Tuesday, October 28, 2025

War Criminal Chump


The first step was taken seven weeks ago. Donald Trump ordered a deadly military strike against a civilian boat in international waters, and according to the White House, the operation killed 11 people. The president justified the strikes by claiming the targets were boats smuggling drugs that would eventually reach the United States, but neither he nor his team presented any evidence — to the public or to Congress — in support of the claim.
It was the first, but not the last. The second came two weeks later, followed soon after by several more. Late last week, the Republican administration pointed to a seventh such strike, followed by an eighth, this time in the Pacific Ocean. The New York Times reported:

The Times’ report, which has not been independently verified by MSNBC, noted the White House has officially claimed that the first seven strikes have collectively killed 32 people. If the latest reporting is correct, it suggests that the new total is nearly three dozen.

Of course, we have no way of knowing for sure whether there have been other, unannounced military strikes and whether the official death toll is accurate. Team Trump has also continued to ignore calls, even from Republican lawmakers, to justify the operations with evidence.
There are also related questions about whether the strikes are illegal. As the Times’ report added, “A broad range of outside legal specialists in laws governing the use of armed force have said the campaign is illegal because the military is not permitted to deliberately target civilians — even criminal suspects — who are not directly participating in hostilities.”

America's Aunt Lindsey (Graham) is running interference for Chump as C.I. noted Sunday night:

Miss Lindsey Graham appeared on CBS' FACE THE NATION today and has truly gone bonkers.  After failing to successfully present opposition to a ground war in Venezuela as a partisan issue (host Margaret Brennan countered, "Well, there's a lot there, sir, but you cited a Democratic senator's criticism. He's not the only one. Some of your Republican colleagues have been uncomfortable with what little information has been shared with Congress." and then noted three examples), Graham grew only more untethered to reality, "Yeah. Well, I think the end game is to make sure that Venezuela and Colombia cannot be used to poison America, that the narco-terrorist dictator Maduro no longer be able to threaten our country and to send in drugs to kill Americans."  That's now the way the US decides to go to war?  

Next up, Junior readies his forces at Health and Human Services to go to war over artificial petroleum-based dyes in foods and, noting that this historically originated in Egypt, he's going to war with Egypt.

Maybe we should go to war with Chump?  He is flooding the country with hate.

Graham's so distracted that he says crap like this, "When President Bush, 41, took Ortega out in Panama, Reagan went into Grenada to deal with the Cuban influence from Grenada in our backyard, he has all the authority in the world."  Huh?  Is Lindsey now huffing Donald's dirty drawers?  How else to explain that sentence?  Ronald Reagan and Grenada did not happen after Poppy Bush and Ortega.  Is Lindsey on some sexual high -- did he get a new copy of INCHES delivered? -- or is losing his mind and no longer to think in terms of chronology?


Margaret Brennan repeatedly attempted to bring reality into the conversation:

 
MARGARET BRENNAN:  We looked at the JAG manual: preventative self defense employed to counter non imminent threats is illegal under international law. So if we are not at war and these suspected criminals pose no threat of imminent violence, isn't this potentially a war crime to be killing the people on these boats and then to be taking out a leader?
[. . .]

But is trafficking cocaine an armed attack on the United States? That's what you're equating it to?

[. . .]

Well, you referenced something earlier. Sorry. I want to come back to you said to the men and women of the military that they are carrying out lawful orders. Secretary Hegseth removed the top uniformed lawyers in the Air Force, you know this, the Navy and the Army, because he called them roadblocks to orders that are given by a commander-in-chief. There have been other departures as well. This raises concern that commanders are not being given adequate legal counsel. That is why you just said that sentence, to assure them.

 
Instead of providing logical answers, Lindsey snarled things like, "That's that's garbage, that's absolute garbage" as though Margaret had suggested that Nick Jonas' hairy lower back wasn't as sexy as Joe Jonas chest -- a topic Lindsey could speak to at length.

Poor Lindsey, a life lived on hold, the personification of Don't Ask Don't Tell. It apparently took Laura Loomer putting it on Twitter for the GOP to acknowledge their Auntie Lindsey.  Now they just need to find him a fellow.


Chump is a War Criminal. 

And let's stop pretending this is about drugs.  It's about Venezuela's oil.  We all know that's why he's targeting Venezuela and not Columbia.  He's a War Criminal and this is a war he started. 


Some comments on Benen's article:


S P
4 days ago
Attacking what appears to be civilian boats in international waters is illegal. Absolutely no evidence has been shown that identifies those crafts as carrying illegal drugs. A navy ship can stop and search a boat in international waters if there is suspicion of foul play. International laws can be followed to do this properly and even arrest the culprits if they are indeed doing something illegal. The US navy should be capable of stopping these boats and searching them.


Kirk Bruner
3 days ago
Trump knows that if he blows up the boats and remains of the occupants, there's no evidence to show. This is a violation of international law. Trump is officially a pirate as defined by law.

CC P
4 days ago
America elected a dictator, and this is what you get with dictators.  They are Judge, Jury, and executioner.  What they don't like or agree with they remove at any cost even if it means committing murder.


Craig Marvin
4 days ago
Bombing boats in international waters, without a declaration of war is commonly known as murder. Trump should be delivered to the world court in The Hague and charged with murder. He should be joined by Putin and Netanyahu.


Here's C.I.'s "The Snapshot:"


Monday, October 27, 2025.  Chump's government shutdown continues, foodbanks running out of food, polling reflects America's disapproval of Chump, look at the anti Kamal voice now showing up at THE NEW REPUBLIC to type a 'think piece' that required no real thought, and much more.


Let's start with some good news regarding redistricting via MEIDASTOUCH NEWS.



Ben covers the ongoing Chump shutdown and the foodbanks.  We'll also note  Eileen Sullivan and Drew Atkins (NEW YORK TIMES):


When Jill Hornick woke up on Monday morning, her first thought was that her timecard would be submitted that day for her job with the Social Security Administration in Chicago. But this Monday was different. The federal government was locked in a shutdown, and she received a paycheck for $0.

“This is the only income I have,” she said. “And I just started crying. I had a meltdown.”

Ms. Hornick, 59, is one of 730,000 federal employees working without pay because of the impasse. Another 670,000 federal workers are furloughed without pay, according to data from the Bipartisan Policy Center, a Washington think tank.

As the shutdown stretches toward its fifth week, those government employees are confronting an increasingly acute and stressful scenario. Their bills are mounting, and there is no clear resolution in sight.

Some are turning to side hustles like delivering food, walking dogs and selling personal items to bring in a bit of income. Others are relying on food banks that have been hastily organized to provide federal workers and contractors with free groceries — efforts that community service providers say reflect a broadening food insecurity caused by the shutdown.


At the end of last week, Senator Patty Murray's office issued the following:


NEW FROM AP: 6 in 10 Americans are “extremely” or “very” concerned about their health costs going up in the next year

NEW FROM SEATTLE TIMES: WA residents shopping for health insurance hit with sticker shock

NEW FROM TRI-CITY HERALD: Health insurance could double for thousands in Tri-Cities and Eastern WA

 ***WATCH press conference HERE, download HERE***

Washington, D.C. – Today, on the 23rd day of the Republican shutdown, U.S. Senator Patty Murray (D-WA), Vice Chair of the Senate Appropriations Committee and a senior member and former chair of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee, held a virtual press conference with Ingrid Ulrey, CEO of the Washington State Health Benefit Exchange, and Nanette Smith, a retiree from Tumwater who uses the Affordable Care Act (ACA) Exchange to get her health insurance.

At the press conference, Senator Murray explained how inaction by Republican members of Congress will force Washingtonians to pay significantly more for health care. On Tuesday, Washington state’s ACA marketplace, Washington Healthplanfinder, opened to allow Washingtonians to window shop for health care coverage, and multiple reports have already found that people in Washington state are seeing their premiums dramatically increase as they begin shopping for plans. The over 220,000 Washingtonians who buy health insurance through the marketplace and rely on the ACA tax credits to afford health care will see an average increase of 21% in their health care premiums thanks to Republicans’ refusal to extend the ACA enhanced premium tax credits. This drastic cost increase will push an estimated 80,000 Washingtonians off their health coverage over the next decade. A Washington-state specific fact sheet on the ACA tax credits is HERE.

Right now, Democrats are fighting to save the ACA tax credits, which expire at the end of the year. Without them, 22 million Americans will see their health care costs skyrocket. Premiums will more than double, on average, for Americans who buy health care through the ACA exchanges, and these higher costs will push 4.8 million people off their health coverage over the next decade.

Senator Murray implored Republican leaders to come to the negotiating table as new signs indicate that Republicans are feeling the heat for ignoring the health care crisis and allowing the ACA enhanced premium tax credits to expire at the end of the year. Reporting has uncovered that the White House is privately fretting about the issue, and President Trump signaled openness to cutting a deal. Meanwhile, some House Republicans have called out Republican leadership for causing the shutdown and failing to have a solution or plan to prevent people’s premiums from exploding.

“Right now, window shopping is underway in Washington state and other states across the country. That means people are logging in, looking for a health plan for next year, and coming face-to-face with some eye-popping price hikes. We are talking about people learning their premiums will double, triple, and in some cases, quadruple. I’ve heard from parents and small business owners who were told their monthly payment would increase by a thousand dollars or more per month,” said Senator Murray. “Why is this happening? Simply put: Republicans have refused to stop it. Democrats have been calling all year for action on this. We tried to pass an extension while Republicans were shoveling tax breaks at billionaires when they passed their Big Ugly Bill, but they voted it down three times, and Republican leaders have refused to talk about this with us… The most important thing families can do right now is speak up. Let’s be clear, Republicans are sticking their heads as deep in the sand as they can manage. And they would literally rather shut down the government than talk about this!”

Senator Murray played a critical role in passing the enhanced premium tax credits in the American Rescue Plan in 2021 and extending them in the Inflation Reduction Act in 2022, and she has been fighting for months to make sure these important health care tax credits don’t expire, including cosponsoring multiple pieces of legislation—the Health Care Affordability Act and theProtecting Health Care and Lowering Costs Act—that would make them permanent.

“Since 2021 the Enhanced ACA tax credits have been a lifeline for our customers, enabling them to keep up with rising premiums and stay covered. This year, as mentioned, we have approximately 220,000 Washingtonians who are benefiting from these ACA tax credits. And without them, our actuaries have predicted that up to 80,000 of our customers may experience price hikes so high that they will make a very difficult decision to just drop coverage. So right now the folks and in our market who we are most concerned about include those who are our middle income customers, who are approximately, you know, a modest annual salary of $62,000 or more per individual, or $85,000 or more for a couple who will no longer receive any level of tax credit or support if Congress doesn’t take action, and they will be the most affected,” said Ingrid Ulrey, CEO of the Washington State Health Benefit Exchange. “These customers who are most affected and are feeling it the most include many small business owners, gig workers, and individuals who are self-employed, as well as older adults who are 50 plus but not yet on Medicare. We predict that many of these customers will experience increases of up to $5,000 per year, and for some even the doubling and tripling that Senator Murray that you called out, and it’s at that level that becomes the breaking point when people think about, I have my mortgage, I have my groceries, I have all my essential expenses, and feel that they just can’t hang on… So if and when Congress can come to an agreement to extend the tax credits, the Exchange stands ready to pass on this relief to our customers. While this is not going to be as easy as flipping a switch, we will work with our partners, including the office of the insurance commissioner and our carriers, to make the necessary changes in our system as soon as possible. The sooner that Congress acts, the sooner that Washingtonians will benefit.”

“I was shocked when I got an email on Tuesday this week about my premiums and how it would increase. My husband and I are retired. He’s already on Medicare, but I’m only 64 so I’ve got another year ago. And the estimate for our premiums was going to include a $400 a month increase, that’s close to $5,000 a year. On a fixed income that is really, really going to hurt us. That’s going to cut into our already very, very, very tight budget. One of the points I want to make is that this is not political. This is not about Republicans and Democrats. This is about a moral issue. This is about taking care of American citizens. You know, I pay my taxes, I pay my premiums, and I do all the things that responsible citizens do. And this is a moral issue. This really crosses party lines,” said Nanette Smith, a retiree from Tumwater who uses the ACA Exchange to get her health insurance. “This is a really tight time of year coming up anyway. I just am in recovery from a pretty significant back surgery. So I have ongoing medical bills that I’m still dealing with. My husband has issues coming up that he’s going to have to deal with in medical things. And so these are things we tried to plan ahead for, trying to think ahead for, but we just could not imagine a $400 a month additional hit to our income. Gas prices are high, groceries are high, utilities are going to be even higher going into the winter. So, you know, we try to be responsible. We try to be frugal. We don’t go out to dinner, frankly. We don’t buy new things. We have older vehicles. And this is really something that is going to hit us pretty hard. And not just us, but many, many, many other people. I’ve never done anything like this before. I’ve never spoken out publicly before, but I really just felt like not only for me, but for anyone else in this situation, it’s just very important to tell my story and hopefully, maybe the politicians across the aisle will be able to work things out and do what’s right for the American people.”

Senator Murray’s remarks, as delivered on today’s press call, are below:

“Thank you all for joining me. We are just a week away from Open Enrollment kicking off nationwide. And as of this week, window shopping is now underway in Washington state. And people across our state, and the country, are talking about the massive premium hikes they are seeing when they log in.

“Well, everyone except Republicans in Congress, who are trying to duck their heads in the sand. And in the case of House Republicans, who have literally been on vacation for over a month.

“Republicans are still refusing to even talk about, let alone address, the fact that premiums are about to double for millions of families if they do not work with us to save the ACA enhanced tax credits.

“There are hundreds of thousands of families across Washington state who rely on the ACA tax credits to afford their health plan. Over 220,000, to be exact.

“And that is just the tip of the iceberg. Literally just one percent of how many people this will hit nationwide. There are over 22 million people who rely on these tax credits that Republicans are refusing to save. Nearly 5 million of them will end up uninsured if we don’t do something.

“In other words, we are a week away from a complete health care disaster. But today, right now, we already have a clear view of the train that is coming down the tracks. And people are panicking.

“Because right now, window shopping is underway in Washington state and other states across the country.

“That means that people are logging in, looking for a health plan for next year, and coming face-to-face with some eye-popping price hikes. We are talking about people learning that their premiums will double, triple, and in some cases, quadruple.

“I’ve heard from parents and small business owners who were told their monthly payment would increase by a thousand dollars or more a month. And I know there are lots of families just now tuning into this issue, as they get ready to shop for health care plans for next year.

“So here’s a quick rundown for everyone who is wondering: what exactly is it Republicans are so determined to avoid talking about? Why is my premium going through the roof?

“What is happening? Window shopping for health care plans has already started in Washington state and across the country in many places. Families are logging on to the health care exchange to see massive price hikes. Monthly premiums doubling, and tripling, and worse.

“Why is this happening? Simply put: Republicans have refused to stop it. Democrats have been calling all year for action on this. We tried to pass an extension while Republicans were shoveling tax breaks at billionaires when they passed their Big Ugly Bill, but they voted it down three times, and Republican leaders have refused to talk about this with us. 

“Where can you learn more? Families in Washington state can go to WAhealthpathfinder.org to see what their health plan options will cost for 2026.

“What can you do about this? The most important thing families can do right now is speak up. Let’s be clear, Republicans are sticking their heads as deep in the sand as they can manage. And they would literally rather shut down the government than talk about this!

“We have to make sure we are so loud they cannot ignore us, no matter how hard they try.

“And that’s exactly why I am holding calls like this, and lifting up stories on the ground about the massive price hikes families are facing. I’m going to try to use my megaphone to amplify the stories Republicans are so determined to ignore.

“From the stories here in Washington, and even the stories of some of our Republican neighbors that they are trying to ignore in their own states.

“And now is a critical moment to make sure those voices are echoing loud and clear. Because as I said, window shopping is open, and even more families are seeing what this means for them, and speaking out, demanding action.”

###


New topic . . . 

Oh look in the  I-Pose-As-A-Democrat-And-Would-Play-One-On-TV-But-No-One-Will-Put-Me-On-TV category, we have Liza Featherstone, child-bride of professional scorn Doug Henwood.  But for some reason, she's being allowed to drop her garbage off at THE NEW REPUBLIC (where she's a 'contributing editor') instead of JACOBIN, THE NATION and IN THESE TIMES -- the usual landfills she pollutes.  She wants to write about . . . anything that will get her a pay check.  So she decides to write bout "cancel cutlure" but can't even manage that.


She thinks something different is happening right now with Chump in the Oval Office.  It's a wider scaled but it's not all that different from the days of Bully Boy Bush.  Has she forgotten, among others, Peter Arnett, Ward Churchill, Natalie Maines and her Chicks, Bill Maher, Dan Rather and all the others axed during Bully Boy Bush's two terms?  


She wants to line  cancel culture up as something from Barack Obama's second term.   Huh?  Again, she's just in for the money.  She's not trying to explore a topic or inform.  


She's doing her usual garbage of pretending to defend the left while she attacks it.  It's understandable, she says, people recoiling from the left's cancel culture -- without ever defining it or providing examples.


There's been no cancel culture in the time she's referring to.


It's a nice excuse for a lot of male comedians who can't adapt to changing times.  They're like Sid Caeser in the 80s whining about eople not finding him funny.  All you had to do was make an effort to come into the decade and you were fine.


Doubt it?  Racism was preached and taught on FAMILY GUY.  No one remembers that now?


Brian was a racist dog and Scth MacFarlane thought that was hysterical.  Brian made racist comments non-stop, in the SNL episode he barked and growled at anyone Black, etc, etc.  Seth sensed the changing times and Brian's now the completely different.  


And no one's called for a protest of Seth.


But a lot of bad comics from the 90s found out that kids that didn't watch SNL or SEINFELD in the 90s don't feel llike they owe you s**t and they don't.  Michael Richards thought it was funny to yell the "N" word?  In the 90s, the fan base might have allowed it.  But by the time he did it, we all knew better.  And was their anything more ridiculous than watching Jerry Seinfeld on TV trying to mitigate it so that his syndication millions were safe?  Jerry's one of the worst when it comes to whining about cancel culture.  


The only real victim of cancel cutlure was Roseanne Barr.  Jerry defended her for bout five seconds before he was informed it was threating the SEINFELD syndication millions.


Roseanne was not a racist then (I haven't really spoken to her since).  She did a Tweet and suddenly the whole world was on her.


Why?


Because of the power of the left!


I wish.  I wish that we were that powerful.  Liza if she were a real feminist (as opposed to a woman who pops up during any election cycle to insist that every woman running for office -- especially president -- is not a feminist). could have explored that.


The reason the takedown of Rosenne worked?  There were many.


History?  Roseanne had pissed off a lot of conservatives with her statements over the year and her notorious performance of "The Star Spangled Banner."  Those people never forgot and had the knives out.  


Gender?  America has a blood lust when it comes to women -- Bash The Bitch, Ava and I long ago dubbed it.  The only thing that hates women more?  Network execs -- even at LIFETIME.  They don't like being pushed around by a Tim Allen but they'll take it.  When a Roseanne Barr pushed them around, all their fear of Mommy runs to the surface.  That's why the reboot was the first time you saw Roseanne star in a scripted TV show since the end of ROSEANNE in the 90s.  One of the hugest shows ever and there was no effort to star her in another.  They didn't want a damn thing to do with her.  Contrast that with Kelsey Grammer.  On CHEERS, he was a bit player.  He had his own hit with FRAISER. But it wasn't ROSEANNE level hit.  Even so, that show ends and he's given one attempt after another to carry a show.  There was BACK TO YOU, HANK, BOSS, PARTNERS, THE LAST TYCOON, PROVEN INNOCENT (a bad rip off of a series of sketches on THE KROLL SHOW), and then, in 2023, the FRAISER reboot. That list is from 2007 to 2023.  And look at how many chances he was given -- despite failing over and over and despire FRAISER never being as big of a hit as ROSEANNE.


Money. Roseanne grew up working class.  Roseanne's a socialist.  ABC had the biggest show on TV with the reboot.  And they had Sara Gilbert eager to stab Roseanne in the back.  'Brave' Sara who used to tell her children not to talk about Mommy's partner because people couldn't know Mommy was gay.  That's what a creep Sara is and a coward.  She wants to be with a woman, she wants to have children with a woman, but she doesn't want to be out.  So she raised her children in shame.  Disgusting.  And Roseanne saved Sara, she gave her a career.  ABC always thought, from her first audition, that Sara was gay.  They called her "Darlene the D**e."  That's why they didn't pursue a spin-off for her.  And there was Sara stabbing Roseanne in the back.


No one got cancel cultured like Roseanne.


She didn't just lose her job when she was on the biggest show on television.  She lost her creations and her copyrights. 


The network and Sara began this public campaign against Roseanne: She's cost all these people their jobs!!!!!


They used that lie to guilt and blackmail her into signing over her own rights.  That's why THE CONNORS stayed on the air.  It was not a big hit anymore but every penny went to ABC for 'creating' a TV show.  They stole that, they didn't create it. 

In terms of others?  


I wish "cancel culture" has existed when I was starting my career.  So many untalented people could have claimed that as the reason they got nowhere.  Most of the cancelled people I'm aware of cancelled themselves and got what they deserved.


Lesbian-posing Michelle Shocked (and, yes, she did pose all the way through "Anchorage" as a lesbian) goes to San Francisco and in the middle of her act starts attacking gay people?   She cancelled herself.  And she'd been making those comments for some time but most thought she was being misquoted.  For instance, would Laura Flanders had given Michelle Shocked an hour of her radio show on a Saturday if she'd known Michelle was a homophobe?  No.


We could go on and on but let's wind up already on this topic.  Birdbrain Liza Featherstone doesn't grasp what cancel culture is and she also doesn't grasp what Blacklisted by the Government is.  They are two different things.  She's too much of an idiot to grasp that reality.


Just like she was too much of an idiot to endorse Kamala offering instead crap like "I wrote about our political moment and why even Kamala Harris might be better:"


Oh, go sit down.  Haven't you caused enough problems already, White Karen?


In other news, the polling is not good for Chump.   Eric Garcia (INDEPENDENT) notes:



Inflation ticked up 0.3 percent for the month and 3 percent over the past 12 months as President Donald Trump defended his tariffs against Canada.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics on Friday released the Consumer Price Index report that tracks inflation. The report had been delayed due to the government shutdown that began this month. The shutdown has also delayed the monthly jobs report that shows how many jobs were added or lost during September.


He lies about it constantly.  As though Americans can be conned endlessly and won't notice the huge increase in prices?  Bella Arnold (BUZZFEED) notes:

After Trump became the president-elect, a TikToker called TheEggWatch was skeptical about his promise to make egg prices great again. So, TheEggWatch decided to do exactly what his name suggests — watch the eggs. More specifically, he wanted to see how a Trump presidency would affect their prices.
“I felt that was a thing that can be easily proven true or false with documentation. So, that’s what I did,” he told BuzzFeed.

Now, TheEggWatch doesn’t just follow how egg prices are changing in Trump’s America. He also tracks gas and general grocery prices.

[. . .]
The price of a bag of coffee at TheEggWatch's local store was previously $7.99. Now, it's $9.99 a bag.
On Jan. 19, 2025, TheEggWatch bought a pack of bacon for $7.49. Now, it's on sale for $8.99.
A pack of giant Hershey's with almonds was $3.99. Now, it's $5.29.
The store's tailless beef loin boneless New York strip steak was $13.99 per pound when Biden was last in office. Now, that same steak is $16.99 per pound.

Bananas went from $0.54 to $0.59, which is approximately a 9% increase.
Lean ground beef was $5.69 per pound in January. Now, it's $7.49 per pound
And, finally: Chicken breasts were $4.99 per pound on Jan. 19, 2025. Now, they're $5.49 per pound.

 That's reality.  Here's another reality, Chump lies about inflation non-stop.  As Steve Benen (MADDOW BLOG, MSNBC) points out:

At a White House event on Thursday afternoon, Donald Trump bragged, in response to an unrelated question, that he’d “already taken care of” inflation. For those who keep an eye on the president’s public positions, the lie was jarring but familiar.

With unnerving frequency, Trump ignores economic data to insist — reality be damned — that he’s successfully “defeated,” “cured” and “solved” inflation.

American consumers would likely be delighted if such boasts were true. They are not. One day after the Republican again claimed to have triumphed over inflation, NBC News reported:

The data complicates the short-term future of U.S. monetary policy: The Federal Reserve has indicated that it expects to lower interest rates in response to the weakening economy, especially as job growth weakens to lows unseen since the Great Recession, but Fed Chair Jerome Powell’s inflation target is 2%.

With the latest report showing the Consumer Price Index inching up to 3%, the economy appears to be moving in the wrong direction, creating an uncertain path for the central bank.

As for the politics, the latest national poll from The Associated Press found that only 36% of Americans support Trump’s handling of the economy. Other recent surveys have pointed in the same direction.


Winding down, Senator Elizabeth Warren's office issued the following:


“Any effort to weaponize the IRS against President Trump’s perceived enemies is against the law, an abuse of power, and a threat to the integrity of our democratic institutions. [The IRS] cannot be the President’s political attack dog.”

Text of Letter (PDF)

Washington, D.C. - Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.), Ranking Member Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), and Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) led Democrats on the Senate Finance Committee in demanding answers about the Trump administration’s reported plans to weaponize the IRS criminal-investigative (IRS-CI) division in an attack on the free speech rights of progressive individuals and political opponents.

“Federal law prohibits political interference with the administration of tax laws…You must immediately end all attempts to politicize the agency, including attempts to use the agency to attack Americans with different political views,” the senators wrote.

Under federal law, the President, Vice President, White House staff, and almost all cabinet-level officials are barred from requesting investigations into specific taxpayers.

The changes to IRS-CI appear to be part of a broader effort by the Trump Administration to use the powers of the federal government to target the President’s political enemies. For example, Trump administration officials have been trying to revoke Harvard’s tax-exempt status since the President directed the IRS to do so. IRS lawyers have reportedly blocked these efforts, arguing they have no legal basis. Now, it appears the Trump administration is trying to evade these restrictions by proposing changes to how IRS criminal probes are conducted, including changing the Internal Revenue Manual to diminish the role that chief-counsel lawyers play in criminal investigations.

“IRS-CI cannot be used as a weapon to target political enemies, and any attempt to turn it into one is illegal,” the senators concluded. “You should immediately end all attempts to politicize the IRS, including attempts to use the agency to attack Americans who have different political views.”

The senators requested more information, including about administration officials that have directed and participated in this IRS weaponization, what changes the Administration intends to make to IRS policy, and what individuals and groups the Administration is targeting.

Senator Warren has fought against the Trump administration’s disturbing efforts to silence free speech and weaponize the federal government against political rivals:

  • On September 23, 2025 Senator Warren, Markey (D-Mass.), Merkley (D-Ore.), and Sanders (D-Vt.) wrote to Nexstar Media Group and Sinclair demanding answers on the possibility of a quid pro quo arrangement with the Trump administration in exchange for preempting Jimmy Kimmel Live! on ABC affiliate stations.
  • On September 23, 2025, Senator Warren released a statement after Nexstar Media Group’s and Sinclair’s decisions to continue to preempt Jimmy Kimmel Live! on ABC affiliate stations.
  • On May 20, 2025, Senator Warren questioned the Trump administration’s nominee for IRS Commissioner, Billy Long, as to the potential weaponization of the IRS against political opponents.

###


The following sites updated: