; and you're only talking 10,000 troops; it's supposed to be a token amount, or they might agree to the extension of the 40,000 that are there. But it's not going to really matter in terms of what effectiveness they can accomplish. I think the US is also under increasing pressure from the Saudis. It's my understanding that the Saudis have decided to go on their own - they no longer trust the US -- to basically create their own army; a rapid reaction force if you will and they're very much concerned about the plight of the Sunnis in Iraq. And so they're going to put pressure on the US to at least maintain some kind of presence there in order to in effect try to disrupt the forward motion of Iranian influence in what is an Arab world in that region and also because of the concern the Saudis have over the plight of the Sunnis there. Iraq has gone relatively unnoticed in the press in recent months. The war in Afghanistan and the killing of Osama bin Laden had replaced the focus on Iraq. But while the fighting and bloodletting in Iraq may have dissipated in recent months, it never ended.
AKE's John Drake Tweets:
John Drake
johnfdrake Everyone is looking at #Libya, but at least 90 people were killed and 355 injured in violence in #Iraq last week.
The violence never ends in the ongoing war which is one of the points Mehdi Hasan makes in "Barack Obama's wars without end" (Guardian):

Iraq, meanwhile, has become the forgotten war -- yet an astonishing 47,000 US troops remain stationed there. Earlier this month, Obama told a group of supporters: "If somebody asks about the war [in Iraq] … you have a pretty simple answer, which is all our folks are going to be out of there by the end of the year."
Not quite. US military leaders expect to keep up to 10,000 "folks" in Iraq beyond the 31 December 2011 deadline, agreed by the Bush administration, for a full US withdrawal. Obama's hawkish new defence secretary, Leon Panetta, used his Senate confirmation hearings in June to announce that he had "every confidence" that the Iraqi government would "request" US troops to stay on in the country beyond the end of the year. However the anti-US Iraqi cleric Moqtada al-Sadr declared this month that any foreign soldier remaining in Iraq in 2012 would "be treated as an unjust invader and should be opposed with military resistance". So we can expect further bloodshed in that benighted nation: America's Mesopotamian misadventure is far from over.

The violence has also included, since Wednesday, Turkish military planes bombing northern Iraq. AFP notes today was the sixth day of the latest bombing campaign allegedly aimed at the PKK. The PKK is one of many Kurdish groups which supports and fights for a Kurdish homeland. Aaron Hess (International Socialist Review) described them in 2008, "The PKK emerged in 1984 as a major force in response to Turkey's oppression of its Kurdish population. Since the late 1970s, Turkey has waged a relentless war of attrition that has killed tens of thousands of Kurds and driven millions from their homes. The Kurds are the world's largest stateless population -- whose main population concentration straddles Turkey, Iraq, Iran, and Syria -- and have been the victims of imperialist wars and manipulation since the colonial period. While Turkey has granted limited rights to the Kurds in recent years in order to accommodate the European Union, which it seeks to join, even these are now at risk." The Kurdistan Regional Government in Iraq has been a concern to Turkey because they fear that if it ever moves from semi-autonomous to fully independent -- such as if Iraq was to break up into three regions -- then that would encourage the Kurdish population in Turkey. For that reason, Turkey is overly interested in all things Iraq. So much so that they signed an agreement with the US government in 2007 to share intelligence which the Turkish military has been using when launching bomb raids. However, this has not prevented the loss of civilian life in northern Iraq. Aaron Hess noted, "The Turkish establishment sees growing Kurdish power in Iraq as one step down the road to a mass separatist movement of Kurds within Turkey itself, fighting to unify a greater Kurdistan. In late October 2007, Turkey's daily newspaper Hurriyet accused the prime minister of the KRG, Massoud Barzani, of turning the 'Kurdish dream' into a 'Turkish nightmare'."
Yesterday Michael S. Schmidt and Omar al-Jawoshy (New York Times) reported that one of the Sunday Turkish bombings killed 2 children and 5 adult civilians in the area. Shamal Aqrawi (Reuters) noted that the Turkish government has yet to confirm that they carried out the daytime bombing but "A Reuters witness said he saw six Turkish warplanes take off from a base in southeastern Turkey on Sunday morning but it was not immediately clear where the planes were headed." Al Jazeera noted, "Turkey's military has said the jets are targeting PKK sites only -- including shelters, anti-aircraft gun positions and ammunition depots -- showing 'the necessary' care not to harm civilians." CNN reported that the 7 killed by the Turkish bombing today were 2 parents and their five children. CNN also notes:

In a phone call to CNN on Sunday from Northern Iraq, a PKK spokesman placed the blame for the latest round of hostilities squarely on the Turkish government and its prime minister, Recep Tayyip Erdogan.
"Erdogan has decided for an all-out war," said Roj Welat. "We will use our right to defend ourselves and our people. ... There will be new things probably, new developments will occur, but in what way I cannot say. But all I can say is Kurds will defend themselves. And we are calling on all the European countries, especially the United States, not to support state terror."

Today Alsumaria TV quotes the mayor of Zar Kali village, Ismail Abdullah, stating, "The final death toll of the Turkish shelling targeting a car in a village of Qandil mountains reached 8 dead including two children and two women." The network also notes that farmers and shepherds are being forced to flee their homes due to the constant bombings.
Hurriyet noted that the Turkish goverment states that they intend to continue the "cross-border military operations until Kurdish militants in northern Iraq are totally eliminated" while the "the Kurdish Regional Administration says the issue can only be solved through dialogue as it condemns the military attacks. 'It is no longer the time for violence or war. It is the time for peace and dialogue,' the administration says in expressing its discomfort." Aswat al-Iraq adds, "The chairman of the NGOs in Kurdistan called on global governments and authorities to work towards a termination of the continued bombardments against Kurdistan territories. Adnan Anwar Bey said in press conference, attended by Aswat al-Iraq, that the NGOs 'call on the UN Security Council, the European Union, and the U.S. to stop Turkish atrocities.' He demanded the federal government bear its responsibilities in regards to these violations, not to be shy and take necessary measures to stop these attacks." The US is, of course, in no position to end the bombings. Not only are they supplying the Turkish government with intelligence used for the bombings, the US government has justified the Turkish attacks with their own actions.
Aswat al-Iraq reports, "The President of northern Iraq's Kurdistan Region, Massoud Barzani, has expressed anger and condemnation for the Turkish air raids on border areas in Kurdistan Region, that killed [8] Kurdish citizens on Sunday." And Aswat al-Iraq reports that Kamal Karkuki, Speaker of the KRG Parliament, held a press conference today in which he declared, "In the name of the parliament, we denounce these bombings and call upon the Turkish government to immediately stop them." Al Sabaah reports that a delegation from the Iraqi Parliament's Commission on Security and Defense will be visiting the areas shelled to determine the damage being inflicted which they will report back to Parliament. Aswat al-Iraq notes a demostration against the bombings took place in Sulaimaniya Province with the protesters demanding "the local government adopt a stern attitude against Turkey and pressure it to cease and desist these operations that led to some killings and material losses." Shamal Aqraqi (Reuters) adds, "At least 2,000 people demonstrated late on Sunday in the northern town of Rania as the victims were buried, and 300 more marched silently from a bus station to a mosque in mourning on Monday, the town's mayor said." Hayman Raheem (Azzaman) offers, "The Iraqi government is too week to respond – not in kind but even verbally. The two neighboring states give themselves a free hand to attack the country, killing scores of Iraqis, wounding hundreds and forcing tens of thousands to flee their villages. One would have thought U.S. troops -- more than 50,000 of them still remain in Iraq -- had the task of safeguarding the country against external aggression. But these troops -- which legally are bound to defend Iraq – have not removed a finger against the neighboring aggressors. What is then the use of the U.S. occupation troops in the country?"
In other reported violence, Wang Guanqun (Xinhua) reports, "Three Iraqi soldiers were killed and six people wounded in bomb and gunfire attacks in Baghdad and Iraq's northern city of Mosul, the police said on Monday." Reuters notes 1 suspect was shot dead and two police officer were left injured in an armed clash in Kirkuk and a Baquba home invasion resulted in the deaths of 1 "man and his three-year-old daughter."
Meanwhile Al Mada reports the Parliament's Human Rights Commission is calling for the issue of "confidential informants" to be addressed due to the fact that many people are behind bars who may be innocent but were accused by "confidential informants." Parliament has been attempting to craft an amnesty law and many MPs state that any general policy must also address those imprisoned due to "confidential informants." Last year, Parliament voted into law a policy that would lead to maximum sentences for "confidential informants" who provided false information but that hoped for deterrent has had little impact.
UPI notes that US Army Gen Jeffrey Buchanan has stated that Iraq's Prime Minister and puppet Nouri al-Maliki's inability to fill "the Interior and Defense ministries" have led to huge political delays. Nouri was supposed to have appointed the ministers of both ministries and the National Security Ministry by December 25th or a new prime minister-designate was supposed to be picked. When you're named prime minister-designate, you have 30 days to propose your cabinet and get Parliament to vote to approve each minister. That's in the Constitution but no one really seems to care whether or not it's followed. Nouri didn't fill the posts and the expectation was that he would do so quickly. He didn't. He assumed the posts as his own. More recently he's appointed two "acting" ministers. But they have no power, were not approved by the Parliament and can be fired at any time by Nouri without approval of the Parliament. In other words, the puppet now has two of his own.
Saturday, Dar Addustour noted that things are currently moving forward on the creation of the national council (agreed to in November's Erbil Agreement) and that Ayad Allawi is expected to head the council and Moqtada al-Sadr's bloc is publicly supporting the creation of the council and Allawi as head of it. Today, Aswat al-Iraq reports, Iraqi President Jalal "Talabani and his two vice-presidents confirmed necessity to develop the political process through implementing Arbil agreement and abide by the resolutions reached during the last meeting of the leaders of the political blocs."
In Iraq there are 3400 residents of Camp Ashraf. For years they stayed in Iraq at the invitation of Saddam Hussein. When the US military invaded Iraq in 2003, they made a deal with these Iranian dissidents promising them protection if they would disarm. In "Tell the whore likability is not legality," earlier this month we took on the lies of Elizabeth Rubin (altering figures from the RAND Corporation to 'improve' her argument, for example) and I really thought that piece would be it on the subject. Specifically this:
The residents of Camp Ashraf are protected persons and needed to be recognized as such. The massacre last April was the second big attack. Both attacks are in violation of the agreement that the US government and Iraq signed. The US is obviously not going to enforce the agreement. Therefore, it is up to the US State Dept to begin working overtime on finding countries that the residents of Camp Ashraf can be resetteld to. If the residents say "no" to resettlement? My opinion -- disagree if you want -- then the US government states, "We are not able or willing to keep agreement we made with you, we are sorry. But what we can do is resettle you. We will do that for six months/three months and then we're done. You're remaining in Iraq puts you at risk. Your refusal to resettle will be seen as an acknowledgment of that risk and an admission that you are choosing to stay while knowing that the US cannot protect you." My opinion -- feel free to disagree. Do I think that's honorable? No. But it's very clear the US government will no longer live up to the promise it made to the residents of Camp Ashraf and that reality needs to be conveyed so that anyone thinking, "Oh, I'll stay, the US will still protect me, they're just saying that to appease Nouri," gets the message that there is no more protection.

I also feel like every time someone writes about the residents of Camp Ashraf and Scott Horton (Antiwar.com) sees it, he decides the world needs to suffer through five 'reports' by him on the MEK which means that the ongoing wars don't get addressed because Scott's got a beef he wants to air, a petty personal war that he allows to overtake his show and the purporse of it. So I'm really not into the subject to put it mildly. But a friend called earlier today about Howard Dean's piece at Huffington Post and asked if I was going to leave Howard hanging? No. I'll walk out on the limb with him. In his piece, Howard goes over various legal issues involving the MEK (as stated before, the MEK as a group or movement is not our concern here, the MEK who are inside Iraq -- residents of Camp Ashraf -- are our concern) and he covers the residents of Camp Ashraf. We'll note this:
America gave its word to the MEK that we would protect them. We believe that allowing 3,400 people to be murdered in cold blood and breaking that promise is wrong. We believe that in the end this debate is about America, not the people in Ashraf. America is a country that values freedom and the rule of law. We must keep our word and help the people of Ashraf get out of Iraq. We must support those who peacefully and through democratic means fight for their freedom. If we fail and again stand by as 3,400 unarmed men, women and children, in Ashraf are murdered by the Iranian Government or its Iraqi proxies, we diminish ourselves as a great nation. Its time for America to keep its word to the people in Ashraf.
Because the New York Times printed a smear against Wesley Clark (and failed to carry Clark's full response to the smear -- Wesley's comments were reduced to a half a sentence -- I know Wesley Clark and I know Howard Dean) and against others who have spoken out in favor of the residents of Camp Ashraf (which would also include former US Senator Evan Bayh, whom I also know) we'll also note Howard's paragraph responding to those smears which means we include the paragraph above a second time:
Some are suggesting that a distinguished group of bipartisan and knowledgeable counter-terrorism American experts, including former Directors of the CIA, NSA, NSC, FBI, an Attorney General, Secretary of Homeland Security, Chiefs of the Joint Staff, Marine Corps Commandant, NATO Commander, CENTCOM Commander, DOS Asst Sec for Counter-Terrorism, governors, ambassadors, generals, and many others, are being paid for their support of the residents of Ashraf.
This is simply not true. America gave its word to the MEK that we would protect them. We believe that allowing 3,400 people to be murdered in cold blood and breaking that promise is wrong. We believe that in the end this debate is about America, not the people in Ashraf. America is a country that values freedom and the rule of law. We must keep our word and help the people of Ashraf get out of Iraq. We must support those who peacefully and through democratic means fight for their freedom. If we fail and again stand by as 3,400 unarmed men, women and children, in Ashraf are murdered by the Iranian Government or its Iraqi proxies, we diminish ourselves as a great nation. Its time for America to keep its word to the people in Ashraf.
My opinion, I've never known the three (Wesley, Howard, Evan) to do anything just for money or to take a position -- especially a controversial one -- that they didn't believe in. People can disagree with them (and with me -- disagree with me absolutely, I'm frequently wrong), but I do find the smear that they've taken the position that they have because someone tossed a few coins their way. All three of have healthy egos and wouldn't risk their reputations on an issue just because someone gave him a few bits and pieces of currency.
Turning to veterans' issues, the New York Times editorial board offered the strongly worded "More Excuses and Delays From the V.A." this morning.

The things that I have done that I regret
The things I seen, I won't forget
For this life and so many more
And I'm trying to find my way home
Child inside me is long dead and gone
Somewhere between lost and alone
Trying to find my way home
-- "Trying To Find My Way Home," written by Jason Moon, from Moon's latest album Trying To Find My Way Home
Jason Moon served in Iraq. He's used music to address what he experienced there. Adam Smith (Milwaukee Journal Sentinel -- link has text and video) reports on Adam and his new CD Trying to Find My Way Home (which you can download from Amazon for $8.99). From the article:

"All of these songs that I had written are about what it feels like to come home," he said. "Each song is like a little demon, a little monster that had been haunting me."
Moon began playing and performing in his hometown of Eagle River and at the University of Wisconsin-Oshkosh. He hosted weekly open mic sessions, wrote dozens of songs and played hundreds of shows from 1995 until he was deployed in 2003. Being in Iraq at the beginning of the war was traumatic and confusing, he said, and performing for the troops was a way of coping.
After returning home, Moon said, he struggled with post-traumatic stress disorder and depression. Although songwriting is one of his greatest joys, he found himself unable to complete a single song.


Staying with the topic of healing, if you can express it, you don't necessarily cure it, but you can recognize it and you can name it and that in of itself can be a huge help. Iraq Veterans Against the War announces the Veterans and Community Conference: Coming Home Through Art and Dialogue to be held by Warrior Writers on September 9th through 11th in Chicago:

Warrior Writers hosts this powerful gathering of veterans, artists, supporters and healers focused on art-making and wellness. The conference will feature writing and art-making workshops, seminars on how to build healthy relationships between veterans and allies, and discussion panels exploring local support for veterans. Holistic Healing sessions will be offered free of charge to veterans throughout the conference. Veterans will be building a creative community around their shared experiences. Our overall goal is to create space and community for veterans and their supporters to engage in healing and the re-integration process together. Visual artists are especially encouraged to attend.
Documentation Teams will be working (all day). Contact us to help: info@warriorwriters.org
WORKSHOP DESCRIPTIONS:
Working with Veterans 101- an arts-based workshop for civilian allies
This workshop is centered around building beneficial veteran-civilian relationships. We will explore participant's perceptions about and relationships with veterans. We'll utilize creative writing/art-making, dialogue, participatory learning and active listening processes, as well as, the artwork of Veteran artists to guide our discussions. Some areas of learning & investigation will include: veterans' issues and experiences, PTSD, challenges/benefits of working with veterans, and specific information about healthy ways of engaging veterans. This workshop will provide a foundation from which civilian allies can build healthy and sustainable relationships with veterans and move toward creative collaboration. We also require any volunteers interested in facilitation or arts collaboration through Warrior Writers to attend a training with us. Art/reflections from this workshop will be collected as possible content for the Veterans' Mural; however, there is no obligation to submit work for the mural.
Veterans Writing Workshop
Our workshops are designed to assist veterans to share stories, opinions, and ideas, using prompts to enable participants to do productive writing/reflecting/story-telling/art-making on the spot where they learn by doing. Prompts and discussions cover a variety of military issues and experiences such as joining the military, homecoming, deployment, relationships, healing, growth, anger, etc. A crucial aspect of the workshop is that the discussions and writings are guided by participation. Veterans' support for each other is a key aspect of collaboration. A highlight for many veterans is having a space to air pent-up thoughts with others who understand and a sense of empowerment in the ability to tell their own stories. The workshop is for any military veteran regardless of their experiences with writing, combat, art, deployment, etc. Writing from this workshop will be collected as possible content for the Veterans' Mural; however, there is no obligation to submit work for the mural.
Visual Arts Collaboration Session/Community Creativity Session
Veterans and civilians come together to explore writing done by veterans in earlier workshops. Writing will be shared with the group as a whole before dividing into smaller sections to focus on particular artistic areas. Some groups will work to create visual representations of the writing, while others will focus on editing the work, or preparing it to be performed on stage. The visual creations and performances will be utilized for the Veterans' Mural and related activities,however, there is no obligation to submit work for the mural. Community members must have attended an allies training.
Writers Workshop/Facilitator's Training
Interested in possibly running a writing workshop in your area? Maybe looking to do closer work with veterans in the future? Warrior Writers founder Lovella Calica will lead a training for veterans and allies interested in facilitating workshops. Having attended a Warrior Writers allies training is a MUST for civilians interested in attending this workshop. The format is the same as a regular WW workshop, but with added tips, conversations and a DIY guide; essentially, you see it in action. Attendance to this workshop does not authorize one to lead workshops using the WW name, but is a stepping stone in the process. Art/reflections from this workshop will be collected as possible content for the Veterans' Mural; however, there is no obligation to submit work for the mural.
HOLISTIC HEALING SESSIONS
Healing practitioners in the skills of acupuncture, yoga, reiki, massage therapy, and other areas will be offering free sessions to veterans throughout both days. If you are a healer, contact us to help: info@warriorwriters.org