Sunday, May 25, 2025

Idiot of the Week

 First up, Katie Phang.



I'm going to try to note her show often.  I didn't do that with MSNBC.  And maybe a little more talk online from me and others would have made them realize what they had.  She's a really strong commentator. 


Idiot of the week?


So many possibilities.  In fact, always too, too many.

 

Chump got smacked down over his stupidity.  Colin Kalmbacher (LAW & CRIME) reports:

An attorney with the Department of Justice faced a highly skeptical judge in Manhattan on Wednesday while defending President Donald Trump‘s new regime of international tariffs.

Arguing before a three-judge panel on the U.S. Court of International Trade, DOJ lawyer Brett Shumate repeatedly saw his arguments run up against a judicial wall in the form of Senior Judge Jane A. Restani, who was appointed to the Big Apple-based court by Ronald Reagan.

During the hearing, the specialized court, empowered to hear all national and some international civil disputes over trade-related matters, considered a motion for a preliminary injunction filed by Oregon, which aims to put the kibosh on Trump’s “illegal tariffs.”

The government lawyer had a particularly hard time with various arguments before Restani, while the other judges also asked exacting questions of both sides, according to courtroom reports by the Capital Press, the Globe and Mail, and the Reuters wire service.
At one point during the hearing, the DOJ lawyer offered a public policy defense of Trump’s tariffs.

“The purpose of these tariffs is to create pressure,” he said, “Tariffs right now are giving the president the leverage he needs.”
The judge rubbished this line of thought as immaterial, focusing instead on fundamental statutory interpretation.

“It may be a very dandy plan, but it has to meet the statute,” Restani said.


That's only one possibility.  There are others. 

Excuse me, I've got to take care of something real quick.  "Phillips?  Pity party of one?  Dean Phillips?"


If you missed it Dean's whining again.  Now it's MSNBC's fault that he didn't get the Democratic Party nomination.  He attacked in an interview with WHORE Jessica Yellen.


The WHORE agreed with him.  'It's just a lie chamber for the Democrats!'


Really, WHORE.  Because Jessica WHORE Yellin worked for MSNBC.  I called her out back then.  She was a WHORE for the Iraq War.  A WHORE.  And we were all calling her back out then.  When she got fired, she then started saying she was forced to distort the truth and pretty up the war effort.


WHORE.


That's all she is.  People are dead because of her WHORING.  Iraqis are dead, US troops are dead.  WHORE.


There is no forgiveness for her.


She was the Judy Miller of TV news.


Dean Phillips picked the perfect fake ass to take his fake ass whines too.


No one liked him, no one wanted him to run.  All he did was whine on the campaign trail and that's all he does now.  He really needs to shut the f**k up.  


His refusal to grasp that makes him a strong contender for Idiot of the Week. 


But he's already been 'honored' with "Asshole of the week."

And then there's Doo-Doo DeSantis, there's always Doo-Doo DeSantis.  Daniel Villarreal (LGBTQ NATION) reports:

An appeals court has issued another legal defeat against Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis‘ attempt to ban all-ages drag performances, calling the law overbroad and saying that it attempts to take a “shotgun” to constitutionally protected free speech rights.

This week, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals issued a 2-1 decision against the law, effectively continuing a lower court’s injunction against the law and sending it back down to Florida’s Middle District to receive a full bench trial.

Appeals Court Judge Robin Rosenbaum wrote that the law’s prohibition against “lewd conduct” was like a “prosecutorial skeleton key” that any state officials could use to ban speech that they consider obscene.

“Florida’s S.B. 1438 takes an ‘I know it when I see it’ approach to regulating expression,” Rosenbaum wrote in the majority court decision. “The Act prohibits children’s admission to ‘live performances’ that Florida considers obscene for minors. But by providing only vague guidance as to which performances it prohibits, the Act wields a shotgun when the First Amendment allows a scalpel at most.”

“The possibility that [Florida officials] might view a gender-bending but chaste drag performance as ‘lewd’ and lacking ‘value’ is far from an unreasonable conclusion,” she added.

Rosenbaum also called the law “the Goldilocks of speech regulation, ensuring each child can access only that speech that is ‘just right’ for their age.” However, she said that what might be considered appropriate for a 15-year-old might differ from what might be considered appropriate for a 16-, 17-, 18-year-old, or a pre-teen child.

She also noted that Miami is home to a historic, 35-foot-tall billboard for Coppertone sunscreen, which features the brand’s historic logo—“a girl, perhaps age seven, or so, with a dog pulling at her swimsuit, revealing her pale posterior and its contrast with her tanned skin,” Florida Politics reported.

“Would a depiction like the Coppertone logo be ‘patently offensive’ for a five-year-old? An eight-year-old? How about a 17-year-old? We don’t know, and we don’t think the burden should be on speakers to find out,” Rosenbaum wrote.


Ha ha Doo-Doo DeSantis, full of crap as usual.  


So those are good nominees.  But the Idiot of the Week has to go to . . . 


The Chump administration -- a brainless and soulless collective.  If you don't see how they won it, go read C.I.'s snapshot for Wednesday recapping Kriti Noem, Junior, Billy Long (a nominee not yet confirmed) and Marco Rubio lying non-stop to Congress.

Read what they told the Senate and grasp how stupid they are and how they think we are even more stupid than they are.


They are the Idiots of the Week.


Here's C.I.'s "The Snapshot:"


Friday, May 23, 2025.  The administration's lies are so bad even PEOPLE MAGAZINE is reporting on them, Pam Bondi thought deleting a transcript on the White House website meant it was gone from all public records, the war on immigrants continues, and much more.




As noted in yesterday's snapshot, Republicans in the House of Representatives passed the hideous budget bill early Thursday and it now heads to the Senate.  Jen Psaki was a member of the Obama administration -- spokesperson for the State Dept was her most prominent role in the Obama administration -- and a member of the Biden administration -- White House press secretary.  On her MSNBC show last night, she addressed where things stand now.  


 So although some Republicans are saying the bill will be final before the leave for July 4th vacations, Jen notes that it often takes five months.  And she notes that in whatever time it takes, this measure crammed through in all night sessions will now be subject to scrutiny from the press and to comment from the public which may impact what stays in and what doesn't.  As of this week, it is not a done deal.

And that's good because there are so many awful things about the bill that we already know.

Katie Phang has left MSNBC and is now with the MEIDAS NEWS NETWORK.  Yesterday, she addressed the administration's latest DOGE lies.




To avoid honoring the Freedom of Information Act, as Ann noted last night, the White House is now insisting -- in a legal filing -- that Musk is not "a part of DOGE."

Not a part of DOGE?

Lie.

We know it's a lie.  

I know it and you know it.  

Pam Bondi knows it.


The White House, as I was informed by someone in the administration -- Donald and Tulsi, figure out who your leaker is!!! -- has been deleting postings that undercut and expose the lies they tell in their legal filings -- the many lies they tell in their many legal filings.  Supposedly, this move was recommended by the 'genius' that is Pam Bondi

That's why they've taken down a February posting.


404 / Page Not Found
We couldn’t find that page. Back to home.


You know they're stupid.  Maybe Secretary of Education Linda McMahon tutors them all daily -- that would explain how they get more stupid each day.

But mistaking herself for Blair on THE FACTS OF LIFE, Pam Bondi was hit with 'another one of my brilliant ideas' and shared that they needed to be sure that things that undercut and exposed the lies that they were telling in legal filings -- they're telling a lot of lies in legal filings -- are not seen, they should pull them from the White House website.

[Added at 6:40 pm EST May 23, 2025: A CNN friend called to tell me Brian Stelter wrote yesterday about disappearing things at the White House website.  In his report, Brian notes HUFFINGTON POST's SV Date reported on disappearing items at that website on May 15th.  Was not aware of those, sorry.  What we're noting above is Pam Bondi called for things to be pulled down because the official record doesn't match what the administration argues in court filings.]

Again, they're really stupid.  

Yes, they pulled a transcript of a joint-interview that Chump and Musk did in February.

But, sorry, that didn't make the interview disappear.

It's still out there.  Sean Hannity interviewed the two.  


  Via ROLL CALL, this is from the transcript of the interview and I'm pulling what I feel are key sections that refute the lie that Musk was not part of DOGE -- and I don't have time to fact check the two liars -- three, forgot Sean! -- so here we go:



Sean Hannity 00:00:04-00:00:05 (1 sec)
Great to see you.

Elon Musk 00:00:05-00:00:05 (1 sec)
Thanks. Thanks for having me.

Sean Hannity 00:00:05-00:00:07 (1 sec)
I've been reading a lot about you.

Sean Hannity 00:00:07-00:00:21 (15 sec)
I've got to start with this. So, he's working for free with DOGE. He's -- he's kind of put a lot of his life on hold, and you sued Twitter a number of years ago. You just made him pay you $10 million?

Donald Trump 00:00:21-00:00:22 (1 sec)
That's right. That's right.

Sean Hannity 00:00:22-00:00:23 (1 sec)
That's -- that's right. [Laughs]

Donald Trump 00:00:23-00:00:26 (2 sec)
Well, I sued -- I sued from long before he had it.

Elon Musk 00:00:26-00:00:26 (1 sec)
Yeah. Yeah. [Inaudible]

[. . .]



Donald Trump 00:08:02-00:08:21 (19 sec)
Because, I mean, he doesn't talk about it. He's actually a very good businessman. And when he talks about the executive orders -- and this is probably true for all presidents: You write an executive order and you think it's done, you send it out; it doesn't get done. It doesn't get implemented. They don't implement it. They -- maybe they're from the last administration -- and they are, in some cases.

Donald Trump 00:08:21-00:08:41 (21 sec)
You try and get them out as fast as you can. But I could -- as soon as he said that, I said, "You know, that's interesting." You write a beautiful executive -- and you sign it and you assume it's going to be done, but it's not. What he does is he takes it, and with his hundred geniuses -- he's got some very brilliant young people working for him that dress much worse than him, actually --

Elon Musk 00:08:41-00:08:42 ( sec)
Yeah, the do.


Donald Trump 00:08:42-00:08:44 (3 sec)
-- they dress in just t-shirts. [Laughter] You wouldn't know they have 180 IQ.

Sean Hannity 00:08:44-00:08:48 (3 sec)
Wait. Wait. So, what -- he's -- he's your tech support?

Elon Musk 00:08:48-00:08:48 ( sec)
I --


Donald Trump 00:08:48-00:08:48 ( sec)
No, no. He is --

Elon Musk 00:08:48-00:08:50 (2 sec)
I actually virtually am tech support.

Donald Trump 00:08:50-00:08:50 (1 sec)
He's much more than that.

Elon Musk 00:08:50-00:08:52 (2 sec)
I actually am tech support, though. But that's --

Donald Trump 00:08:52-00:09:05 (12 sec)
But he gets it done. He's a leader. He really is a -- he gets it done. You get a lot of tech people, and you have people, they're good with tech, but they -- he gets it done. You know, I said, in real estate, you had guys that would draw beautiful renderings of a building, and they'd draw the rendering, it would be great, and you'd say, "Great.

Donald Trump 00:09:05-00:09:20 (15 sec)
When are you starting?" But they were never able to get it built. They couldn't get the finances. They couldn't get the approvals. It would never get done. And then you have other guys that are able to get it done. You know, they could just get it done. I was in real estate. Same thing in this. He gets it done.


Donald Trump 00:09:20-00:09:42 (22 sec)
So, when he said that -- he said, "You know, when you sign these executive orders, a lot of them don't get done, and maybe the most important ones," and he would take that executive order that I'd signed, and he would have those people go to whatever agency it was -- "When are you doing it? Get it done. Get it done." And some guy that maybe didn't want to do it, all of a sudden, he's signing -- he just doesn't want to bothered.

Sean Hannity 00:09:42-00:09:47 (5 sec)
Does -- do a lot of those executive orders have to be codified into law to -- do you need the Republican Congress to follow up?

Donald Trump 00:09:47-00:09:49 (3 sec)
Yeah, and they will. A lot of them will be. Yeah.
[. . .]

Donald Trump 00:11:06-00:11:19 (13 sec)
But the team we have is -- is really unbelievable. But those executive orders, I sign them, and now they get passed on to him and his group and other people, and they're all getting done. We're getting them done.




Sean Hannity 00:14:18-00:14:31 (13 sec)
But this is the interesting -- but this is where we are as a so- -- a society. And I -- I hate to do this to you, but I'm going to do it anyway. You're doing all of these things. At DOGE, nobody at DOGE gets paid a penny, correct?

Elon Musk 00:14:31-00:14:33 (3 sec)
Well, actually, some people are federal employees, so they do.

Sean Hannity 00:14:33-00:14:34 (1 sec)
Oh, okay.

Elon Musk 00:14:34-00:14:43 (9 sec)
Yeah. They're [Inaudible]. But it's fair to say that the software engineers at DOGE could be earning millions of dollars a year and instead of earning a small fraction of that as federal employees.

Sean Hannity 00:14:43-00:14:45 (2 sec)
Okay. So, just --

Donald Trump 00:14:45-00:14:46 (1 sec)
And they're very committed people.

Elon Musk 00:14:46-00:14:47 (1 sec)
Yes.



So the exchange tells us that Musk has a bunch of 'geniuses' under him (Donald's term) and that Musk is implementing these executive orders as Chump signs them.  But he's not a part of DOGE?

Remember Alien in the Oval Office?  

2daddies


That's Isaiah's THE WORLD TODAY JUST NUTS "I Have Two Daddies" -- remember that day now?  Where Musk went to the Oval Office and spoke to reporters while rubbing his son's head repeatedly against his crotch?



Via THE AMERICAN PRESIDENCY PROJECT's transcript, here's some of what was said February 11th regarding Musk and Doge:


President Donald Trump: And we're going to be signing a very important deal today. It's DOGE. And I'm going to ask Elon to tell you a little bit about it and some of the things that we've found, which is shocking: billions and billions of dollars in waste, fraud, and abuse. And I think it's very important.

And that's one of the reasons I got elected. I said we're going to do that. Nobody had any idea it was that bad, that sick, and that corrupt. And it seems hard to believe that judges want to try and stop us from looking for corruption, especially when we found hundreds of millions of dollars' worth—much more than that—in just a short period of time. And we want to weed out the corruption, and it seems hard to believe that a judge could say, "We don't want you to do that."

Well, so, maybe we have to look at the judges, because that's very serious. I think it's a very serious violation.

I'll ask Elon Musk to say a few words, and we'll take some questions.

Elon, go ahead.

Senior Adviser Musk. Sure.

So, the—at a—high level, if you say, "What is the goal of DOGE" or—and, I think, a significant part of this Presidency is to restore democracy. This may seem—like, "Well, aren't we in a democracy?" Well, if you don't have a feedback loop—

X Æ A-Xii Musk. [Inaudible]

Senior Adviser Musk. Okay, X—we'd have to—if you—[laughter]. Sorry. I tell you, gravitas can be difficult sometimes. [Laughter]

So, if—there's not a good feedback loop from the people to—the Government and—if you have rule of—the bureaucrat—or if the bureaucracy is in charge and—then what meaning does democracy actually have? If the people cannot vote and have their will be decided by their elected representatives in the form of the President and—the Senate and the House, then we don't live in a democracy. We live in a bureaucracy.

So, it's incredibly important that we close that feedback loop, we fix that feedback loop, and that the public—the public's elected representatives—the President, the House, and the Senate—decide what happens, as opposed to an—a large unelected bureaucracy.

[Senior Adviser Musk continued his remarks, concluding as follows.]

So, what—what I really want to say is, like, it's not optional for us—to reduce the Federal expenses; it's essential. It's essential for America to remain solvent as a country, and it's essential for America to have the resources necessary to provide things to its citizens and not simply be servicing vast amounts of debt.

The President. And, also, could you mention some of the things that your team has found, some of the crazy numbers, including the woman that walked away with about $30 million, et cetera?

Senior Adviser Musk. Right. Well, we—are—we do find it sort of rather odd that, you know, there—are quite a few people in—the bureaucracy who—have, ostensibly, a salary of a few hundred thousand dollars but somehow managed to accrue tens of millions of dollars of net worth while they are in that position, which is—[laughter]—you know, what—what happened at USAID. We're just curious as to where it came from. Maybe they're very good at investing, in which case we should take their investment advice, perhaps. But just—there seems to be—mysteriously, they get wealthy. We don't—why? Where does it come from?

And I think the reality is that they're getting wealthy at the taxpayer expense. That's— the—that's the honest truth of it.

[Senior Adviser Musk continued his remarks, concluding as follows.]

So, anyway. So, I think—you know, that's an example—like, at a high level, if you could say, like, how do we increase prosperity, is we get people to do—to shift from roles that are low to negative productivity to high productivity roles. And so, you increase the total output of goods and services, which means that there's a higher standard of living available for everyone. That's—that's the actual goal.

Everyone is very quiet, by the way. Is it—are people normally this quiet? [Laughter]

Q. Your—detractors, Mr. Musk——

Senior Adviser Musk. I have—what?

Q. ——including a lot of Democrats—

Senior Adviser Musk. I have detractors?

Q. You do, sir.

Senior Adviser Musk. I don't believe it.

Q. ——say that you're orchestrating a hostile takeover of Government and doing it in a nontransparent way. What's your response to that criticism?

Senior Adviser Musk. Well, first of all, you couldn't ask for a stronger mandate from the public. The public voted, you know, that we—have a majority of the public vote voting for President Trump. We won the House. We won the Senate.


I don't have time to correct all the lies but this is a lie that keeps getting repeated.  Donald Chump did not get a majority of the votes.  

He got 49% of the votes, Kamala Harris got 47% of the votes.  

That is not a majority.  It is a plurality.  

They are not the same thing.

Alien Musk is a racist born and raised in apartheid South Africa.  He does not know democracy.  He's supposed to know basic math but as evidenced by his terming a plurality a majority, I doubt his math skills as well.


Musk: The people voted for major government reform. There should be no doubt about that. That was—on the campaign, the President spoke about that at every rally. The people voted for major Government reform, and that's what people are going to get. They're going to get what they voted for.

And—a lot of times, you know, people—they don't get what they voted for. But in this Presidency, they are going to get what they voted for, and that's what democracy is all about.


I thought it was immigration and cheaper grocery prices that people voted for?  It's amazing how they lie and use the claim that less than half of the voters selecting Chump 



Q. Mr. Musk, the White House says——

Senior Adviser Musk. Yes.

Q. ——that you will identify and excuse yourself——

Q. I have one more.

Q. ——from any conflicts of interest that you may have. Does that mean that you are, in effect, policing yourself? What are the checks and balances that are in place to ensure that there is accountability and transparency?

Senior Adviser Musk. Well, we—actually are trying to be as transparent as possible. In fact, our actions—we post our actions to the DOGE handle on X and to the DOGE website. So, all of our actions we are—maximally transparent. In fact, I don't think there's been—I can't—I don't know of a case that—where—an organization has been more transparent than the DOGE organization.

And—so—you know, and—the kind of things we're doing are, I think, very— simple and basic. They're—not—we're—you know, what I mentioned, for—example, about Treasury just making sure that—payments that go out, taxpayer money that goes out is —categorized correctly, that the—the payment is explained, that organizations on the Do Not Pay list, which are—it takes a lot to get there—they actually are not paid, which currently they are paid.

These—are not individual judgment decisions. These are about simply having sensible checks and balances in the system itself to ensure that taxpayer money is spent well.

So, it's got nothing to do with, like, say, a contract with some company of mine at all.

Government Ethics/Efficiency Efforts

Q. But if there is a conflict in—of interest when it comes to you, yourself—for instance, you've received billions of dollars in Federal contracts when it comes to the Pentagon, for instance, which the President, I know, has directed you to look into——

Senior Adviser Musk. Yes.

Q. ——are you policing yourself in that? Is there any sort of accountability check and balance in place that would provide any transparency for the American people?

Senior Adviser Musk. Well, all of our actions are—are fully public. So, if you see anything—you say, like: "Wait a second. Hey, Elon, that doesn't—that seems like maybe that's—you know, there's a conflict there." It's—it's not like people are going to be shy about saying that. They'll say it immediately. You know?

Q. Including you, yourself, right?

Senior Adviser Musk. Yes. But it's what—transparency is what builds trust, not simply somebody asserting trust. So, not somebody saying they're trustworthy, but transparency so you can see everything that's going on. And then you can see am I doing something that benefits one of my companies or not. It's totally obvious.

Q. But——

The President. And if we thought that, we would not let him do that segment or look in that area—if we thought there was a lack of transparency or a conflict of interest. And we watch that also.

He's——

Q. [Inaudible]

The President. He's a big businessman. He's a successful guy. That's why we want him doing this. We don't want a—an unsuccessful guy doing this.

Now, one thing also that Elon hasn't really mentioned are the groups of people that are getting some of these payments. They're ridiculous, and we're talking about billions of dollars that we've already found. We found fraud and abuse. I would say those two words, as opposed to the third word that I usually use. But in this case, fraud and abuse. It's abusive because most of these things are virtually made-up or, certainly, money shouldn't be sent to them. And you know what I'm talking about. It's crazy. So—but we're talking about tens of billions of dollars that we've already found.

And now a judge, who is an activist judge, wants to try and stop us from doing this. Why? Why would they want to do that? I campaigned on this. I campaigned on the fact that I said Government is corrupt, and it is very corrupt. It's very, very—it's also foolish.


We're stopping there.  I can only stomach so much garbage.  JFK said, "Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country."  Chump says, "I campaigned on the fact that I said Government is corrupt, and it is very corrupt."  Yes, when headed by a Convicted Felon it is very corrupt.  But it's not supposed to be nor is the leader of our government supposed to verbally attack and insult the government or threaten judges or do any of the nonsense that Chump does.


They're lying and the public record exposes them as liars.  Musk was a part of DOGE, he was over it and Chump felt the need to bring him into the Oval Office to address reporters with questions regarding DOGE.  Pam Bondi doesn't control the internet, thank goodness, so she can only suggest taking pages down from the White House's official site.

But reality remains all over the internet and she can't erase the public record -- though we all know she'd love to if she could.  And, again, good luck Tulsi and Donald and figuring out who passed on about Pam's 'brilliant idea' that Donald knew was going to be the answer in court filings.


They lie in court filings all the time.  Especially when it comes to their war on immigrants.  They have to lie because the administration is made up of disgusting people doing disgusting things.  AP reports the latest disgusting effort on the part of the White House:

The Trump administration is seeking to end an immigration policy cornerstone that since the 1990s has offered protections to child migrants in federal custody, a move that will be challenged by advocates, according to a court filing Thursday.

The protections in place, known as the Flores Settlement Agreement, largely limit to 72 hours the amount of time that child migrants traveling alone or with family and detained by the U.S. Border Patrol. They also ensure the children are kept in safe and sanitary conditions.

Government attorneys called the Flores agreement an “intrusive regime” that has “ossified” federal immigration policy. In a motion filed Thursday afternoon, they contend that the agreement is no longer necessary after Congress passed legislation and government agencies enforced policies that also implement standards and regulations called for in the agreement.


They truly are vile and disgusting.  They kidnapped over 300 men that they then sent to a gulag in El Salvador.  The men were denied due process, they were denied their rights.  One of them is noted by Christopher Wiggins (THE ADVOCATE):


When Jon Lovett and Tim Miller take the stage alongside Sarah Longwell — a prominent anti-Trump conservative, publisher of The Bulwark, and out lesbian advocate — at Washington, D.C.’s Lincoln Theatre during WorldPride, the tone will be fast, furious, and undeniably funny. Expect jokes. Possibly drag. But beneath the riotous banter and righteous shade, the “Free Andry" event is dead serious.
The Crooked Media–Bulwark live show, slated for June 6, is a fundraiser for Andry Hernández Romero, a 31-year-old gay Venezuelan asylum-seeker who came to the United States legally, seeking protection from violence for being gay. Instead, he was disappeared by President Donald Trump’s administration and deported to El Salvador’s notorious CECOT prison — a place so dystopian it’s been compared to a modern-day concentration camp. His lawyers haven’t heard from him since. There is no proof of life.

“This is the worst thing that Trump has done — which is a very competitive category,” Miller said in an interview with The Advocate. “They kidnapped someone who followed the rules, lied about him, and disappeared him.”

Hernández Romero’s ordeal began after he made an asylum appointment through the CBP One app, a legal channel established by the Biden administration and repurposed under Trump. He passed a credible fear interview and was detained at Otay Mesa Detention Center, a CoreCivic-run facility in California. He had no criminal history. His lawyer was preparing for his hearing. Then he vanished.


The administration is a collective of War Criminals.  They are lying about people and they know they're lying.  Meredith Kile (PEOPLE MAGAZINE) reports:

Gabbard's chief of staff, Joe Kent, reportedly instructed the National Intelligence Council to edit official assessments so that they aligned with Trump’s statements about Venezuelan gang activity
  • Leaked emails show that Tulsi Gabbard's top aide urged intelligence officials to change their findings on Venezuelan gang activity in order to align with statements President Trump has made on immigration.
  • Gabbard’s acting chief of staff, Joe Kent, emailed the National Intelligence Council about their report, writing, “We need to do some rewriting so this document is not used against [Gabbard] or POTUS.”
  • Gabbard, who serves as the director of national intelligence, later fired two top intelligence officials over the fallout from the report.

Tulsi Gabbard’s right-hand man allegedly directed a group of intelligence officials to alter their report on Venezuelan gang activity so that it would align with statements President Donald Trump has made on immigration.

[. . .]

However, the Feb. 26 intelligence assessment that Kent wanted to alter directly contradicted the idea that the gang was affiliated with the Venezuelan government or the Maduro regime.

The National Intelligence Council — an internal think-tank that analyzes information gathered by the CIA, FBI, National Security Agency and more — concluded in both the initial and revised assessments that the Venezuelan government “probably does not have a policy of cooperating with TDA and is not directing TDA movement to and operations in the United States.”



We'll wind down with this from Senator Patty Murray's office:

ICYMI: Murray Grills Trump’s FDA Nominee on Cancellation of Critical Vaccine Meeting, Upholding Science on Mifepristone, Contraception

***WATCH: Senator Murray Q&A with Commissioner Makary***

Washington, D.C. — Today, at a Senate Appropriations Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies (Ag-FDA) Subcommittee hearing on the fiscal year 2026 budget request for the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), U.S. Senator Patty Murray (D-WA), Vice Chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee and a senior member and former Chair of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee, grilled FDA Commissioner Marty Makary on the Trump administration’s reckless and chaotic efforts to fire thousands of critical employees at the FDA, conflicts of interest at the agency, and the Trump administration’s attempts to lay the groundwork to rip away access to mifepristone based on discredited junk science from anti-abortion activists.

In opening comments, Vice Chair Murray said:

“Commissioner Makary, the FDA has a really important job to do. Lives literally are at stake. And that work requires the utmost diligence, and care, and commitment to following the science and upholding FDA’s gold standard. We all expect to walk into the drugstore and know that what we are buying has passed a safety and efficacy standard. And we have to be assured of that, and we have to be assured that the work’s been done—that we don’t have to question that.  

“So, I don’t think it’s careful leadership when one-in-five people across the FDA are fired, only to frantically then bring some back—because you didn’t stop and think two seconds about whether these jobs were actually important.

“We really, Mr. Chairman, cannot cheap out on the FDA, and expect to maintain the gold standard that means that people know that drugs are safe.

“We can’t just cut, cut, cut and hope no one gets sick when you’re slow to issue a recall, or hope no one needs that medicine that had its approval delayed, or hope there isn’t another infant formula issue while your staff are getting fired, or getting rehired, or wherever they are.

“This work really takes investments, this Committee knows that, and it expects expert staff—like the people that have been shoved out the door. Drug approvals are already getting delayed. Food and drug safety inspections are lagging behind.

“We are going in the wrong direction, fast. We still have yet to see from you a full budget request from you. That is unacceptable.

“You are now testifying that the budget proposes to slash FDA by more than 11 percent. That’s actually news to all of us—and I will tell you right now, that is not going to fly. It is reckless, and it is not going to happen as long as I have anything to say about it.”

[FDA STAFFING]

Senator Murray began her questioning by pressing Dr. Makary on the harm and inefficacy caused by the Trump administration’s mass layoffs and efforts to push out qualified employees across FDA, which have resulted in more than 4,000 staff leaving the agency since the beginning of the Trump administration. “Commissioner Makary, when it comes to your mass firing of FDA employees, in April, you said, ‘I can tell you there were no cuts to scientists or inspectors.’ Well that is not true,” Senator Murray said. “I think Senator Ossoff covered that, and I think the point here is that all of this firing and rehiring—I don’t see how that’s efficient. Frankly, it kind of shows that you don’t know what you’re doing—and you’re breaking things in the process here. So, let me ask you a question, and hopefully it is an easy one for you. Does it save taxpayer dollars to fire staff who work in centers that are fully funded by user fees—not taxpayer dollars—yes or no?”

“You asked me to do an assessment of the staff when I came here for my confirmation hearing, and I hear that you’re criticizing me for bringing back some individuals after the cuts that I was not a part of,” replied Commissioner Makary.

“That’s good—I’m just saying in the long run, this has been very inefficient,” Senator Murray replied. “But my question to you is not about that it, and I know you’ve covered it with several other members. So does it save taxpayer dollars to fire staff who work with centers that are fully funded by user fees, not taxpayer dollars. Is that efficient?”

“The cuts were to HR, IT, communications—,” Commissioner Makary said.

Senator Murray pressed, “They’re funded by user fees, it is not saving any money.”

“In part,” Commissioner Markey interjected.

“But many of the staff you fired were in centers that are actually fully funded by user fees. You know that, correct?” Senator Murray clarified.

Commissioner Makary continued to dodge.

“I’m asking you a specific question about the centers that are fully funded by user fees,” Senator Murray continued.

“That’s one center. That’s the tobacco center,” Commissioner Makary said. “You just said we can’t just keep cut and cut—we can’t keep hiring and hiring, the agency doubled since 2007. So, let me ask you, what is the right number of employees?”

“No, you’re here to answer my questions here, and I’m going to ask some more,” Senator Murray replied. “Without critical support staff you fired, inspectors cannot plan their trips. They cannot do their jobs. I want to ask you, what percent of planned inspections has FDA missed since those April 1st firings?”

Commissioner Makary said, “In the 12 labs that we have that evaluate food products in the food inspection realm, there are no—as of last week, I just did a check—there are no backlogs. They are running at 100 percent efficiency. There are no drug approval delays despite the—you know, what people want to attribute—”

“That is not what I’ve been told. I have been told—and I would like you to go back and check and report back to us, because we know that some of the planned inspections… that were supposed to take place have been missed. And, to me, why that’s so important, if there is not inspections, the public doesn’t have the information that they need. I am going to run out of time, so I want to move on,” Senator Murray replied.

“There are no cuts to inspectors,” Commissioner Makary said.

“Will you go back and check for me, please?” asked Senator Murray.

“Absolutely,” replied Commissioner Makary.

[CONFLICTS OF INTEREST]

Senator Murray continued by asking about reports of eyebrow-raising conflicts of interest at FDA: “I understand that the FOIA staff producing documents related to ongoing litigation by the Children’s Health Defense—Secretary Kennedy’s organization—was shielded from the RIFs, while other FOIA staff are responsible for FOIA responses at other FDA centers were targeted for termination. Is that true?,” Murray asked.

“That’s not true, senator, we have our FOIA staff. They continue to work at the FDA. I’ve made sure that all the FOIA staff at the FDA are doing their job. We are also using AI to reduce the burden on that staff,” responded Commissioner Makary.

Senator Murray pressed, “Well for the record, my understanding is that the Children’s Health Defense FOIA staff were not fired when other ones were… And that seems like a real conflict of interest to me, considering that the Secretary’s extensive history with that organization, Children’s Health Defense, and his goal to remove authorizations for vaccines. So, I just want that on the record—”

“It’s not true. Well, all FOIA staff are in place,” Commissioner Makary continued to claim.

[MIFEPRISTONE]

Senator Murray moved on to her next question, pressing Commissioner Makary on the Trump administration’s attempts to lay the groundwork to restrict access to medication abortion based on junk science being pushed by anti-abortion extremists. Murray asked: “If a study came out saying that people who took a certain medication experience a certain rate of ‘serious adverse events,’ but the study’s authors refused to say what they were counting as an adverse event—would raise some serious questions about the study’s validity?”

“Yes, senator. So I have the natural inquisition of a scientist that’s done a lot of research. So, I would want to see the underlying data, yes,” replied Commissioner Makary.

“I am, of course, talking about the recent sham ‘study’ from the Ethics and Public Policy Center—it’s an anti-abortion group, it’s bank-rolled by extremists, they fought to overturn Roe v. Wade,” Murray said. “And this ‘study,’ if you can call it that, is unsound and has been widely panned by medical experts. But, days after its release, you and Secretary Kennedy are now suggesting we need a ‘complete review’ on the safety of mifepristone.”

“Now, to be clear: mifepristone has been proven safe and effective in more than 100 studies over three decades. And the people that are now pushing that bogus ‘study’ and saying mifepristone is dangerous for women are the exact same people who think that abortion is never necessary to save a woman’s life, and that 10-year-olds should somehow be forced into childbirth. I believe that this administration is laying the groundwork to rip away access to medication abortion across the country,” Murray said. “This has not gotten enough attention. And I know you’d prefer to keep it that way, but I want you to know: I’m not going to let that happen.”

“I have not seen that study, Senator, and you have not seen that study. So how can you call it a sham, bogus study? Neither of us have seen the study, the underlying data, or the methodology,” Commissioner Makary said.

“Actually, that’s not true,” Murray replied. The Ethics and Public Policy Center is an anti-abortion advocacy group that was an advisory board member for Project 2025, has submitted amicus briefs to the Supreme Court opposing mifepristone, and does not believe in life-saving abortions—putting them far outside the medical mainstream. As the Washington Post fact-check of the ‘study’ points out, unlike most credible medical studies, the Ethics and Public Policy Center report did not undergo a formal external peer review before publication and “moreover, the report oddly does not reveal the database it used”—making it impossible for anyone to view the underlying data. That hasn’t stopped the anti-abortion Ethics and Public Policy Center from launching an activist campaign around the release of the data and even admitting the goal was to “eliminate” abortion pills.

On May 14th in a HELP Committee hearing with Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy (RFK) Jr. Senator Josh Hawley (R-MO) secured a commitment from Secretary Kennedy that HHS and FDA would review what RFK Jr. referred to as “alarming” new data on mifepristone—referencing the EPCC study alone. “It’s alarming, and it indicates that at the very least, the label should be changed,” Secretary Kennedy said. “I’ve asked Marty Makary at the FDA to do a complete review and report back.” Senator Hawley secured the same commitment from President Trump’s nominee to serve as Deputy Secretary of Health and Human Services in a HELP Committee hearing on May 8th—again, based solely on the EPCC ‘study’ that has not been peer-reviewed or published in a medical journal and has attracted widespread scrutiny for appearing to dramatically overstate what it characterizes as “serious adverse effects” associated with the pill.

____________________________________

As a longtime appropriator and former Chair of the Senate HELP Committee, Senator Murray has a long history of demanding accountability and careful oversight when it comes to the safety of products families use every day. At the end of 2022, Senator Murray passed legislation giving FDA new authority to, for the first time ever, regulate the safety of cosmetic products and force a recall when necessary—and she successfully fought to secure funding for this important work last year as Chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee. Senator Murray has also previously pressed FDA and industry for answers and action regarding asbestos in children’s make up kits, demanded answers from Johnson & Johnson regarding asbestos found in baby powder, and was a leading voice in holding FDA accountable and pushing for solutions following the infant formula contamination and shortage crisis in 2022.

Senator Murray leads the Democratic caucus on reproductive health care and, throughout her career, has beat back countless Republican attempts to defund Planned Parenthood and other family planning services—and is widely credited with successfully pushing the Bush administration’s FDA to follow the science and make Plan B available over the counter. Senator Murray led the response in Congress to FDA v. Alliance for Hippocratic Medicine, a lawsuit brought by Republican anti-abortion extremists trying to rip away access to mifepristone, a safe and effective abortion medication that was approved by FDA in 2000—Murray led multiple amicus briefsorganized her colleagues, and raised the alarm at every turn. Last June, the Supreme Court dismissed the case on standing groups but Murray made clear that “the nationwide threat to medication abortion has not gone away—far from it. If Donald Trump and his anti-abortion allies return to power, they will do everything they can to rip away access to mifepristone and ban abortion nationwide.” Murray also spearheaded efforts in Congress urging the FDA to follow the science and review the application of Opill, the first over-the-counter birth control pill, after the FDA’s Advisory Committee voted unanimously to recommend FDA approval.

In March, at Dr. Makary’s nomination hearing before the Senate HELP Committee, Senator Murray pressed Dr. Makary to commit to upholding the science on mifepristone and contraception—he refused to definitively answer her question.

###


The following sites updated: